Replies

          • So you take the 2 names  Simmoeel0891 posted as being the disgruntled payers and you assume that's correct; even though he didn't provide any proof or a source. Then you carry on with the rumour as if it's true by justifying it with your own rational. What's even worse, you and others discuss it as if it's fact.

            Can't you see how you're just adding to the noise without saying anything?!?!?

          • This reply was deleted.
            • This reply was deleted.
      • RCG had player option so no offer required. He didn't take it. 

        He wants a longer contract from 2023 - that is all.

      • RCG is not off contract, he had an option in his favour which he declined. 

  • Can confirm that this is absolutely not true. I know a lot of the fans are a bit indifferent towards BA(myself included), but I know a few players in the team and they've all told me that the players absolutely love BA. I guess there's a lot that we don't see behind the scenes, but the players love him.

  • Ah NRL journalism, where everything's made up and the points don't matter.

    On the plus side it's nice that the articles about the Eels are all rumour-mill contract stuff and we haven't had any players involved in anything dodgy (touch wood).

  • Guthos isnt one.....

    Moses either....

    Or Jnr....

    Thats leaves the rest.

  • The money that Penrith were contributing drops off which is why the option is in RCGs favour for '23. There is also an option in Parra's favour if RCG takes up the option for '23. This is why RCG is not taking up the option. RCG is happy at Parra but is likely to get more money if he renegotiates 

  • What a load of crap...............

    I could make something up right now and Bang !!!!!!! @ A rumour is born.    Some people seriously need to find a rewarding life instead of attacking our club and coaches non stop... Its tedious and getting damn boring.

     

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"Why, he never left on bad terms. And was honest about it with Ryles. We let him go to chase the top dollar that eventually never seemed real, so I have no doubt in my mind parra will tell an Australian/NSW blues winger to get lost for setting…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"I don't really think he left then all of a sudden this revelation came to light. Just before Lomax was released RTS said he is staying. Then after word he said to my contact that Haas had signed with R360, Haas said he would stay at Brisbane. Jye…"
5 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"I would take Lomax back as he is better than any other option at the club or on the market.  The risk isn't that Lomax won't be committed or will ruin morale and what Ryles is working on, I think the risk is the circus towards the end of 2027 and…"
5 hours ago
HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"I'm not fussed either way but if doesn't come back we need to sign another experienced outside back, we have zero depth with  proven first grade experience. "
6 hours ago
More…