Replies

    • They are also keen on Josiah Pahulu too. Cannot fit them all in. If they get Pahulu, they might ease on Thompson. Wests have May, Dragons might go for Thompson. Raiders are a clear fav at this point, unless Pahulu stays at GC then Dogs are. Or we could be used as a pawn to get more money out of wherever he is going, meaning we weren't interested at all.

      • We still have Matt Lodge waiting in the wings LB. Wiz is offering him a carton of soft drink empties as a third party deal.

      • Gus has fed him Chinese. Its all over.

  • Could Fletcher Baker head our way? Might be squeezed from broncos. If this Thompson deal doesnt come off

    • Baker has good size but he is a depth signing to me. Could still be developed too. We need starters however.

    • I think Baker would be a worthwhile 1 or 2 year deal on cheap coin. I agree that he is unwanted and likely to be squeezed out in Brisbane

  • Some news this morning saying Leo Thompson is going to Dogs

    big coin for the front rower 

    what would you expect ? $650+ a season

    • Gould is also been quoted as saying he won't pay overs for any players, Leo may not end up at the dogs 

      In other news 

      That is according to Code Sports, who are reporting the 23-year-old has put pen to paper on a three-year deal from 2026 worth around $500,000 per-season.

  • Joe O is another Matterson a imposter trying to pretend to play first grade rugby league. Both should be reported to NRl integrity unit for stealing money!!! 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"looks like it. This fight just got bigger. What say V'landys? Is he gonna investigate or just make a statement (joking, same thing). "
58 seconds ago
parra supporter replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I heard this morning that the nrl were going to sign off a contract with Melbourne despite parras contract clause. This move makes a lot of sense if that was the case.  I think this has been well handled by Parra."
3 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"if he loses yes he probably would be liable for costs"
4 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Nice. But the NRL should be backing us. We have called V'landys bluff now as this drags on, lets bring him to heel by making his impotence and abandonment a talking point. I am proud of us for kicking this off in their faces"
4 minutes ago
More…