Replies

  • Maybe he'll pull his finger out for the rest of the year . Kanes Eels legacy so far=would have rathered Able.

    • Lol

    • That's because u have no idea of Playing the game.

      The team is where they are because of Evans. Slap on a few more eggs on your face

      • When he's good he's good.He has played 35 games for us out of a possible 67 and he's probably been good for half of those.That's not value for money, and its definitely not the reason we are 10/12 this year,.However if he plays at his best for the rest of the year because he thinks he owes us (and he does)then he can have his pudding.

  • Is it definitely confirmed Evans is leaving?

    I hope not as I thought he was coming along nicely. He was very good at the end of 2019 and started 2020 extremely well, before injury/suspension. And Evans fulfills BA's stated ideas of wanting a mix of body shapes in the pack. I don't think the Eels have a ready replacement for Evans yet?

    • LOL " STARTED 2020 REALLY WELL" RIGHT.

      Maybe because he thought it's time to pull his finger out and play for a new contract.

      We don't need players like this.

  • Probably because Nathan Brown is new Warriors coach with assistance Gus (I know it all) Gould. 

  • Kane Evans will be a loss if this rumour comes to fruition - another 1-2 years from him would have been ideal. But as Evans admitted in an interview earlier this year the young bulls Hughes and Hollis are coming through so he may be exiting whilst he can

  • It took him a while to hit top gear, I think once he teamed up with Spud he went to another level, we’ve missed him. Pity he leaving because he best is yet to come. 

  • Big loss tbh, him and nuikore provide our best impact from the bench.

    Hopefully his replaced with someone of better quality.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Joeyboyz replied to Roy tannous's discussion Does anyone know what it is ?
"Yeah I know, it's a rip-off!"
57 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"We have so many second rowers, Warbrick is one head knock away from retirement. We would take Steph or Coates but melbourne are not giving them up. More likely to come down to if Ryles thinks Howarth is a fair value replacement and then Howarth has…"
3 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"And a micro pig."
3 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Eels demand one of three Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Would take any of them. Or as the girl said in the Old El Paso ad "Why not both?" Or change it to "Why not all?"
Dah dah dah dah da da da.
Of course, and they have every right to, offer us fringe nobodies for an International Winger. I mean they are…"
3 hours ago
More…