JAC still on our radar

JAC is still on EELS radar i hear. We met with his management last week again. Gus needs to approve

Dont be surprised he is an eel 2024

stuff goin on in the background

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Source? Every post here without a source should be ignored.

    • All due respect to your comment, how can we name a source on an open forum that media, players, club officials read?

      i have no problem if u choose to ignore. Many will.. 

       

      • You don't need to drop names, but at least somewhat explain how you heard of this?

        For example, "from a member within the club" or "from associate with a current player". Something! Otherwise, it's just waffle.

        • Id just ignore it if you feel that way PB1

  • You say Gus needs to approve, have the Dogs even given JAC permission to negotiate?

    • i think Gus has said to his manager, if you can discreetly find a good offer, put it to us and go from there

  • J A C would be a disruptive unit,anyone that has his mouth shut tight when the National anthem is being sung does not need to be any where near our club 

    • That's a beat up by the media. I don't sing the anthem because I don't really sing anything. I love my country.

    • Is he that much of a nuisance? If you keep a lid on him he is fine. He has not been terrific off-field but not that bad compared to so many others. I would argue Corey Norman did worse here than JAC has done in his career.

      •  agree, i dont think JAC is an issue. Think media made it worse, same like Latrell

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mitchy replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Daz, it was simple, I implied your answer was wrong and that is my view, as you mentioned Lib policies. I base my views on my own thoughts / ideas. 
NDIS has been proven to have been a failure in its current method; another one. We have different…"
3 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"OK, Mitchy, how many receive welfare? You've implied this is easy to state so I take it you're able to state it? Is it:
A) 50%, or B) 20%, or C) 10% ???
Or if you cannot say exactly despite implying it's easy to state exactly, which from A, B or C…"
5 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Gents, we're drifting into socio-politics. This is not the place to discuss pointy topics like Welfare and Immigration. Let's put our foot off the peddle, please. We don't want to close the blog or start deleting posts if it escalates."
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"They will, question is by year 2 or 3 how many of those signings see it out."
30 minutes ago
More…