David Fifita

Curious as to others thoughts.. with David Fafita free to negotiate with other clubs from November 1st, what bearing may yesterdays result have on his intent to stay with the Broncos?

Parramatta are building something special for years to come, the money on offer is very very competitive.....

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I saw Fifita at the end of the games shaking hands and ended with Ma’u and had a longer word and admiring look and respect. Hopefully after that games he sees us and wants to be apart of it. Broncos need to buy playmakers and won’t have the money idc who they get rid of I think they’ll still be too tight. Milford might leave, Macca might, Bird might, Boyd might, but getting rid of them will cost money. I only see us having the money to buy him and he’s too perfect of an option to replace ma’u. I think we could get him for 850-900k if we offer 5 years. 

    • I’m sorry pork and beans I don’t like it. 900 k for 5 years, he’s a good foward but not worth that lol

      • It’s either him or Matterson for 500+. Lane and him are probably too similar. 

        • i also say Matterson , he is the best replacement for Mau

          I think most clubs (other than the roosters) struggle with their cap with Million $ players

          Hardworking, skillful players at half the price are what we need

  • $500,000 Max  for 3 years

    We dont play every Friday night , have a few daytime  games each year plus Darwin.

    Broncos forwards cant handle sun or temperatures over 16 degrees.

    Yesterday proved that

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Couldn’t agree more good Dr.

      • They’ll let Oates go and play Arthurs on that wing from the Titans I think. 

  • He's not worth $1M at the moment but by the end of five years he'll probably be worth more than that.

    • That does not mean there will be a Club out there prepared to offer this money!

      • There's always desperate clubs out there pinching stars off the big clubs by paying massive overs.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels posted a discussion
 

More Than a Contract
Everyone understands the Zac Lomax situation isn’t really just about a contractual dispute. A registered agreement. Legal technicalities. R360 gone pear-shaped. Timelines. Even Storm agendas. That version is neat.…
11 minutes ago
Alfred Mateo replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"Can't argue with that. Hopgood might be in the mix for origin selection but no real mongrels/tough hombres in our current pack.
Interesting to see how Newcastle goes this year. On paper, their backline is probably ranked in the top 5 but some doubt…"
18 minutes ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Doing things in 'good faith' doesn't stand up in this cut throat business. It's like the good old handshake deal when your word and a handshake meant something. You respected each other.  Unfortunately, respect and honour means shit in the court of…"
19 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"There's plenty to like about the eels I think we'll be relying on a system more so than physicality and athleticism.
I see our inexperience in the pack as a strength they play with no fear and sure mistakes come with it.TDS Tuivaiti Kautoga and…"
23 minutes ago
More…