Dylan Brown Staying or Going vote

GOING interests  -  *

* loves NZ and has talked about his passion for his country test wise. 

* was very close to Brad Arthur, virtually a father figure to Dylan.  Would turn up to the bush coach's house unexpectedly for morning biscuits and Milo just for a chat.

* also rumoured to be close to the Arthur family Sons and Daughters ect

 

STAYING NARRATIVE- 

* Dylan's contract is one of the most lucrative in the NRL. probably in the top 3. The length of contract ( 7 more years), with future clauses along with the rumoured 900k will be extremely tempting for him to stay.

* Has had knee and back injuries previous meaning the length of contract here may be very difficult to match by other prospective clubs.

 

For mine, I'm on the fence, but if push came to shove, I'm leaning towards leaving very slightly.  I just think with Shaun Johnson leaving the Warriors, they will throw the kitchen sink at Dylan, maybe up to a million a season.

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If he stays it will not be the options. It will be a revised 3 year deal or so.

    I think he stays.

    • Revised? Surely you don't think Parramatta are upping his dollars?

      • Well it depends on what he is on now. I would believe that the salary goes up from each option. Media mention it is $900k salary, if it was i reckon he takes it particularly with a partial ACL tear.

        Let's say for argument sakes he is on $700k for his next option for 3 years. We could just say sign til 2028 worth $850 a year. Brown gets more money annually but also has the same flexibility he had with the options by getting out after the 3 years with expansion. 

  • I think Warriors will throw a $1mil+ at him, which will be be dumb for us to match. While I do love Dylan and want him to stay, he's not a Million dollar player and we'd be putting significant pressure on our roster.

    If Dylan gets a huge offer from the Warriors he'll take it. Then we should go hard after Galvin. The problem then is we'll be in a 3-way battle with Tigers and Roosters and I'm not sure we'll win that... unless the young lad truly bleeds Blue & Gold. 

  • Can Parra just say we're not offering you a contract past 2025? From what I'm reading there's not a lot of interest for his services (Dolphins, aside) and he'd soon come scampering back for his $900K. Parra certainly don't want to get into any bidding war. 

    • No.

      • He can renege on the contract but we can't? Doesn't seem right. Maybe we could sack him for being an embarrasing sex pest. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"Okay, if the priority is focusing on our juniors (Lorenzo) and giving them the time and space to develop then having Pezet as a stop gap then i'm on board. Obviously it feels weird and a bit of a gamble to bring in a good player for just 1 year then…"
52 seconds ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"How does it get worse as it ages ? 
I think what a lot of fans are confusing is 2026 isn't meant to be the same as 2025 for us . It's not about getting the kids in and familiarising them with systems and seeing how we want to move forward in 2027…"
9 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Ryles confirms Pezet play
"Well you knew Volkman was never it Parra is his 4th or 5th club.
Hawkins was let go by South's so again he's a JaG player who fills a gap not an answer.
Joash probably not our guy but if anything JR has signalled his future with the Pezet move.…"
10 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"Maybe Ryles is mates with Braith."
15 minutes ago
More…