Current Perth Bears GM of football David Sharpe has not ruled out making a play for Zac Lomax, saying if the clause is cleared by Parramatta they would pursue him. Well issue is David you have nothing to offer us in order to waive the clauses. It is not like Sydney Roosters coming to us and saying they want Lomax and we can say we want Victor Radley in return for example. They would have nothing to give us. Now in 2028 could they as they have a roster and are a year in? Perhaps but wouldn't they just wait for another year and get him when his deal ends in 2029?
This is a nothing story, i put it up incase someone else chooses too. I wanted to get a head start and just drown it.
Replies
I wouldn't put it past him, he's a fruit loop
Not a coco pop or a rice bubble?
Yep.... all rolled into one 🫤
Every team will make a play mad if we let them
Well they can make a play but we want something in return. If we let him go for nothing in return then MON and the board will then have my support in getting them out immediately.
They've got no one to trade us if we release him from his contract. Good luck Perth ahah
Yeah exactly what i said, what can they give us to get it over the line? lol losers.
To be honest considering we are happy to be cucked by Brisbane and Anasta with Peasant , why wouldn't we tell Lomax to play for us in 2026 and we'll happily release him to Bears in 2027 .
What will we gain out of holding onto his rights for the next 3 years? A big fat nothing.
Ryles was happy for him to go. Id say the clause was more in place to save us getting shit on when this thing fell through for 2026 and he hypthetically signed with the Roosters for unders. If he signs with Perth for 2027 the club wont care.
You can use it as a bargaining chip. And you make another team stronger by releasing him.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next