Gough & THAT Capt challenge

Did Gough make a mistake in the "can't Captains Challenge" incident (Williams' almost-try) with 2:56 remaining in the first half against the Tigers Round 5? Is that and other referring indiscretions - basically orchestrating thee game - why Gough has been dropped for Round 6? And the Moses warning letter is a smokescreen to cover up an awful refereeing performance?

At least, how are we to interpret the Captains Challenge rule? Has an inconsistency in it just been unearthed? I'm interested in clear expositions of how the following chain of reasoning is WRONG. That is, that I am wrong and the ref got it all right  

Context: Williams has picked up a loose ball, ran 30-40m, and got close to line the Tigers line before being set upon by three Tigers defenders. Williams gets up to play the ball and Korisau (sp?) comes from behind and knocks the ball out. Agreed facts. 
- Gough tells Moses that because he had "not ruled the tackle complete" it's a lost ball. That he won't win a challenge. This seems to suggest Gough is saying Moses cannot challenge a decision to "play on"? But if Gough has not called tackle complete nor has he ruled play on?
- Both Ryles and Moses in the press conference say they suspect Williams will have been called for a double movement if he dived over to score. I cannot attach the photos (getting a "file too large" error) but Williams' ball-carrying arm AND the ball touch the ground and at least one Tiger (Doihei) has his hands on Williams at that point. Freeze frame the footage to verify. So as best I can tell a double movement was in fact in play? Also Williams is 100% steadying to play the ball: the ball has been swapped from right to left arm while getting up and his right foot is outstretched in a play the ball not diving forward stance. 
- Now look at the rules for Captains Challenge below. There was a change in possession resulting in a structured restart (scrum; Tigers feed), which CAN be challenged. Also look at the rules for when a player is tackled  Williams satisfied both conditions A and D  

My interpretation is that Gough failed to call held as required. Note if it was a surrender tackle, which the "sole responsibility of the referee to identify", he would have identified it. I think Gough then confused himself that it was a play on rather than a structured restart condition. 

Note that IF Gough's reasoning was solid here, we would NOT be seeing strips identified by Captains Challenge?

31128561295?profile=RESIZE_710x31128561477?profile=RESIZE_710x

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Refs need to front the media like the coaches do 

    • They'd spend hours explaining all their errors

      • Annesley used to do a weekly 45-60 min discussion. We have to wonder why V'Landys nixed that?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Axel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Ideal target to pair with Moses
"Even if Burton is available and we are interested, MON will surely f*ck that up LOL"
22 seconds ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"Annesley used to do a weekly 45-60 min discussion. We have to wonder why V'Landys nixed that?"
7 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Ideal target to pair with Moses
"But then we are in the same position as bulldogs, paying quality 5/8 wages for a centre. The only centre I'd pay that money for is Herbie "
7 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"Nice sarcasm, re: AI use, Poppa. Though as an aside, I had looked at some media discussion of the incident and while a few raised doubts about Gough's performance, the 'held' call issue was taken at face value. So I wondered from where is that…"
10 minutes ago
More…