NRL reject dispensation

The NRL has rejected Parramatta’s request for Salary Cap Dispensation.

The club has asked for dispensation following a number of injuries to top 30 players.

Parra has lost 3 players for the season and others for several weeks.

3 of the players lost long term were due to acts of foul play where the players committed the foul play were sin binned and suspended.

Blowtorch? Grudge? Nah it's all above board. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We should have just took them all to fucking court, all the evidence have show so much of how corrupt and how this sport is the biggest money laundering sport in the world. 

  • Of course they did.
    Mind you, it's not the NRL's fault that we have such slim stocks of quality NRL players. That's MON's fault.

  • Typical NRL hierarchy. Clearly obvious that Parramatta Eels are not in the NRL good books and won't be getting a Christmas Card anytime soon. It just validates how deep the NRL Corrupt Rabbit Hole really is 

  • Did any of us really think it would be successful?

    • NO

  • There's only one way to beat the nrl.  Beat them on the feild.  We won't reach that stage until we have intelligent operators like Richardson running the club

     

    • Bring back Fitzy

    • lol you think Richo would change the NRL being against us? They'll find a way if it is happening.

  • Wow 

    wouldn't it be a shame if someone leaked some documents from lomax case like text messages to someone like smh Kate mc clymont 🤔

  • Disappointing to be honest.   I know South Sydney had a similar injury crisis last year and they werent granted one either. YES, foul play involved but they dont hand them out willy nilly.   If we lose another back in next few weeks it will be catastropic to our chances. We simply do not have a top 30 quality squad to handle the loss of 3-5 starters. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"You are the only one one here who thinks he left on his own accord.  Sarantinos said himself he sees himself as a future ceo at another club at some stage.   If that was the case,  why would Sarantinos leave the eels in such a lowly position?   …"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Brad was about saving himself. 
- The way reserve grade was turned into.a holding yard for drifters rather than concentrate on development.  That was criminal 
- the choices he made not to have better assistants who could challenge him further down…"
1 hour ago
JEELman replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Swings and roundabouts. It's just magnified because of the finals.
 "
1 hour ago
Bourbon Man replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"I agree with you Wiz. The Dogs cut him loose because he was on big money, was carrying too much weight and was out with injury too often.
With us, he has lost the weight, has been relatively injury free, is teaching the younger players, is a clear…"
1 hour ago
More…