Parra signings

Why give up matterson for Carr all we need is a good centre 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Bring back the French 

  • We definitely need a winger to replace Russell and JAC is a top tier winger.

    If we have to give up a quality forward to get him, Matterson is the logical choice.

    JAC should be our priority and if we land him and still have some coin available, we can go about finding a better centre to replace Simonsson as neither him nor Harper are the answer.

    If we could snare Tass to go with JAC we suddenly have a top tier backline.

    Tass has a tackle efficiency of over 90% compared to Simonsson who is at just over 80%.

    • Tass could be playing Centre if Souths move Wighton to back-row or to Halfback. Both are bad choices but it could happen. Might make Tass hold out for it.

      But issue is Souths would want a forward in return also. I think now Parramatta are happy with Simonsson and Harper, with Talagi and R.Penisini nipping at their heels.

      • If the club wants to settle for average players like Simonsson and Harper, that's on them.

  • 12305520057?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • Well there goes that idea! BRL says no, but Lodge, Jenkins, Xerri can all come back. Absolute hypocrisy from the NRL as usual.

      • Have to agree, the heavyweight teams would have convinced the NRL but no not Parra.

    • It was different when the Rorters wanted Fergo back after his crime was far worse. Or Penrith with Taylan May. It seems if you bash a male the NRL views it as far more acceptable than allegedly putting hands on a woman. Sexism at its finest. Equality is a stance the NRL choose when they want to abide by it seems. 

      • And you don't think bashing a woman is worse than bashing a man?, didn't see you as a weak gutted dog person wiz.

        • In principal yes , but by black and white laws , it shouldn't be .  And the NRL when making these decisions go by the law .  You're setting a standard wheras a males rights to not be assaulted are worth less than a woman's . 

          The fact you drew from my comment  the conclusion you did is the problem .  It's not about me saying you should be able to assault a woman , it's about me saying you shouldn't be able to get off scott free for assaulting a male .  The NRL preaches equality, however they're given a free pass when it comes to not abiding by it .  As we all know , equality in reality actually means extending more rights to females than males . 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to CarloEEL2's discussion Scouting report - today’s Tele
"Even after his slow start to 2025, Kautoga ended up leading all our forwards in post contact metre percentage.
He made giant strides until he was grounded against Penrith.Can only see him getting stronger and making bigger inroads next year.Kautoga…"
10 minutes ago
EA replied to CarloEEL2's discussion Scouting report - today’s Tele
"Yea they recon Bloomfield and Risati are better union players than league and being selected in the u17 wallabies side showed it. So easier team for them to make professionally.
However, I wouldn't be to fast saying Bloomfield wont make NRL if he…"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to CarloEEL2's discussion Scouting report - today’s Tele
"The article, via Archive Today: https://archive.md/BMSIB"
2 hours ago
paul taylor replied to CarloEEL2's discussion Scouting report - today’s Tele
"EA, 
Bloomfield will go RU because he wont make NRL IMO. Risati needs to knuckle down this year. Can play but I cant see him ahead of Lorenzo, Fletcher at this stage. "
2 hours ago
More…