Just want to get a general feel on opinion, should MA join the nrl side towards end of year in a 14 role (10-15 min) or should he stay in nsw cup and keep working on his craft. Plenty of good things in the 19s origin but also some issues with his game. Getting him into the nrl side could be good to see what that level is about so wouldn't mind him in the 14 for last couple of games. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • BEM, i see your pain and view mate; i think give the kid 2-3 games ideally it would have been better around origin time (if we were embedded in the top 4) but now for me do it later on in the season. Mate Lussick is not going to be our future, whereas MA will be or should be for me.

      • I agree about Lussick. 

        When most were saying he is great and better than Mahoney, I was saying he is bog average and we shouldn't be bringing him back.

        I just don't won't the young blokes confidence destroyed playing in our lacklustre 1st grade squad with a bum coach.

    • Cayless for coach BEM, I dont think so. He plays first grade it is with Moses, Brown, Gutherson and Hopgood, I will trust them to look after him and teach him more than he will learn in 3 seasons of Cup under Cayless! The kids already smarter than most of them!

      • Well said Poppa.

      • Cayless isn't there anymore so that's no longer a concern. 

    • Absolutely accurate 👍 

  • still a baby faced kid. what would he do if he see jarred run at him

    • Did you see the size of the blokes running against him last night?

  • No where near ready for 1st grade.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
43 minutes ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
1 hour ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
2 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
2 hours ago
More…