Eels Blogs

Luke Brooks

Posted by Adam Magrath on June 23, 2022 at 6:36am

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★

Votes: 0

Email me when people reply –

Replies

- - - - Brett Allen > Gaz Nelson June 23, 2022 at 9:59pm
        
        It's the salary floor. It's in the CBA, it's too ensure that's the players get their agreed share of the games revenue.
        
        Gaz Nelson > Brett Allen June 24, 2022 at 9:35pm
        
        Ah yep .. makes sense Brett
  - MeelK > Ruprecht Amadeus Mozart June 23, 2022 at 11:28am
    
    He's a thief. He should be locked up for robbing the Tigers for so long.
Anguillidae June 23, 2022 at 11:22am

I don't think so. Maybe at The Wall?
This reply was deleted.
- EA June 23, 2022 at 5:44pm
  
  How are you still persisting that D Brown should be 9? What have you been watching this year?
  - This reply was deleted.
    - Gaz Nelson June 23, 2022 at 7:40pm
      
      He'd be a game changer at hooker. Moses runs the team from 7, this would see him more involved
      - Poppa > Gaz Nelson June 23, 2022 at 8:48pm
        
        What makes you so impressed with Perham Grunts, he has been nothing but average in everything I have seen from 5/8. fullback and wing. If he was playing fullback he would be the worst fullback in FG Football.....cannot think of anyone that would come in behind him?
      - Brett Allen > Gaz Nelson June 24, 2022 at 7:07am
        
        Absolutely not. Dylan does his best work when he can isolate the A & B defenders and use his left step. You put him in at dummy half and you lose what makes him special.
ParraPride June 23, 2022 at 1:01pm

Fak no!

He can be ball boy or something on the side for the eels if he wants to come.
- Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 > ParraPride June 23, 2022 at 1:08pm
  
  The only fan who wants him at parramatta is Brett Allen. Glad his not on the recruitment committee

of 10

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax

"page not found.
Can't say i appreciated you linking to paywalled news ltd anyhow
"

LB replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta

"As you said BE, the 10 year ban could very well be threatened and acted on. However, could the NRL be on to say to Melbourne that they could act on it, if they want him make a deal. Melbourne, if desperate enough and want this to not go further…"

ParraEels replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta

"Is anyone else noticing the media slowly shifting to help the NRL and storm strong-arm us. Many of them are starting to say how going through the courts is going to hurt us and isn't a good look because we are depriving the game of Lomax?
I hope we…"

Muttman replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta

"I don't think the courts can assign value either. For them it's just a question of the validity of the terms of the release. Ie) are they reasonable and therefore enforceable. In that sense I believe the Eels are in an extremely strong position. The…"