Is this about TPA's and money in paper bags or are we still not viewed by the players as one of the better clubs?
How can the Knights and Sea Eagles be in the top 5?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I was on that wheel well before BA and Lomax came along LOL..... actually my birthday is only 9 days away, I'm gearing up for it with your reminder."
"I think it was on TCT comment section that someone realised Ryles never spoke about Lomax when it came to leadership, he said it was a collective but would rave about JAC, Moses, Paulo etc for their individual leadership. I mean a good observation…"
"Hoey, the Bus Test with Ivan Cleary is a good example..... its probably the best argument put up so far!"
"Chiefy, is this the same Chiefy who has BA and Coryn living rent free in his very vacant head.....the same one that just said "he's gone and your still blabbering on" LOL.
Want to add Lomax to that group, I suspect there is space left, given we are…"
Want to add Lomax to that group, I suspect there is space left, given we are…"
Replies
Why would anyone want to play for manly? I found it odd that jr. and klemmer didn't make the top 5 props. I think they are the best 2 props in the game
I'd say it is simply about the location being near the beach for Manly.
It's great to know we arent really rated by the competition yet. It will be at their own peril though.
This TEAM, and I use that word in its truest sense, is exactly that, a top class TEAM. No super stars just talented individuals playing for each other.
They are tough as they come, they play for one another and they never give up. I'm growing more confident about our chances with every passing week.
After reading the poll, I have a feeling it was submitted after a big Roosters win, hence the dominance.
A couple of questionable results...
Of course it would be the Roosters. They have a magical ability to pay everyone more and yet remain under the mysterious cap. Meanwhile the NRL ignore what everyone can see is wrong.