that is all that GF was.
fucken refereeing was disgraceful
Wighton should be Churchill Medalist
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"If he had serious Premiership aspirations I'd suggest he'd take less and stay with the dogs.If your talking securing your future I'd be taking those endless Perth millions and quick smart.Get Perth to relocate his family and away he goes for the…"
"Gotta love this guy, ultimate bludger "
"I'd be interested to hear people's thoughts on signing a 31 year old prop coming off a full acl reconstruction in exchange for Lomax when the court case was only settled yesterday. Yeah great idea, we've just bought ourselves 2 years and blow it in…"
Replies
Was a great try and a great finish. The commentators and the fams ruined it, not the refs
I think it was great refereeing, the referee got the call right and roosters went 90m to score. Was absolutely brilliant what a try. Canberra not good enough to defend that try they dont deserve to win it...
Great refereeing?
The decision by the dominant referee should never have been changed.
Raiders were awarded 6 again.
They played to that decision.
At the end of the day, it Canberra score overturn the ruling.
How many times has an obstruction been let go if it doesn’t lead to a try?
The referees decision led to an unfair advantage to the Roosters. Canberra could of had a repeat set had they been advised it was the last tackle.
If you have played the game before, you would know you go to ground when given a tackle restart.
As per the trainers indiscretion in the first half, what should of happened?
Scrum with the loose head and the feed to the attacking team. Yes Canberra should have had the loose head & feed as they were the attacking team.
Refereeing was poor
I can’t believe after all this bullshit has happened no one understands the rules. It should have been a loose head and feed to the Raiders as the referee indicated an incorrect decision during live play. Advantage needs to go to the attacking team
Read my post again before you tell me I don’t know the rules. I’m a qualified referee and coach, are you?
I’m talking about the change in ruling from the 6 again call HKF.
I’m not disputing the charge down and interference by the trainer, that was just bad luck. Additionally you are incorrect as the player attacked the ball not Keary’s legs. (Did he not get the ball in the charge down?)
I’m disputing the change in decision that directly misled the attacking team into believing the tackle count had restarted.
If Cummings was not sure that the ball had been played at, he should never have indicated the tackle count had restarted. The referee directly interfered with the play with an incorrect decision. No different to the trainer interfering with the play.
the decision should have been a scrum with loose & feed to the attacking team.
Truly, read it again, I state "as per" that decision.
I never stated the charge down decision was incorrect.
I'm not wrong
Yes mate, probably could have worded it better. I was posting like I would be talking, not really grammatically correct.
Rule 16.9
9. The Referee judges on matters of fact and shall not subsequently alter those judgments. He may cancel any decision made if prior foul play of which he had no knowledge is reported to him by a Touch Judge.
There was no foul play, hence the original 6 again should have stood.
Was every forward pass from acting half pulled up? Was every offside pulled up? Would Papalli have scored if he wasn’t tackled without the ball?
Bingo
Spot on.
The NRL said they got the decision right, they didn't, they got two decisions wrong.
The first one everyone can live with, the second one was disgraceful.
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
of 10 Next