JAC still on our radar

JAC is still on EELS radar i hear. We met with his management last week again. Gus needs to approve

Dont be surprised he is an eel 2024

stuff goin on in the background

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Source? Every post here without a source should be ignored.

    • All due respect to your comment, how can we name a source on an open forum that media, players, club officials read?

      i have no problem if u choose to ignore. Many will.. 

       

      • You don't need to drop names, but at least somewhat explain how you heard of this?

        For example, "from a member within the club" or "from associate with a current player". Something! Otherwise, it's just waffle.

        • Id just ignore it if you feel that way PB1

  • You say Gus needs to approve, have the Dogs even given JAC permission to negotiate?

    • i think Gus has said to his manager, if you can discreetly find a good offer, put it to us and go from there

  • J A C would be a disruptive unit,anyone that has his mouth shut tight when the National anthem is being sung does not need to be any where near our club 

    • That's a beat up by the media. I don't sing the anthem because I don't really sing anything. I love my country.

    • Is he that much of a nuisance? If you keep a lid on him he is fine. He has not been terrific off-field but not that bad compared to so many others. I would argue Corey Norman did worse here than JAC has done in his career.

      •  agree, i dont think JAC is an issue. Think media made it worse, same like Latrell

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Parraborn1 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"I'd argue that nobody wants Lomax except for Melbourne who are desperate for short-term acquisitions. "
29 minutes ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"that's on Lomax, his agent and his legal team, not Parramatta. If R360 made promises to him they couldn't fulfil, its on Lomax to take R360 to court. "
56 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"If you lost Joliffe would you replace him with Matto?....it's like replacing your car with a banana"
57 minutes ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"R360 didn't exist at all when Lomax requested, and obtained, the release. It still doesn't. Lomax never had a contract there, as neither did any other player, including RTS. So, Lomax doesn't have an argument that his circumstances have changed. And…"
59 minutes ago
More…