Ducks and Drakes

I think it is interesting looking at the ladder in this final round. Bit like a game of poker, do we show our hand, call the other team’s bluff, or even let a game go?  I mean seriously GC 36- New 6?  Alternatively, relying on Cronulla to beat Canberra would seem nuts, another twist, Roosters go down to Souths, we win, they remain in 4th and play Penrith, we face Storm. Interested in others thoughts around this unusual final round and whether certain teams are possibly throwing games. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • I think we can beat storm at Suncorp. We have a big following up here and I would certainly be going. Also we love a dry track and that's what it would more than likely be up here

  • A well choreagraphed victory !

     

  • I've thought for a long time that the Storm are the team to beat and all the others are fighting for the chance to play them in the GF

    How many mistakes does Keary have in him when his forwards aren't dominating

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Hahaha deadset set up if I've ever seen one

      They want to play them in the GF not week 1 and potentially get busted up.

  • Foxing it or not (definitely foxing it) 60-8 is dead set embarrassing. To make the joke worse rabbits were robbed of two tries could of been in the 70's

  • Sack TR

  • If the Roosters were a horse you'd swab them. WTF is that sh1t?

    • It's so unbelievable you'd be tempted to bring in the cops to investigate any suspicious bets.

  • If we beat the Tigers tomorrow next week would be the fifth time we play the Storm in our last 6 finals. How f#*#*# is that

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"V'Landys initially made two claims about NRL players leaving for R360. First was a very general threat: he said if they negotiate with R360 they get a 10 year ban. The second was a specific, legally-vetted threat: if they sign they get a 10 year…"
6 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar commented on charlie cauchi’s status
"It doesn't mean contracts don't mean anything, it just means the conditional release doesn't mean anything. It means we shouldn't have offered the conditional release. Instead it meant our options were to either say "No, you're staying" or "Yes, you…"
16 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"So someone has finally managed to get V'Landys to comment and wow, so underwhelming. "
45 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"A lot of water to go under the bridge for making assumptions on who how and what.
All I know is first things first we need to get this Lomax mess soughted and found in our favour and if we don't alot of these Melbourne strained relationship stuff…"
48 minutes ago
More…