Parramatta have rejected Melbourne’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax on an immediate deal.

It is understood that the Storm requested permission from the Eels in recent weeks to talk with the NSW and Australian flyer.

The Eels instantly rejected the initial request based on the conditional release they granted Lomax in November. However those discussions are set to continue with the Storm still keen on landing the 26-year-old who is without a contract for this season.

The Eels retain Lomax’s rugby league rights despite agreeing to release him just 19 games into a four year deal at the end of last season.

Lomax requested – and was granted – an immediate exit from the Eels to pursue other opportunities. As part of that release, the Eels strictly stipulated that Lomax would not be able to play for any other NRL club until his contract expired at the end of 2028 but would be free to play any other code. Lomax agreed to the terms of the release.

At the time it was thought that Lomax would sign with rebel rugby competition R360. But since securing his early exit from Parramatta, R360 has been forced into a delayed start and will not be able to get off the ground until at least 2028.

The Storm play the Eels in round one to kick-start the competition following the Las Vegas double header.

Lomax has been searching for a new home ever since. He had flirted with rugby including stints in Japan, France or the US while Super Rugby clubs including the Force and Brumbies are keen to secure him.

However, he stands to earn about $400,000 if he opts to switch codes in Australia – well short of the $700,000 he was set to earn at Parramatta this year.

And well down on the $850,000 he would have pocketed if he remained at St George Illawarra before he was granted an early exit from the Dragons.

The prospect of playing rugby in Australia would give Lomax an opportunity to become a dual international. He would have been part of the Kangaroos’ Ashes squad had he not ruled himself out through injury.

The Storm suddenly have salary cap space given their recent departures of Ryan Papenhuyzen, Nelson Asofa-Solomona and Jonah Pezet.

The unfortunate injury to Eliesa Katoa – who won’t play this year – has also given the Storm some extra cap room too.

The Eels would be expected to ask for a player of Lomax’s ability to even consider allowing him to play against the club

The Eels have been unable to find a like for like replacement given how late in the year Lomax wanted out.

They secured Gold Coast centre Brian Kelly on a two-year deal on Monday.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yeah send over Coates and you can have him 🤣

  • Ask for Warbrick or Josiah Pahulu

    • Warbrick has some concussion history issues, Coates would be a great trade haha 

      In all seriousness, either Nick Meaney, Jack Howorth or Wishart would be good for the club. 

      • Meany has signed with bears so nothing to offer much Jack be good 

    • Why do we need to ask for Warbrick when we can tell Melbourne to go fark themselves and go pillage our own 7s outside back for ourselves.

      We give Melbourne nothing except the middle finger that includes Lomax's PA also.

  • Fcuk they have some hide!!!

  • Warbrick, Coates or Howarth please. Or tell Tino to come to us lol

    • Warbrick, Coates and Howarth please.

    • Just keep saying no fucking way

      • Just say Coates and nothing will ever happen lol, set the price so high nothing comes of it 🤣

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Stay strong don't let him off the hook unless we get something that's more beneficial for us but until then no we stand pat give Lomax's camp nothing.
I mean put it out there there make it even unrealistic if you want Zac it's Cameron or Xavier…"
32 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"Depth and Katoa is out for potentially a year.
If Melbourne are serious about moving on a kid that they've developed from nothing id say there mad.
If I were Melbourne I'd sitback and wait and see how court proceedings go I'm not breaking up my…"
49 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"EE, Not sure if that's an issue. Team Lomax would probably want to strongarm us into submission and an out-of-court settlement. Quickly. Personally, I like our odds in court, but in any case it may be in the club’s interests to drag this out a bit…"
2 hours ago
Joeyboyz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"Once again you've nailed it. It all sounds like more facebook clickbait shit to me and makes no sense at all.
 "
3 hours ago
More…