Replies

    • That was good to hear although that's irrelevant if they have player options

  • Pair of absolute muppets.

  • 1st time I hear Sean McElduff speak and I'm not impressed. Can't string a coherent sentence together.  

    • You did well to hear his soft little voice at all. Must be still waiting for his balls to drop!

  • how embarrassing ...'we wanted Bennett it's as simple as that'. Why mention it if they didn't have him locked up. Like turning up to an orgy without a boner.... walked out of there with limp d$cks in their hands....

  • This reply was deleted.
    • I cringed at some of the things they said. It came across as very unprofessional and naive. I know they were trying to be open but it didn't present the club as an organisation that knows what it's doing. I think that will scare off the best of the available coaches. I really can't see the club landing a better coach than BA, and that's not a very good position to be in.

  • Bragging about how you went sneaking around behind the current coaches back and missed out on the coach you wanted. What a pair of dopes.

  • Ray Hadley said the next move should be the chaiman and ceo and board to go.He said they are bunch of bankers who have no clue about football and sarantinos is a former dope who only job was chasing debts for ferrrer and hodgson.I can't see any decent coach wanting to come especially when they know the chaiman and ceo went behind the coaches back to get another coach whilst telling ba they had his back.

    Until these dopes go this club will never win another premiership.Its going to be 2011-13 all over again

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I like the signing of Kelly, it gives our outside backs, Russell and Simmonson a bit of competition. Most of the narrative around Kelly's signing has been about his terrible defence. I watched four Titans games from this year, his defence is not as…"
32 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"It's a footy forum, and that should be it. We've lost quite a few good posters the last few years, I don't know whether it's because of politics, religion, racism, language or we have lost them because of the lack of success the club has had for…"
56 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I read a few eels forums and there is always lots of infighting. Seperating the politics is a good idea as it is toxic and devisive. I actually think think the quality of this site has improved somewhat in the last year or so. "
2 hours ago
GOLDEEL replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I'm not sure when this site started but I've been on here from the early days and while I don't comment or post much I always check in to read everyone's opinions if they are good or bad. In all my time I've been here HOE I can say I enjoyed reading…"
2 hours ago
More…