JAC still on our radar

JAC is still on EELS radar i hear. We met with his management last week again. Gus needs to approve

Dont be surprised he is an eel 2024

stuff goin on in the background

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Source? Every post here without a source should be ignored.

    • All due respect to your comment, how can we name a source on an open forum that media, players, club officials read?

      i have no problem if u choose to ignore. Many will.. 

       

      • You don't need to drop names, but at least somewhat explain how you heard of this?

        For example, "from a member within the club" or "from associate with a current player". Something! Otherwise, it's just waffle.

        • Id just ignore it if you feel that way PB1

  • You say Gus needs to approve, have the Dogs even given JAC permission to negotiate?

    • i think Gus has said to his manager, if you can discreetly find a good offer, put it to us and go from there

  • J A C would be a disruptive unit,anyone that has his mouth shut tight when the National anthem is being sung does not need to be any where near our club 

    • That's a beat up by the media. I don't sing the anthem because I don't really sing anything. I love my country.

    • Is he that much of a nuisance? If you keep a lid on him he is fine. He has not been terrific off-field but not that bad compared to so many others. I would argue Corey Norman did worse here than JAC has done in his career.

      •  agree, i dont think JAC is an issue. Think media made it worse, same like Latrell

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

CarloEEL2 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R3: Danger Game as Desperate Dragons Hunt First Win (Jack De Belin Cut)
"This will definitely make me nervous 
When Moses is off goal kicking he is really " off" "
36 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to fake midget pseudoachondroplasia's discussion 6 agains exposed
"I heard a journo on NRL360 the other day saying that conceding 6-agains must not be determining matches because teams like Panthers and Storm rank high for conceding 6-agains. This view is very misinformed. The Rugby League Eye Test has shown that…"
40 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to fake midget pseudoachondroplasia's discussion 6 agains exposed
"It's the legally illegal way of the NRL calling the shots and outcome of matches. Corruption at its subtle best
 "
54 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to fake midget pseudoachondroplasia's discussion 6 agains exposed
"So many teams are scoring 40 points these days. That feels very different to bygone eras. I don't like it."
1 hour ago
More…