One on one strip rule

They need to get rid of the one on one strip rule. It's become rediculous and it destroys the momentum of the game. 

If they are not careful it has the potential to ruin the free flowing style of the game with players becoming more concerned with just having to hang on to the ball rather than looking for offloads. 

Plus we always seem to be on the wrong end of it. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I don’t mind the rule I just don’t like it when 3 players tackle the ball runner, one player gets their hands around the ball where they need it tell the other two to drop off and yank it out, shouldn’t be legal unless it has always been a one on one tackle

    • I agree, should be a tweak in the rule.

  • Agree and it is quite clear they are coaching it for players to drop off as one person holds the ball. However in the meantime we also need to take advantage of it and learn how to stop it being down to us and do it to them

  • Couldn’t have said it better!!

     

  • Bullshite it’s a great rule, League needs more contests for the ball in general play! 

  • Go back to the way it was. One on one is fine but if anyone else is involved in the tackle at any stage then it's a penalty.

  • Refs just need to call held when a player is held. If two drop off and a third steals it, then it's still a penalty because it's after the held call. If a player is flat footed, is not moving forward and is held by three (giant) blokes then he is held and a rake can't take place. Easy fix. Otherwise it does indeed ruin the flow and might even, in time, take out one of the game's most exciting plays, the offload.

  • I called this immediately when I heard of the rule change. It was so obvious this was going to happen. Either the NRL wanted to see these deliberate type strips every week OR they are so freaking dumb they can’t see the obvious. 

    Anyway it’s now a rule so we need to practice it and become good at it. 

  • The constant intent focus on stripping the ball will spoil the game BIG-TIME. It's better to legally smash hard to force the ball out but the NRL is making our game safe for ballerinas to play and with cameras looking from so many angles and video replays leading to sin bins, suspensions and with huge penalties/fines hanging over their heads, players and coaches will mostly shy away from the real brute side of the game and prefer the piss weak, less risk taking, antsy pantsy approach of ripping the ball out. It has to stop. One on one ONLY - any second MAN in and you can't strip the ball from that point onwards.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Flegg win against Storm
"Some players need to get sacked from a club and risk losing it all before they really knuckle down and put in the work.  Why did he get sacked, was it lack of discipline for footy and training or off field issues?"
40 minutes ago
Parraboy replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Flegg win against Storm
"Nah I didn't watch the game I don't have too watch one game for my statement to be made I've seen enough in 2 years. His overrated"
2 hours ago
LB replied to EA's discussion Your Line up for next week?
"I love Twidle, you can just tell he is not a robotic NRL player, he plays with instincts. Not saying he is Munster, but Munster plays the same. Apa gets the ball, looks to see what is infront of him and says "Let's try this". That can be dangerous…"
2 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to EA's discussion Your Line up for next week?
"Iongi
Samrani
Simonsson
Penisini
Russell
Pezet
Moses
Williams
Smith
Moretti
Kautoga
Guymer
Doorey
Walker
Paulo
Tuivaiti
Latu if Ryles thinks he is ready
Izack Tago if we get him
Twidle

 
I thought I posted this earlier including explanations but…"
2 hours ago
More…