JAC still on our radar

JAC is still on EELS radar i hear. We met with his management last week again. Gus needs to approve

Dont be surprised he is an eel 2024

stuff goin on in the background

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Source? Every post here without a source should be ignored.

    • All due respect to your comment, how can we name a source on an open forum that media, players, club officials read?

      i have no problem if u choose to ignore. Many will.. 

       

      • You don't need to drop names, but at least somewhat explain how you heard of this?

        For example, "from a member within the club" or "from associate with a current player". Something! Otherwise, it's just waffle.

        • Id just ignore it if you feel that way PB1

  • You say Gus needs to approve, have the Dogs even given JAC permission to negotiate?

    • i think Gus has said to his manager, if you can discreetly find a good offer, put it to us and go from there

  • J A C would be a disruptive unit,anyone that has his mouth shut tight when the National anthem is being sung does not need to be any where near our club 

    • That's a beat up by the media. I don't sing the anthem because I don't really sing anything. I love my country.

    • Is he that much of a nuisance? If you keep a lid on him he is fine. He has not been terrific off-field but not that bad compared to so many others. I would argue Corey Norman did worse here than JAC has done in his career.

      •  agree, i dont think JAC is an issue. Think media made it worse, same like Latrell

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"Mutts, well said. I wouldn't be surprised if that's being discussed behind closed doors. It's ironic in some ways, we'd be more okay with Lomax playing for the Warriors than the Storm. "
12 seconds ago
macybrown replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"Guess if he says he didn't, it might be just a smartarse way of saying there's nothing evidentury tho :(
we all know he would've responded to that rubbish ...perhaps in a phone call."
1 minute ago
Muttman replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"Barnett from the Warriors opens up an interesting scenario. Warriors could take Lomax today and we get Barnett. If Lomax refuses then he has zero chance of claiming that he's being restrained. If I'm Parra I'm already trying to put this deal…"
6 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"...either way it goes HOE, both the club and our Atticus win the moral victory for all of us ;)
but damn I hope we can win both 🤞"
7 minutes ago
More…