By Steve Jancetic
February 17, 2010

With chequebooks at the ready, NRL rivals Parramatta and Canterbury Bankstown have welcomed revelations from gun playmaker Daniel Mortimer that he wants his long-term playing future decided before the start of the 2010 season.

Eels chief executive Paul Osborne and Bulldogs counterpart Todd Greenberg said they were both ready to sit down for talks with the 20-year-old - who comes off contract with the Eels at the end of the year - at any time. 

After initially indicating he would wait until midway through the season to make a decision on his future beyond 2010, Mortimer said he now wanted a deal done before kick-off in a bid to ward off the possibility of second-year blues. 

And according to Mortimer there are only two clubs in the hunt - Parramatta and the Bulldogs - the club at which the Mortimer name was made famous thanks to the deeds of his father Peter and uncles Chris and Steve. 

"I agree that finalising a decision is probably a good thing for all parties," Greenberg said. 

"I think it's important for him and for us that these things don't drag on." 

Asked whether the club was in a position to table an offer, Greenberg said: "We haven't done that yet but we will look to do that in the coming couple of weeks." 

While the appeal of turning out for the Bulldogs is obvious, Osborne said Parramatta were confident of retaining a player they had nurtured into the top grade. 

Osborne said there had been ongoing talks with Mortimer's manager Steve Gillis, but denied the club would rush the youngster into making a decision. 

"I just want him to concentrate on footy - we're not worried whether it's before round one or not before round one," Osborne said. 

"We're just waiting to hear back from them - we're ready to talk to them now. 

"We're pretty confident he'll stay. Obviously he likes the place." 

Gillis refused to confirm the round one deadline, but intimated his star client was ready to step up talks. 

"I think there's a possibility things could move forward sooner rather than later," Gillis said. 

"We've spoken to Parramatta - we've discussed in a roundabout way where we're at but there's nothing concrete. Nothing's going to happen overnight."..

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I can't wait till he sign with someone, so I can stop reading this shit !!
  • im sick of the fucken dogs
  • I with you Eels47 ......I sick of all the carry on when a player contract is up !!
  • How does this make Kimmorley feel ???

    If Daniel signs it is arguanbly the end of his career. If he elects to stay how will he feel towards the Dogs knowing their attempts to recruit another halfback ?
  • I think the loyalty card is one that cannot be used by supporters anymore! We use it when it suits and then suggest it is unimportant when it doesn't suit.

    While we as fans demand loyalty from young kids and the players of our team, we are very quick to put the knife in and be ready to be rid of players when they begin to reach the end of their careers! How many threads have we had on whether players like Luke Burt or Nathan Cayless should be given the boot? These are players who have shown our club ultimate loyalty and we as fans do not do the same to them.

    The bottom line is - is that money talks. If the Bulldogs wish to lure Morts away with coin, then so be it. Morts is yet to play a full season of NRL and is entering what is usually a tumultuous second year. Parramatta should not play overs for him, when we have other options in our halves.
  • Oh and one more quick point - while others are criticising Daniel for mucking us about, I think what he is doing is that fair and mature approach to how negotiations should be conducted.

    He has given us a deadline in the not too distant future. At least once his decision is made we can focus on the rest of our season, knowing exactly the position of all our halves.
  • Mary "mature approach to how negotiations should be conducted" cannot agree with this, IMO it show how immature he is. Couple of months ago he said he will not take any decision untill mid season then he changed his mind (I think its something to do with KK's form in trial). If you wanna see mature approach look at Hindy or Caylo, have you ever heard of their negotian, NOPE.

    Nothing aganist Morts, he is a champion player, he is kind of player who might bring you Premiership. We all know deep down he is a Bulldog. Oneday he will go to Bulldogs for sure. Many of us mentioned before KK could be similar as him if not better. If you look at 2008 NYC, you will know how good KK was. I will be filthy if we loose KK for Morts. Hopefully we will keep both.
    • Perhaps mature was the incorrect word. The point I was simply trying to make is that whether the reason is to concentrate on footy or becaus the Bulldogs are demanding an answer, I appreciate that we will have an answer by Round 1. I see it only as win win because There will be no ongoing negotiation through the season, the matter will not drag on and we can also remodel our team, depending on the way Mortssigns.

      The bottom line is, is that for young stars like Morts, it's almost inevitable that te media will hook onto any talk about contract, especially considering the rivalry between the Eels and Dogs! These things are rarely kept private anymore. Think about Jarryd, Mateo, Inu, Tahu etc.
  • How does this make Ben Barba. If Barba can fix his defence, he could be anything.
  • I guess that depends on your definition of mature. He's made this announcement not to 'concentrate on footy' and 'avoid 2nd year syndrome' as has been reported; rather, the fact that the Bulldogs will have to make a decision on either Kimmorley or Mortimer sooner rather than later.

    Mortimer knows this and so has thrown his hat into the ring knowing that the Dogs want him. It's now a case of 'may the fattest chequebook win'. Clever? Yes! Mature? I'm not so sure. In my opinion - he's done the mercenary thing a bit here.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion If Galvin ends up at the Dogs, what then?
"Piss off Volkman he no good and have Smith on the bench he could play hooker 5/8 or half"
3 minutes ago
Parraborn1 replied to Parra_Greg's discussion WE STILL TOO CRAP FOR VEGAS
"I honestly think the Eels as a club just aren't putting their hand up to go. Vegas can be an unwanted distraction for a club that's rebuilding. They will go in 2027."
5 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion If Galvin ends up at the Dogs, what then?
"Would have been better off just keeping DB I mean though the rumours are out there the dogs are biting I have to think Galvin is still in play for Parra surely."
38 minutes ago
Sparky 74 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion If Galvin ends up at the Dogs, what then?
"GET LUAI 
simple where there is smoke there is fire 
he too wants out of tiger town
 
the Tigers are best to merge with the bulldogs 1 say so Gus can get the players he wants & punt the rest"
46 minutes ago
More…