I’ve always said ‘No one deserves nothing unless it’s been earn’t’, and if Parra was flying and winning games I’d say sorry Tim, BUT we aren’t and there are a few players I’d happily replace for Tim. 

I think he’s earnt the right to play his final game in 1st at home in front of his home crowd. I think he deserves it!!

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yes he does but not on the field, few quite beers at wenty rsl

    • Tim’s playing better than most in first grade, I wonder what’s happened (I’m sure I know) to have the club captain embarrassed like this from BA. No respect shown from BA.

      • Totally disagree, its not a charity Baz, its about winning.

        And hes not playing better than anybody, hes a complete myth.

         

        • So he’s not playing better than Alvaro? Completely disagree snake.

          Played great today 80mins scored a try and saved a try, what has Alvaro done lately?

        • Wrong again Snake.

  • Yeah not like we gonna win anyway, he is a decent bloke so give him the respect of a farewell.

  • No, he was happy to walk away from the club when told he was dropped instead of taking it like a man and fighting his way back, very poor form, very entitled..

    Hes on the nose at the club and rightly so, wont be getting a send off and doesnt deserve one.

     

    • I agree he’s on the nose, the question is why? It’s got nothing to do with being dropped, cause it wasn’t the first time he was rested or dropped.

      • Is he on the nose cause of others being "on the nose"??

    • At least you’ve been consistent Snake, can’t knock you for that. Called it years ago

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
6 minutes ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
9 minutes ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yep, but fuck I hope not. The Nrl should be on parras side here"
10 minutes ago
The Badger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Our side says it's black & white. His side says it's more grey."
21 minutes ago
More…