Historically when a coach is sacked the players respond positively for a week to two or three, then fall back to their average performance that brought about the dismissal of the coach. It is no secret that the four players off contract from West-Tigers this year have had some input about the coaching staff position for next year. If it turns out that that performances do not improve in the next two or three weeks those played action re the coach will be under attention in the negative sense. What club would want to pay $800 K a year for non-performing player who question the suitability of his own coach? I suggest that those four platers ought to consider the offers available today and not wait two or three weeks when their reputation may be much lower that they are today.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Makes our coaching merry go round good.
Just bugger off Monto, seriously you add nothing to this site.
I thought it might have been monto but im pretty sure its not, its benj.
They had a good win round 1, everyone singing praises about their style of play and two poor losses.
Now they want to install a coach that was playing there just a short time ago, crazy business.
Just don't think Farah would've been the type to jump out from the ship gracefully, somehow. You?
Robert the issue really is that this is the 3rd coach in a short period of time (Sheen and Potter too) and Wests are still to improve. So obviously the players arent under any pressure, they can just keep blaming the next coach.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next