Replies

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Axel, once can only make guesses what the point of ABC article was, but it's clearly a product of some backgrounding (source that rejects attribution). Maybe there is an effort to get the Eels to rescind their court motion, via the court of public…"
2 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Poppa, point to what in my post unpacking the ABC article signals AI content. PS: not only am I radically opposed to using ChatGPT, I would also suggest you can't point to any 'marker' and, even worse, could not spot the counter-markers. Note if you…"
8 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"You can appeal a Supreme Court ruling, typically by taking the case to a higher court such as the Court of Appeal (a division of the Supreme Court) or the High Court of Australia. Appeals generally require demonstrating an error of law, new…"
40 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
""The purpose of the article was to be an article"
I know Daz is a professor and subtle as a sledge hammer but even that statement would make him think he has backed the wrong Donkey! LOL
PS I missed the media training and Axel noticed the subtlties…"
1 hour ago
More…