Ducks and Drakes

I think it is interesting looking at the ladder in this final round. Bit like a game of poker, do we show our hand, call the other team’s bluff, or even let a game go?  I mean seriously GC 36- New 6?  Alternatively, relying on Cronulla to beat Canberra would seem nuts, another twist, Roosters go down to Souths, we win, they remain in 4th and play Penrith, we face Storm. Interested in others thoughts around this unusual final round and whether certain teams are possibly throwing games. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • I think we can beat storm at Suncorp. We have a big following up here and I would certainly be going. Also we love a dry track and that's what it would more than likely be up here

  • A well choreagraphed victory !

     

  • I've thought for a long time that the Storm are the team to beat and all the others are fighting for the chance to play them in the GF

    How many mistakes does Keary have in him when his forwards aren't dominating

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Hahaha deadset set up if I've ever seen one

      They want to play them in the GF not week 1 and potentially get busted up.

  • Foxing it or not (definitely foxing it) 60-8 is dead set embarrassing. To make the joke worse rabbits were robbed of two tries could of been in the 70's

  • Sack TR

  • If the Roosters were a horse you'd swab them. WTF is that sh1t?

    • It's so unbelievable you'd be tempted to bring in the cops to investigate any suspicious bets.

  • If we beat the Tigers tomorrow next week would be the fifth time we play the Storm in our last 6 finals. How f#*#*# is that

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"In fairness, I've been guilty of poor conduct in the past. I'm now making a point of not doing that anymore."
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"HOE, it's possible for attacks on ideas to be attacks on people. It can be a fine line. But we can test the line. The test is to ask if the premise of an attack relates to some aspect of the identity of a person making a claim, or to the…"
3 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Couldn't agree more Daz. 
Not wanting to make it sound political, but, this is what the "right wing" / "real Australians" / "non-politically correct" / "anti-woke" crowd carry on with. They shit can everyone they don't agree with and when they get…"
3 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"On the topic of moderation, there's something I think needs to be absolutely spelled out.
In a perfect world, we wouldn't need moderation because we would all be responsbile enough to engage in robust debat, sometimes quite vigorous debate, possibly…"
4 hours ago
More…