NRL reject dispensation

The NRL has rejected Parramatta’s request for Salary Cap Dispensation.

The club has asked for dispensation following a number of injuries to top 30 players.

Parra has lost 3 players for the season and others for several weeks.

3 of the players lost long term were due to acts of foul play where the players committed the foul play were sin binned and suspended.

Blowtorch? Grudge? Nah it's all above board. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I mean I would have done the same thing. The NRL doesn't want to open this particular can of worms.

    Our only shot at this was a backroom deal with the higher ups in the NRL, as soon as we spoke out of turn to the media I knew we were cooked.

    Looked a bit rookie, but nothing lost and nothing gained.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mallee57 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"Agree Vegas is V'Landys peach pie. Doesn't benefit the Eels one bit. Tell him to stick it where the sun don't shine"
44 seconds ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Would an early Christmas Card suffice and a scratchy "
4 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"Clearly shows how Gough really stuffed up. Is it honest ignorance on his part not knowing the actual tackle rule or does he consider himself that authoritarian that not one single tackle is completed in every game until a referee calls held. That is…"
11 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Oh, forgot to mention, there is a finders fee paid to 1EE of:"
1 hour ago
More…