Replies

    • Absolutely Meelk. Good points. It sucks that all this speculation starts so early to circumvent  the Nov 1 rule for the year prior to expiry - take Guts resigning saga started back in May - it’s so soon for it to start over and so much can happen in players form and Chinese dinners in the interim too. 

      and as you say, it’d be a smart ploy by Warriors as much as I don’t like it...haha can’t imagine how they are reeling with egg on face much about Papali’i tho

      on a side note they have some big money signings themselves tho so if they can afford it what can’t we?

      • Mace, that is the same point.....we still have 30 players to divide into the "cake" its only the mix that can change.

        The problem comes with the players rising within the current year in terms of value.....Papallii being no greater example. If we have any money left from this year i.e. Jennings was never officially replaced, then I assume that some players have been front ended in this season towards next.

        Then there is your and my favourites the TPA's...... we surely should be in that game now with the new found respect, Bank West as a vehicle, the highest numbers in a supporter base all add up to be a very attractive team (players within) to endorse.

  • I don't know why the Warriors didn't go hard with huge money on a couple of halves. They could of spent a million each on Milford and Sandow who wants back in the NRL. Combine them with the big money forwards Kane Evans and Matt Lodge and look out. No money left.

  • Words fail me...

     

  • Would not like to see this happen, but no one is irreplaceble

  • If he wants to go he will go

    • exactly

  • NO!!!

  • I'm going to fucking cry if this happens. Please don't do this.

  • Doesn't prove that he will go. All it means is that Parra will need to make a decent offer to retain him, which I'm sure the club is in the process of doing. If that is in fact Niukore who liked the post, he might be just giving the club a hurry-along. Don't panic people!

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I can't recall seeing a flag in recent times after the Brett incident. Now I know why, thanks Super.
Geez, Brett used it as a genius trolling weapon though. The consequences are still being felt.
 "
9 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"No. He was the only one who refused after I gave him 4 months to swap it. He said he wasn't changing and he'd cop the ban.
I've gone back 8 years and 1,000 members and Brett was the only one with an Israeli or Palestinian flag. He'd also been warned…"
25 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"Yes, Super & mods were probably naive at one point in allowing flag avatars. That was then.
Brett showed we need the Brett Rule.
He showed, even despite being gone, how powerful a trolling weapon a flag can be. A genius trolling strategy. It creates…"
29 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I am not on the "Hook" You seem to be asking all the questions of late......Do you mind telling me why I am "on the Hook"
I have read your comments and you keep repeating the same questions, my guess is your posts are contributory to angst and offer…"
53 minutes ago
More…