Forward Pack Ratings

I was listening to Scott Sattler and Matt Rogers tonight, who rated their top eight forward packs on paper for next year. Neither of them rated our pack in the top eight. They even made specific mention of RCG now at the Titans. Yes, he is gone, get over it as I will be told and so be it. Our forwards were imo our strength for the past four of five years. Yes, they could both be proven wrong and I hope they are , but for our pack to not to be rated in the top 8 by two experienced subject matter experts is worrying.  I don't perceive bias from either of these guys. I hope this stuff motivates the forward pack to prove them all wrong.  The modern game needs impact forwards and a pack that endlessly hunts in defence. I always rated our pack and was surprised to see them not even mentioned in the top eight packs.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • 🤣😂 "experienced subject matter experts" 😂🤣

  • We finished second last this past season - you could say we didn't have a top 8 forward pack then either. You can see where the club is going with this team now though, and the players they have brought in have been in an attempt to modernise the squad. We do still have some very good forwards on paper, but Ryles needs to extract the best out of them consistently.

    I don't take much notice of what the "experts" say, but we'll see what transpires this coming season and next.

  • our forwards weren't the best last year but with our backs making 6m or less per carry they were always  exhausted and looked better from set starts I.e. penalties.

    Put any of our forwards in penriths pack and they'll look better

    • 100%   the weakest part of our pack the last couple of years were our back 3. 

  • We already paid a price for being to top-heavy in the forwards the last 2 season we were gargage mobile fit packs are the way with the concussion rules and sin bins rules in place 

  • Sounds about right. We won 7 games last year and weve lost RCG. Its up to the pack to get their act together and improve under Ryles.

    A lot of work to get our pack into the top 8 I would think.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

will replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Ryles is wanting speed.
He wants fast mobile forwards and speedy backs
Howarth does tick a box for the 6 man interchange. 
A 2nd rower who can play centre could be valuable "
53 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I have a feeling Melbourne will go cold on this now that we have called their bluff. Not sure where that leaves the situation. It's unfathomable what Schifcofske has done here. What's more baffling is that the media seems to have left him alone. "
54 minutes ago
Eel for life replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Totally support the club and the way they've handled things in this scenario. We have to give them credit where credit is due. We're quick to critisise when they get something wrong, so we should be quick to give them credit when they do something…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"One of the issues with Howarth for Lomax is that if we set aside that it's not an appropriate value exchange (all remarks about rep status etc) we are still left with an unknown. Specifically, what does Ryles want in an outside back?
We don't have…"
1 hour ago
More…