You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"At this stage, not just yet. We're just trying to get comfortable with it first. We may look at YouTube for our interviews."
"Bingo. When you look at our juniors, our middles seem the strongest. You've got Sam Tuivaiti, Luca Moretti and Charlie Guymer all with NRL experience. Then you have Jordan Teancum Brown who looks like he'll debut later this year at this rate, then…"
"will never get a better chance of beating the storm, weakest forward pack in years and lost a lot of quality players exiting the club and their best forward in Katoa. Eels by 16."
"See when your in the race for talent are we really in the race.
JR interviewed and talked with all these guys and we got Pezet for a year.
This is one of the issues that has to change going foward we can't continue to put up note interest and just…"
JR interviewed and talked with all these guys and we got Pezet for a year.
This is one of the issues that has to change going foward we can't continue to put up note interest and just…"
Replies
He generally has the same open and realistic opinions of the general rugby league community, and has very little agenda.
I would have to agree. He is very different from say, Brad Fittler who seems to waffle on without entertaining anyone, and seems to be a little...tactless and thickheaded
Though it will not be a popular choice, I like Phil Gould. I find Gould to be a thoughtful analyst not afraid to speak against the tide. He calls it as he sees it and he has a good footy brain.
On the anecdote side, I had a nice email exchange with Gould years ago. It must have been 8 or even 10 years ago. I was living overseas in Canada, and the only NRL I could get was a few highlight videos and one game per week on some global sports channel. I read this article on the Sydney morning herald online edition, by Gould, which amounted to a rant against those he did not like, with a lot of mystery references, unname so and so's, half made pregnant innuendos, etc. It was awful journalism, more suitable to a diary entry. So I wrote him an email (back when direct email for online journo pieces was more common!). I basically said I respected his footy analysis and that there were many footy fans like me who liked reading intelligent commentary on the game, and that muck raking wasted our time, not to mention some fans living overseas had little real news, so it really wasted our time. Gould wrote back directly and said he regretted the piece and took seriously his role as an analyst, and conveyed a series of his own anecdotes to say he knew his standards should be higher.
I found Gould to be a good fellow in those emails, and thus never go for the criticism he unjustly cops on 1eyed. That's my story anyway.
Gould calls it as he sees it LMAO. Thanks Daz I needed that laugh.
Unlike other league personalities, I've always been impressed with him authoring his own pieces. Whilst I often disagree with his ideas, I respect his intellect.
On radio, every scrum penalty was "feet across the scrum". Those were the days.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next