Would you fans be happy for BA to get the sack even the main players have a clause to leave if BA is sacked? I'm hearing Moses, Gutho and DBrown who has a options for the next 30yrs have these clauses in their contracts. Almost guarantee they wouldn't activate theses clauses if Bennett was incoming.
Simple Yes or No
BIG YES from me
Replies
That's for me to know mate.
What do you accomplish stirring shit?
It would be a bit hypocritical by our board to put those clauses in their contracts after denying Lomax, saying we don't do them. In other words, you are FOS.
Is that you Brad?
Maybe his brother....
Still haven't answered, you know this how?, or are you full of excrement.
You don't seriously expect me to give up my source do you Mrs Arthur?
Typical flog, your name says it all..Anal is.
How dare you Michael!!!! 😂
100% yes.
If they gave a shit about Parra they would not care if he was shown the door. Garbage links like that in contracts just smack of an intricate web of self protection being put ahead of what they are all actually being paid to do. Length of contracts, due off timing, clauses like that i.e. reciprocal if he goes I go rubbish... it all reads like a preservation setup.
As much as people might say BA is diehard Parra, I think he is smarter than many give credit for and ensuring a nice setup for him and his 2 sons was a big priority. Maybe, maybe not... but regardless... Parra need a break from all things Arthur.
I dare say too, if Clint Eastwood was hired, no player would be going anywhere and instead we've have players wanting to come here.
I read a story other players (I assume Gutho, Moses and few others) tried getting these clauses just as Lomax asked but all were refused.
1 of the few things the club have gotten right
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next