You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I agree good point , hence why i said for various reasons."
"Nah, I agree with your individual assessment of him. 250-275 would cover him.
It's just you had, as a guide, an initial 50 gamer was at $400K ish."
It's just you had, as a guide, an initial 50 gamer was at $400K ish."
"I didn't think Sharks actually paid the money. Just that he left for the money at Knights, it failed miserably and then he wanted to come back for more money.
"
"
"Maybe he's calling R360 hoe. 😝😝😝😝"
Replies
After 17 games he want's morey
More Coin and much morey Glory
I find the whole vibe to be whorey
Don't get hit on the arse by the Doorey
Completely fair enough. He's entitled to see what's out there.
I'd like to keep him as he runs hard and has good speed. But if he leaves we'll be hunky-Doorey...
Well played
Must have read HOE's blog and want his 50 game $400K contract.
Badger, I had him on unders at 250K due to minutes (av. 26 min pg or so). Might need to pull my head in and up that now. How much do you think?
Maybe he's calling R360 hoe. 😝😝😝😝
Nah, I agree with your individual assessment of him. 250-275 would cover him.
It's just you had, as a guide, an initial 50 gamer was at $400K ish.
If we are to sign another forward, one or two need to go. Not for salary cap issues but just because we have the numbers. And that's if most of our young forwards like Funa-Iuta start in Jersey Flegg.
Letting go of Doorey, Mataele, Pryke etc....is probably on the cards so we can get a big name forward AND keep the youngsters revving.
But Doorey is good and if he leaves that team is getting a good player.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next