I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
EA > Graham polkinghorneOctober 12, 2024 at 10:47am
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
"The storm got into Lomaxs head by saying we will get this done, they've hung the carrot in front of him thinking parra will back down even after they encouraged the NRL to publicly back them. What they didn't count on was the underbelly of Parra…"
"Bluey, Badger and Macey,
The NSW Supreme Court could uphold the restraint and still trim it. So we'd win in principle, but Lomax could be cleared to play earlier than 31 October 2028.
A pivot issue could be how the court see our 'alleged rejection'…"
"Yep Badger, that sounds about right. If the Eels hold Zac's legal registered rights 2006-2008 to play NRL, then the Storm contract would be considered invalid as it goes against the strict conditions of the Eels release contract.
If the court was to…"
Replies
He is on 300k at Knights, easily affordable for eels
Well he would want a big upgrade. $500k is well worth it for him.
Woof woof 🐶
Don't think we need another prop, but I'm a fan
Naaah. I really don't want anymore forwards, unless its an edge.
EDIT: let me add that this not because I don't rate him. I think he's actually quite a good player. But I think we have other priorities.
I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
Do people on here try to spell peoples names wrong on purpose? Happens like everyday... surely Thompson ain't a hard one.
Like how people say Longi?
You tellem , Juck.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next