This is an article similar to what i posted a few months ago. Ryles is doing what many, if no rookie coaches do. He could have had the likes of Lane, Matto, Ofahengaue, Cartwright etc. still playing, let them see out their deals and ease the young kids in and have 2027 as the year where things start to build slowly again. He would have been given 2025 and 2026 as grace period as he builds the juniors into full-time FG.
What did he do? He decided to come in and say "Stuff this" as he decided to get a head start and get us going quicker despite Parramatta being patient as a club. I said the moves he is doing leads to expectation quicker as he is trying to get us competitive perhaps a year or two earlier than anticipated. With that comes the risk that by 2027 if he has not gotten into the 8 the pressure is going to be hotter than what it would be if he kept the experience for the next year or so.
The article is right, if this fails with Parramatta he is at risk at being a one and done NRL head coach. But i think he is what this club has needed for some time. Something different. Let's be fair have we seen a rookie coach do the things Ryles has done to a roster in such a short time? I wonder if Souths would love this right now with them signing older players who are past their prime. Or St. George Illawarra who had Ryles ready to sign on a 5 year deal until he pulled out last minute due to lack of control being offered. Dragons right now could have used Ryles starting last year. Now they have Daniel Anderson coming in doing what Ryles more likely would have done in getting rid of the deadwood.
But to say Ryles would be a legend if he wins a comp, drought or not any coach would be a club legend if they win a comp. Jack Gibson and John Monie are the only two coaches in club history to win one, they are legends and even immortals of the club. BA would have been in 2022 if they finished the job. So yes of course Ryles would be a club legend with a premiership but like Gibson before him would be remembered more than say John Monie due to the drought involved before the premiership.
All i can say is Ryles is going all in, leaving no stone unturned and if it doesn't work out i reckon he leaves with no regrets on what he has done. But so far there are signs, quicker than what i thought there would be.
Replies
You just have to remember one thing: with all those 'superstars' they were playing for the spoon.
Nothing is lost by ridding those players.
What risk? Am I missing something? Sitting on your hands and doing nothing is the greatest risk.
Yes I have liked his approach but we need to be challenging for the 8 next year and recruit and attract at least two name players at 3,6 or 8.
I say give Jason Ryles a up grade contract for another 5 years+ because i can see him leaving us to coach Melbourne when Craig retires
If he let the one or 2 year contracts run out which face it were ridiculous, parra was paying close to top dollar for players that wouldn't make other nrl teams. Then you need to wait 2 years for the rookies to get experience it's a 5 year plan, not to mention I think the real reason ryles went so hard and fast was the new teams
If parra waited 2 years to sign players you then have to compete with bears, png, and rugby 360 which is an impossible situation that would have seen parra sign players because noone else of quality was left and competing with clubs with frankly too much money to compete with.
I think Ryles intends to turn Parra into a powerhouse club. I think he wants success as much as the fans do. I think he wants a GF but also a Dynasty.
And when you listen to his conversations he is strongly behind junior development and giving them a shot.
So he should be thats the clubs strength junior development and it also guarantees you aren't a slave to the market.Sustainability aswell if we continue down the development track and we start getting transference then the words GF and Dynasty can also be added into the equation.
To me what needs to happen from here is the club needs to ensure that we never need another fucking rebuild.
The best run clubs rarely go through one, where they need to knock down the joint, win a spoon so they can restructure the squad. We seem to go through these pains every decade or so and it's simply not good enough.
Put simply, rebuilds are symptomatic of a poorly run club. Yes some players move on, but to have to change over the club every 4/5 years is simply unacceptable.
Spot on and i think ryles with his strong focus on pathways is the man to turn things around. The previous coach, along with head office, totally neglected our pathways and constantly recruited average to below average first graders to fill holes in our roster going for the quick fix.
Edit; even our reserve grade side was filled with washed up recruits rather than with up and coming juniors.
I said this exact thing at the start of the year and got shouted down by a few posters. We were meant to be that well run club prior to Ryles getting here but it's now clear that we were not. MON is meant to be the guy who ensures that sustained success but when Ryles got here all the poor contracts were exposed. Player options, reserve graders on overs etc. I am hoping the club has learnt its lesson but with MON still in the Chair I doubt it. If Ryles leaves we're destined for another total knock-down and rebuild again.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next