Anasta 24.10 min
https://youtu.be/-Ly4UtWcy4g?si=FrcQ6McxrMSjS0ic
Watch the latest Anasta podcast-
Straight from the horses mouth, " Parramatta - Ryles, never offered Jonah Pezet a long-term deal" He says Parramatta only ever wanted Pezet for one year.
The conversation was always 1 yrar.
So all the talk about the club being used, and all the cuckold blogs, you can just flush them.
He also says the kids Parramatta have coming through are the succession plan.
Replies
Write him a letter cousin. Go ask him
You reckon. That will stand up in a court of law, your reckoning LB :)
Nah mate, she’s the franchise player. The others were just practice matches.
Oh Chief go away. You constantly tried to get me with a gotcha moment, weren't able to and now pulling a part details of my comments to try again.
Pity you don't have Mick here to fight your battles and call people names anymore.
I have intel on Lomax and the source was pretty spot on. How about yours in the past, remember Galvin? Saying he was always going to the Dogs and turns out i corrected you about Penrith wanting him first and had proof too?
That's a gotcha moment. Your one eyed affair for Ryles. BA could not do a single thing right and Ryles cannot do a single thing wrong. It seems, as MeeIk pointed out you lean towards things that suit your narrative. Supporting Ryles in evey little thing he does and saying it is genious justifies your hatred and criticism of BA.
Brother, I couldn't care less about the gotcha moment. Thats not how I operate. Yeah I support Ryles and what he's doing. What's the issue there LB.
I wasn't a ba supporter for a long while, and at the end, the collapse of the team's results proves that i was correct in not supporting him, not that I care about what anyone else thinks, just here to comment how I see it
You comment how you see it yet seem to turn a blind eye to evidence, that you asked for, that Anasta said what he said and claimed it was prompting that made him say it?
Not how you operate? Right but you ask me questions that you already have answers too, call what i said as BS despite me showing proof then say it is not what it seems as it does not match your opinion that is Ryles made a genious decision and we were not beaten to the punch by Brisbane and it was all part of the plan.
There are no issues liking Ryles, i like him as well. But I have never seen you mention anything negative, to which i may have missed earlier on. But though i do not know 100% but i am quite confident to say that if BA had made the Pezet deal you would have been abusing the decision non stop. That is where the issue is as you were so against BA that he could breathe the wrong way and he would be abused. I didn't like BA either but could admit he can coach and did do some good things over the years.
Hey i am same as you, a Ryles advocate and BA hater, though can admit positives and faults of them both too. At this stage i have not seen you knock Ryles and praise BA. Any praise for BA in the past and that person was an idiot, anyone say something negative against Ryles it is an insult. I feel similar to my comment that Anasta said yeah we wanted him long term, goes against Ryles call that we wanted him for one year and supports those knocking him.
Similar to your hatred for MON when BA was here, now he is still signing players and not really any mention of him from you. Whatever he signs Ryles has a hand in, would you say he might have done some good things or was it all BA when he was here?
Though i know you do not care what people think and it is a good quality to survive this site. Though it seems my replies have penetrated your skin since you say my comment wouldn't hold up in court.
These are your words above:
"Id put more trust in this latest more formal podcast"
Kinda looks like you are making judgement.
Right, so if someone said they did something illegal, then a few months later said loud and clear they didn't do it that means they are innocent?
Sorry Chief makes no sense what you are saying. You say do not jump to conclusions if we don't know the real answer yet seem adament in your post that you believe we never wanted Pezet long term? So are you jumping to a conclusion?
What's promoted by his mates got to do with it? You actually think Maitua pressured him into saying Parramatta wanted a long term deal? What does him giving into that pressure do for him and those in that situation? Nothing. Anasta seemed to have let it slip it seems.
Mate, im just asking you which one is correct? Your the one that said the second version is incorrect as Anasta is protecting the Eels
Prove it LB
He is also doing what is best for his client and he is mates with Ryles too. A lot of backlash over the deal, he is coming in saying this was the plan all along with no thought of long term where i am saying there definately was an interest long term and Pezet didn't want it so we decided to go with the one year deal as better than nothing.
Which one is correct? i think pretty self explanatory.
Prove it? Sure https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeI_Ok_9boQ skip to 13:27.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 6 Next