Does anyone know whether he has an exemption to play on Monday?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Disappointed to see him get injured again..
I've been a fan of his since he joined us. Offered speed out wide as we clearly lacked it with some of our past outside backs.
Guymer, Russell should be in the team either!"
I've been a fan of his since he joined us. Offered speed out wide as we clearly lacked it with some of our past outside backs.
Guymer, Russell should be in the team either!"
"Moses was definitely off in his game. Brown was basically non existent and the forwards weren't that great. Overall, it was a game the Eels could have and should have won but they were lacking! Hoping things might change when Lomax returns. "
"Guymer looks half the player That I watched coming through and who debuted last year. He dead set looks like Jake trbojec 2.0"
"I was disappointed that Ryles lost self control
I didn't see it like that Tad. He lost some composure..and that can have it's uses.
I get the impression that if Mr Ryles lost control in that room we would need a wheelbarrow and a mop"
I didn't see it like that Tad. He lost some composure..and that can have it's uses.
I get the impression that if Mr Ryles lost control in that room we would need a wheelbarrow and a mop"
Replies
Don't mind the speed bump playing
How do you get an exemption from a mandatory rule ? This competition is so fucking contradictory. They stand Brown down after letting Burgess play , and then let Weed play after he is subject to a mandatory rule .
How can you not be of the belief that the NRL have favourite clubs and club bosses . If SuoerLeague was an option tomorrow I'm not too sure I'd be as supportive of the ARL / NRL this time around .
Yep was thinking the exactly same thing. MANDATORY 11 days....Gotta love the NRL, just change the rules whenever it suit them
It's a bit of a joke . Is it not enough we have to put up with their officials being able to influence the games on the paddock with their inconsistent rulings , now they're even stepping into changing mandatory rules as they please . It kinda makes you feel like they take the punters for absolute dummies who they can purposely be as corrupt as they like right in front of our noses just to show us we can't do a fucking thing about it , and nobody with a voice in the media will call them out on it .
Mandatory is only catagory 1
Catageory 2 the club can ask for an exemption from a neurologist - which Cantebury did - all aboveboard
Ok , thanks for the clarification. I withdraw my rant .
Clubs have always been able to get a exemption , the just need to get a independent specialist to look at the report of why the player failed his HIA , a players past history of concussions and then they do a examination.
Is it a dodgy process ? Yes
Is a player going to be truthful at the examination about any symptoms they may be suffering from ? Of course not .
But when a player gets an exemption he needs to sign a document which protects the NRL .
Reg can use him as a bumper bar like last time
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next