Does anyone know whether he has an exemption to play on Monday?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Bluey, Badger and Macey,
The NSW Supreme Court could uphold the restraint and still trim it. So we'd win in principle, but Lomax could be cleared to play earlier than 31 October 2028.
A pivot issue could be how the court see our 'alleged rejection'…"
The NSW Supreme Court could uphold the restraint and still trim it. So we'd win in principle, but Lomax could be cleared to play earlier than 31 October 2028.
A pivot issue could be how the court see our 'alleged rejection'…"
"I totally agree, but they were arrogant...they were sure we would buckle.
Not Today Satan"
Not Today Satan"
"Yep Badger, that sounds about right. If the Eels hold Zac's legal registered rights 2006-2008 to play NRL, then the Storm contract would be considered invalid as it goes against the strict conditions of the Eels release contract.
If the court was to…"
If the court was to…"
"We do anyway"
Replies
No . Reed will not play on Monday .https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/news-2023-reed-mahoney-hia-canterbury-...
Funny that, I just read he was playing.
F*ck mahoney. We got our own problems.
I hope he plays. He was awesome for us last time.
😂
Ha !!
It's the principal , they either have a rule of they don't .
Something tells me he might be the opposite this time around, be careful as he might be the difference this time
really hope the Eels win this game. Very annoyed about Dylan (5 times) Brown stuffing everything up for the team.
Don't mind the speed bump playing
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next