Brandon Smith avoids suspension

The NRL simply refuse to sanction any Melbourne Storm player. Brandon Smith joins Felise Kaufusi & Nelson Afosa-Solomona on the protected species list of Storm players who have remarkably avoided suspension.
Melbourne have a few injuries & the Nrl need them firing during the finals.
This is getting truely embarrassing.

10751329096?profile=RESIZE_710x

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Did anyone really expect a different result?

    • Well I am naive BEM.......not even referred!   Their immunity remains mind-boggling!

  • That was not a hip drop. Smith did not deserve any suspension or fine.

  • I agree, it was on the lighter end, but if they want to get it out of the game they need to sanction every example. I reckon he could've been given a couple of weeks to send a message but since it's the Scumbags, nope 

  • Smith did lose control of the tackle. Him being dragged along the ground and then swinging himself into Tino isn't a defence. This is like trying to argue that you should be able to hit a bloke in the head if he steps you and you hang an arm out.

    On the scale of hipdrops, this wasn't the worst so I can understand no suspension.

    • It's not even close to a hip drop. 

    • What is he supposed to do Super, let go ?

  • I hate the Storm more than peak hour traffic but this tackle wasn't that bad. It didn't look intentional. It looked like he got swung around. 

  • Hate the Storm, love a good conspiracy story, however anyone calling for the Cheese to be sanctioned for that tackle is dreaming. Nothing in it. We have too much microscopic paralysis by analysis in the NRL, no wonder the refs don't have the cojones to make a decision and have the bunker make all the hard decisions. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mark replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"don't know last text was his banned with no explanation as to why or how long other than what's been discussed. You'd think you'd be happy to say why so the crowds aware of what's acceptable. If you're happy to devuldge the reasoning behind Brett's…"
6 minutes ago
Mark replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"So enforce non footy blogs into social blogs. It's a rule everyone's happy to follow and just delete them if they don't.  I'm sure the group can all live with that other than the gooses who just need to get rid of them to feel they got a win for…"
12 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
""Arbeit macht frei""
13 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I lurked here for quite a while before i started posting. Some blogs are stand alone reading material (eg you, Daz) but most need the comments to be worthwhile. Folks opening the blogs are reading the comments. If replies to blogs were removed the…"
21 minutes ago
More…