Parramatta chief executive Jim Sarantinos has urged fans to keep backing the judgment of Jason Ryles after the Eels coach emerged as the key figure in the decision to sever ties with Zac Lomax.

The Eels confirmed on Sunday that they had agreed to release Lomax from the final three years of his contract, with the NSW and Australian winger expected to switch codes and eventually sign with rebel rugby union competition R360.

There have been whispers he will spend time in Japanese rugby before then. He has, however, likely played his last game in the NRL after the Eels decided they were better served spending their money on a player who was fully committed to the club. Ultimately, club bosses made the call in consultation with Ryles.

“He (Lomax) made it clear he wanted to pursue opportunities elsewhere,” Sarantinos said. “There’s obviously been that connection with R360. I really don’t know where that is at. I have no idea. “But he came forward to us and he asked if we would consider releasing him early. The main stakeholder in this is the coach. He’s been pretty decisive and strong around decisions he has made in regards to personnel.”

“I think the view was that if we have a player whose focus may be elsewhere and the opportunities came to exit that situation sooner rather than later, and it gives you an opportunity to strengthen your roster somewhere else, why not do that.”

“It’s not something we have been planning for the long term. But obviously we’ll look internally, we’ll look at who is available and we will look at the balance of the roster.”

Lomax’s departure is expected to strengthen the Eels’ bid to sign South Sydney and Kangaroos forward Keaon Koloamatangi, who came on the market on November 1. The Rabbitohs are fighting hard to keep Koloamatangi, but whispers are growing louder that he has had his head turned by Parramatta.

When asked whether he was surprised that Lomax had decided to leave, having fought so hard to get out of his deal at St George Illawarra to move to the Eels, Sarantinos said: “I don’t think you sign any player for four years and expect that 12 months into the contract they are going to be looking at other opportunities. Things change. When we signed Zac, Brad (Arthur) was coach. We probably didn’t expect that would be the situation. Now we have Rylesy in place and he’s been pretty clear with all the decisions he has made around personnel.”

It is understood that a transfer fee has been included as one of the conditions of Lomax’s release from his contract. The size of the release fee remains a closely guarded secret - this masthead was told it was a significant figure.

If Lomax is R360 bound, they will need to stump up plenty of cash to secure his signature for their inaugural competition in October next year.

Not that money appears to be an issue. Nor do the 10-year bans that have been threatened by the NRL for players who join the breakaway league.

They certainly don’t appear to have affected Lomax’s decision.

“I have no idea what R360’s strategy is,” Sarantinos said. “Are they looking to tear the NRL apart or are they looking to pick and choose NRL players. I don’t know how much of a deterrent the bans from the NRL will play. For some players it will be a major deterrent. For other players it may not matter.”

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • seems everyone has a theory, maybe Ryles is leaving soon to take over from Bellamey at the storm so decided to reck parra to have 1 less oppersition.

    • You would start with a bigger name than Parra if you wanted to do that.

      Ryles leaving to coach one of the new RC360 sides would have a better chance of happening.

      • True, don't need a plant to come in and ruin Parramatta, they can do that by themselves.

      • That is a very relevant point  you raise here Poppa. Never thought about their need for coach poaching and JR's connection to Eddie Jones makes your point extremely valid. Bloody hell what a mess this could make of our game :(

  • Lomax was on 850 k l- 900k at Parramatta.  Ask yourself is 850 for a winger outrageous money.

    Why do you think flannagan didn't stand in his way

    Brad Arthur thought he could turn him into a representative centre - bs.  That's why brad offered him 850k.  Lomax has always had too many deficiencies to play center.   But ba didn't see it

    Also at the dragons Lomax was on 900k

    If people think Lomax came to parramatta for 650 its a 100% load of shit.

    What player would come to a club for 650k when we had no chance of making the finals and wasn't on 900k  at the dragons  

    You guys have had the wool pulled over your eyes.

     650k lol unbelievable 😆 

    • 650 for the position he was playing was a high salary for wingers back then and was middling for a strike centre.900 where are you getting this BS from chief do you like continuing to pull figures out of your arsehole and throw a guy under the bus who hasn't been here for almost 2 years.

      Your just like the people that run the club when it goes tits up it's someone else's doing.

      Rent free I see it still runs strong.

    • @CHIEFY Mclovin

      Chiefy you must be the most stupid person we have ever had on 1EE. 

      The absolute rubbish you have maintained in regard to a wingers price means you have no idea his value as a player. If he was purely a winger and nothing else I could half understand, but you obviously as demonstrated by being  the "village idiot" have no understanding what he brought/brings to the team.....if Moses left tomorrow I would love to see how you convert it to a BA foilble and him really only worth 900k and we paid too much anyway. Do you think Moses would not want to keep him at 1 million!

      You have got yourself the dishonourable "immortal vote" as the inaugral winner of the site (1EE) Dope of the Year!

      • Poppa the point being Lomax wasn't on 650 at Parramatta, but you're too far gone to understand the point of my post.

        800k to 850 for Lomax is way too much to pay and it would be better used in other more important positions. 

  • He said looking internally first.

    That's a good sign 🙄🙄🙄🙄

  • You can tell it's the off-season, this blog certainly woke up our resident conspiracy theorists.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Nightmare Off-Season replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Clinton Schifcofske
"Bluey, Pops, Coryn & Mutt, great posts on this blog."
1 minute ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Clinton Schifcofske
"Every 5/8th or halfback requires possession to do any damage. It was lost on a lot of fans in 2024 when the Eels were lucky to win 45% of the ball due to the insane amount of errors.
Every half relies on a pack for field position, and relies on…"
7 minutes ago
EA replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"I feel we could have 2M for next year if you include Mattos salary. "
7 minutes ago
Numbers replied to LB's discussion North Queensland Cowboys Winger Murray Taulagi set to exit Cowboys, could he be an option for Parramatta?
"Garrick would not sign with us for that amount unless we offered him 4 or 5 years which I hope we don't. He rejected Manly's 2 year $1m extension so would be after more $$$ or years for security.  "
7 minutes ago
More…