Interesting questions have been raised (constantly) about our club and a SCAPEGOAT to blame.

Personally I am usually quick in seeing obvious problems and when you look at the period my experience covers, I have seen most of the things that only Parramatta supporter's can lament and relate to. 

This particular one is a quandry, I think MONS needs to go, but I don't actually blame him for any of the events that recognise the damage that has been outlined. I think he could be sitting back in his arm chair asking how he ended up in this mess?.......... I don't think he has ever been the final decision maker on most of the things we would like to blame him for.

The other protaganist and yes Scapegoat is Jim Saratinos? So I am going to critique both him and MON's and explain why they have been blamed 

The pathways coaches are recognised for their strong roles in rescuing the situation post Covid and I see no blame evolving there (unless it is still evolving).....the fan base tend's to overate them (our juniors) because we should be so strong in this area, yes we are a Development Club and we do provide a lot of players.....we would it seems not be overly good at bringing through the ones that we would like to claim. Maybe we are just victim's of that process as we have struggled to obtain balance with juniors and recruitment and in endeavoring to satisfy that equation.......Fcuked up Both!

Reverting to MONS you need to go back to his recruitment, he probably was never the right guy to table as General Manager Football whereas the reality is that the first grade coach in both BA's and JR's terms have been the final arbitar in almost all decisions outside of the financial impact of cap and policy. I think MON's has probably done a fine job in structuring and recruiting pathway coaches, even the women's coach. 

So this leads me to the final "scapegoat" Bernie Gurr! What!! you say....the guys the best thing to happen post the renaissance!.... yes that's true! he did a great job...but did he finish it?

I blame Bernie because he recruited MON as a General Manager Football, a role that he showed was pretty toothless because BA's power was at its peak and he (BA) really was the guy, making the decisions on recruitment and retention. Yes the position (GM) was part of the review, but a more constructive process would have allowed the person to grow into the role where the structure allowed it to.

MON's went about his business developing pathways and faciltating people in lower level's behind First and Second Grade and executing signings made for him. Never really empowered in the primary sense..

Jim Saratinos inherited Bernie's role, Jim is obviously a fine administrator and financial manager.....as a CEO empowered to be much more decisive about football matters, he simply wasn't !

Based on his inexperience in that role which he basically stayed out of and during the initial period that he came in, he saw/ recognised that BA had things under control and was content to leave it at that.

Intelligent people do quickly learn just the same and all the time this was happening Jim was learning heaps about the football side and I can only presume making judgements of the relative incumbents. He never had the football background or experience that Bernie had, who would have maybe acted very differently if he chose to stay on.....he left for greener pastures in the states, but is to this day still a passionate Parramatta supporter.

So we were left with our primary scapegoats and to evaluate the thoughts that come through this forum, we need to understand better than we do that things are not as Black and White to just go out and attack individuals for the perception of their failures.

Too many people on here put themselves in a position of decision makers, whereas they have no real understanding of how business works or things happen, everyone is entitled to an opinion, not saying that, just saying that the intelligence and actual judgement of making these things happen are stuffed up in a lot of busineses without thinking the guys have no fcuking idea!

I can only think of our politicians in comparison, but just remember, you put them there as well!!!

I don't have the answers BTW but Iam writing this so an understanding of the pieces that make up the "Parra Lament" are understood better. Everyone seems to have the answers by "sacking MON and JS" without understanding how pieces fit and what needs to be done......My initial reaction is that MON needs to go, because his credibility has now got huge question marks and that JIM needs to stay as I think we need a CEO like him but with the understanding of having proper GM Football who reports through him.....the GM Football needs a lot of thought because I would actually have Ryles also reporting to him, with a clear defintion I might add. Obviously that person needs to be very "powerful" to command such a role! 

An after thought by the way and not a recommendation, is that Jason Ryles could be a great GM Football and he appoints a coach to work under him! Early days for such a move, but I think that's where a lot of these processes need to head in the sense of how a coach is perceived......Foz's example of a coach and what he is achieving is an example that the modern day coach can keep it simple and the GM does the slogging!

An heirachel structure at Parra could be  GM Football runs all Football Matters.....reports through CEO for Finance & Administration Matters...... . First Grade Coach reports through and appointed by GM Football,........ Manager Pathways and Administration reports through GM Football. 

 

 

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

        • Poppa, I can add to your anecdote about the grade cricketer. Sometimes I see grad students whom I think "they will make it", and others "nah they will not make it". Academia is a hyper competitive market, with precariat positions more the norm now than tenured and the road to tenue now often going through years of precariat and soft-money research positions. As one of the lucky tenured I realize that sometimes the judgment of "they will NOT make it" is institition specific. Not here, but maybe there. For contingent reasons to do with those instititional contexts. 

          Thus, spotting "talent" is actually relational? It's seeing some things that suggest success is feasible, but also making judgments about under which contexts that success is most likely? 

          With those thoughts in mind, my bet is that talent scouting for footy players has similar issues attached to it

    • What metrics are you using to conclude that he is failing in those 3 aspects of his role?

    • All cat typing memes are confessions!

  • I will summarise each paragraph so 1ee fans don't have to read the over the extended runtime. 

    Paragraph 

    1. - poppa sees himself as better and more knowledgeable than most 1ee posters on football matters.

    2. Poppa says Mark O’Neill isn't to blame.

    3. All Parramatta fans are over estimating our jnrs ( EA Take note ) so nobody is to blame for the lack of development because our jnrs are just average and nothing out of the ordinary. 

    4. Mon is exonerated from recruitment failure,  the blame should be more on BA and Jason Ryles 

    5. Mon is doing a good job taking care of the people who take care of pathways 

    6. Sarantinos wasn’t employed football related problems. More financial, meaning Sarantinos is exonerated from all football related matters.

    7. Pop says, Sarantinos gave bushie the full reigns in football administraton, because Sarantinos knew nothing about it so Sarantinos is exonerated from all scapegoat blame.

    8.    Rambling

    9.  1ee posters have no idea how businesses work, so we can't make judgement on Sarantinos 

    10. Politicians aren't to blame because we voted them in

    11. Now pop is saying O'neill should walk after saying there should be no scapegoats 

    12. Poppa says Ryles could take O'neill's job

    13. Nonsensical/Senseless: Having no meaningful purpose

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Flow Basket replied to Die hard eels Supporter's discussion Just heard on triple M whisper that Eels and Dragons are monitoring the Luke Metcalf situation at the warriors
"Schuster is in similar situation as eels ,that's not good.can talk about props soon"
33 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner: SCAPEGOATS..... A funny thing, you can say it with a cry in your voice!......The Parra Lament
"I will summarise each paragraph so 1ee fans don't have to read the over the extended runtime. 
Paragraph 
1. - poppa sees himself as better and more knowledgeable than most 1ee posters on football matters.
2. Poppa says Mark O’Neill isn't to…"
44 minutes ago
Mannah-Brow replied to Die hard eels Supporter's discussion Just heard on triple M whisper that Eels and Dragons are monitoring the Luke Metcalf situation at the warriors
"Maybe it's for Moses? He isn't getting younger, doesn't need the money, is playing with a team of reserve graders and getting bashed each week. Can't be much fun for him and there is no premiership window before his contract ends.
 "
54 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner: SCAPEGOATS..... A funny thing, you can say it with a cry in your voice!......The Parra Lament
"What metrics are you using to conclude that he is failing in those 3 aspects of his role?"
3 hours ago
More…