JAC still on our radar

JAC is still on EELS radar i hear. We met with his management last week again. Gus needs to approve

Dont be surprised he is an eel 2024

stuff goin on in the background

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Source? Every post here without a source should be ignored.

    • All due respect to your comment, how can we name a source on an open forum that media, players, club officials read?

      i have no problem if u choose to ignore. Many will.. 

       

      • You don't need to drop names, but at least somewhat explain how you heard of this?

        For example, "from a member within the club" or "from associate with a current player". Something! Otherwise, it's just waffle.

        • Id just ignore it if you feel that way PB1

  • You say Gus needs to approve, have the Dogs even given JAC permission to negotiate?

    • i think Gus has said to his manager, if you can discreetly find a good offer, put it to us and go from there

  • J A C would be a disruptive unit,anyone that has his mouth shut tight when the National anthem is being sung does not need to be any where near our club 

    • That's a beat up by the media. I don't sing the anthem because I don't really sing anything. I love my country.

    • Is he that much of a nuisance? If you keep a lid on him he is fine. He has not been terrific off-field but not that bad compared to so many others. I would argue Corey Norman did worse here than JAC has done in his career.

      •  agree, i dont think JAC is an issue. Think media made it worse, same like Latrell

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

SuperEel 22 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club
"Email was sent yesterday. Should be from Parramatta Leagues Club Ltd, not Parramatta Leagues Directors."
7 minutes ago
Muttman replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club
"The usual suspects. They need to get a hobby.
I may be going crazy as I can't see any link to vote in that email. I see 2 links - AGM page, Pitt-town Amalgamation page."
16 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"The purpose of the article was to be an article. Content baby, yeah. It is adding a slant to an article that was going to run anyways. It is not a straight up placed hit-piece"
24 minutes ago
Axel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"I noticed these subtleties as well DAZ but what is the pupose of this article except as a click bait, it tells nothing really? is trying to sway public opinion, which is overwhlemingly in our favour? or trying to influence the decision of the…"
35 minutes ago
More…