Does anyone know whether he has an exemption to play on Monday?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
This is a topic i have been dreading for years and been saying the issues for years. I need to write this down as the ideas presented recently are concerning for the NRL moving forward. To summarise, the NRL are looking at, once 20 teams are in, of…
"Its 14 less. Have they go with the same amount of rounds with more teams its 50 more games.
Are you going to pay more money as a tv station or streamer for almost the same amount and less weeks overall of TV content?
The TV stations will say we get…"
Are you going to pay more money as a tv station or streamer for almost the same amount and less weeks overall of TV content?
The TV stations will say we get…"
"With more teams it's almost exactly the same amount of games in total. "
"Issue is since they have done this they cannot go back. Dan Ginnane said that last year once you go to 27 rounds you cannot go back. If you do it is to 26 rounds.
Shorter season is exactly what Bennett is saying is the issue, i have said it for…"
Shorter season is exactly what Bennett is saying is the issue, i have said it for…"
Replies
Don't mind the speed bump playing
How do you get an exemption from a mandatory rule ? This competition is so fucking contradictory. They stand Brown down after letting Burgess play , and then let Weed play after he is subject to a mandatory rule .
How can you not be of the belief that the NRL have favourite clubs and club bosses . If SuoerLeague was an option tomorrow I'm not too sure I'd be as supportive of the ARL / NRL this time around .
Yep was thinking the exactly same thing. MANDATORY 11 days....Gotta love the NRL, just change the rules whenever it suit them
It's a bit of a joke . Is it not enough we have to put up with their officials being able to influence the games on the paddock with their inconsistent rulings , now they're even stepping into changing mandatory rules as they please . It kinda makes you feel like they take the punters for absolute dummies who they can purposely be as corrupt as they like right in front of our noses just to show us we can't do a fucking thing about it , and nobody with a voice in the media will call them out on it .
Mandatory is only catagory 1
Catageory 2 the club can ask for an exemption from a neurologist - which Cantebury did - all aboveboard
Ok , thanks for the clarification. I withdraw my rant .
Clubs have always been able to get a exemption , the just need to get a independent specialist to look at the report of why the player failed his HIA , a players past history of concussions and then they do a examination.
Is it a dodgy process ? Yes
Is a player going to be truthful at the examination about any symptoms they may be suffering from ? Of course not .
But when a player gets an exemption he needs to sign a document which protects the NRL .
Reg can use him as a bumper bar like last time
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next