Brandon Smith avoids suspension

The NRL simply refuse to sanction any Melbourne Storm player. Brandon Smith joins Felise Kaufusi & Nelson Afosa-Solomona on the protected species list of Storm players who have remarkably avoided suspension.
Melbourne have a few injuries & the Nrl need them firing during the finals.
This is getting truely embarrassing.

10751329096?profile=RESIZE_710x

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Did anyone really expect a different result?

    • Well I am naive BEM.......not even referred!   Their immunity remains mind-boggling!

  • That was not a hip drop. Smith did not deserve any suspension or fine.

  • I agree, it was on the lighter end, but if they want to get it out of the game they need to sanction every example. I reckon he could've been given a couple of weeks to send a message but since it's the Scumbags, nope 

  • Smith did lose control of the tackle. Him being dragged along the ground and then swinging himself into Tino isn't a defence. This is like trying to argue that you should be able to hit a bloke in the head if he steps you and you hang an arm out.

    On the scale of hipdrops, this wasn't the worst so I can understand no suspension.

    • It's not even close to a hip drop. 

    • What is he supposed to do Super, let go ?

  • I hate the Storm more than peak hour traffic but this tackle wasn't that bad. It didn't look intentional. It looked like he got swung around. 

  • Hate the Storm, love a good conspiracy story, however anyone calling for the Cheese to be sanctioned for that tackle is dreaming. Nothing in it. We have too much microscopic paralysis by analysis in the NRL, no wonder the refs don't have the cojones to make a decision and have the bunker make all the hard decisions. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Daz, appreciate the response mate and you expressing your position.
I still would like to understand why NOS claims you made "very personal attacks" on Muttman.
You both definitely vigorously debated/argued (as above).
No doubt, there is a fine…"
26 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, I received a message from HOE, noting you had made this accusation I see above. HOE was clearly suggesting I should address it and if I had made a "very personal attack" upon Muttman (as accused) then I would be held to account. 
I replied that…"
41 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, before we get onto all the questions and claims you've raised in relation to "moderation" please let's start with your claims of Daz's "very personal attacks" on Muttman. 
You may be completly correct, but please provide evidence supporting…"
47 minutes ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, Muttman and I have been members of this forum for the better part of 20 years. 
I completely respect him and often compliment his considered judgment. 
On one occasion, out of frustration, I reacted to his regime of agendered negative…"
51 minutes ago
More…