Ducks and Drakes

I think it is interesting looking at the ladder in this final round. Bit like a game of poker, do we show our hand, call the other team’s bluff, or even let a game go?  I mean seriously GC 36- New 6?  Alternatively, relying on Cronulla to beat Canberra would seem nuts, another twist, Roosters go down to Souths, we win, they remain in 4th and play Penrith, we face Storm. Interested in others thoughts around this unusual final round and whether certain teams are possibly throwing games. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • I think we can beat storm at Suncorp. We have a big following up here and I would certainly be going. Also we love a dry track and that's what it would more than likely be up here

  • A well choreagraphed victory !

     

  • I've thought for a long time that the Storm are the team to beat and all the others are fighting for the chance to play them in the GF

    How many mistakes does Keary have in him when his forwards aren't dominating

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Hahaha deadset set up if I've ever seen one

      They want to play them in the GF not week 1 and potentially get busted up.

  • Foxing it or not (definitely foxing it) 60-8 is dead set embarrassing. To make the joke worse rabbits were robbed of two tries could of been in the 70's

  • Sack TR

  • If the Roosters were a horse you'd swab them. WTF is that sh1t?

    • It's so unbelievable you'd be tempted to bring in the cops to investigate any suspicious bets.

  • If we beat the Tigers tomorrow next week would be the fifth time we play the Storm in our last 6 finals. How f#*#*# is that

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"I noticed in a video of 1st grade players wishing younger teams good luck that Talagi and Flether were signed out by many players by name in the video message.
Does that mean they have spent more time with the NRL side to build these relationships…"
10 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"You will get "you heard it hear first" credit Blue....Cannibal Zac"
10 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Hoe , another great summary and viewpoint, Love it.
Does anyone else think that V'Landys has shown his hand with Walters coaching the NRL owned inaugural Papa New Guinea Chiefs with Zachary Lomax as their first Marquee signing. mmmm cynical much."
19 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Poupou, now you just divert to other unsubstantiated claims, rather than address the counter-example of the  lawyer example I provided and which you claimed was invalid. 
This is shoddy argument on your part by being unable to warrant the specific…"
21 minutes ago
More…