In the first 18 minutes of the 1st half. 

1. Raiders forward shoulder charge in a tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

2. Raiders voluntary tackle = no penalty to Rabbits

3. Rabbits back forces an involuntary line drop out, ball and arm hits the ground behind the try line = Raiders knock the ball out and are awarded a try. 

WTF

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Na, let them play

  • Raiders forwards are doing nothing. Souths are matching them easily. 

    • Rabbits are getting on top but both sides look tired. Wonder if the week off will favour the rabbits during the 2nd half, probably 60 minute mark onwards? 

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Sorry Choccy, fantastic game, let the players sort it out, just let them play.

    And anybody who thinks the game should outlaw stripping, I present that last 40 minutes, every possession was a contest, nothing was a given. It was brilliant.

     

    • Agreed about the ball stripping and the 2nd half entertainment. It was a very good game. Still think a foul is a foul and the refs were not doing there job in the 1st half. Souths bombed a few try opportunities in the 1st half and could have been up 14 to 18 nil - raiders try was not a try. 

  • The Roosters and Melbourne were light years ahead of other sides this year. I know Raiders beat Melbourne but everything went there way including a dropped ball in the last minute to win. It was similar to 2017 eels performance except they won.  They won’t beat them again. Parra were not far off Raiders or Souths but were never going to beat Melbourne or Roosters in a finals game. 

    • 100%.

      Watching this game, I can’t help but think what might’ve been. We definitely have more weapons in our arsenal than both these sides put together, it’s just a shame the raiders beat the Storm first week.

       

      • Storm wanted Raiders to beat them. The Storm are better without a week off.

  • South's are doing well playing without a halfback,  Reynolds is ghosting his teammates 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"Bup, pragmatic and wise. I hope a few of those "surprises" go our way. Pezet was good value by all reports, so we might have some powder dry. Thanks mate."
58 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"NOS, your mind & heart is a treasure. You've been missed, brother.
You're using one of my favorite mantras. Frank Ponisini: "We can disagree, but we remain committed to the cause."
Not sure how things will go next year as there are lots of…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"We don't have a choice do we.
Me with this Pezet signing I dislike the idea that Brisbane will get the long term benefits with the player while we are still rolling the dice trying to find Moses foil.
Before you know it we'll be looking for the…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"Longfin, Pops, Super — good posts, thank you, gents.
Super — the "bridging player" idea is an excellent description. It slipped my mind, but I will probably add that in later giving you credit."
1 hour ago
More…