Bulldogs have pulled out of the race for Metcalf and his asking price is around 1 million dollars. Dragons most likely spot but to get him immediately I wonder if this means they will allow Sua to join us early to free up cap space to get Metcalf immediately. Just seems logical
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Thats 100% correct Joel, Daniel Anderson is only new there and will make them better. Whilst we stick with the three stooges
Who would the apologists prefer, Daniel Anderson or Mark O'neill.
Anderson has done more in a few months than O'neill did in.8 years here, and thats totally on Sarantinos as the ceo.
Sorry Chiefy, which one are you again?
Remind me again why Anderson is no longer at this club.
Let me tell you something Super, without a great jnr system and having the person's in charge to identify and sign the best ones long term, Parramatta will be bottom 4 for the next decade.
The club isn't going to buy itself out of this.
Also, by the way Ryles is talking about those above him, constantly saying things are above his pay grade, tells me that something isn't right between him and what's happening above him.
I could be wrong but its happened a few times
You can talk about why Richardson isn't great, or Anderson, but you make a zero case on why O'neill is still at Parramatta
Write a blog on why mark o'neill should be retained at Parramatta super, then we can debate it, but you won't .im betting
Ooh, can I help? So, Chiefy wants Daniel Anderson back as GM so the Eels can go spoon, 10th, 12th? Oh yeah, also so that the Eels can breach the salary cap, get fined half a million, and get docked competition points.
Please, Chiefy, we would all really love to hear why THAT is the kind of management you want at the club?
Well Anderson is Head of recruitment. MON is GM. Two different roles.
So shouldn't you be asking who do we prefer out of Anderson and Rogers?
They've over paid on more than a few.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next