Eels Blogs

captain coach

Posted by fat albert on November 8, 2018 at 11:34am

I dont know enough about the salary cap or the workings of it and was wondering if anyone knows enough on here to tell me if this is possible or not.As an example ill use Hayne name.Is there anything in the rules stopping Parra naming Hayne as a captian coach and making BA as head coach of Parra .Hayne as a captian coach salary than be split from playing cap and coaching cap.Say 400k as a player and 250k as a coach.Im not saying for Hayne to be Parras coach it could be for example signing C.Smith for 2 seasons as a captain coach and splitting his contrat between coaching and playing

Views: 38

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★
★
★
★
★
Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –
Follow

Replies

  • Brett Allen November 8, 2018 at 11:37am

    It's an interesting idea, I don't have a definitive answer, the NRL under Greenberg is less transparent when it comes to the details of the cap than it was under Dave Smith, but I seriously doubt they'd go for it. 

    It would be pretty obvious that we were trying to circumvent the cap. 

    In fact, I'm sure there would be a provision in the CBA preventing this sort of thing.

  • Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 November 8, 2018 at 11:54am
    If there was a possibility of doing this, every club would be doing it
  • robert maxwell November 8, 2018 at 12:24pm

    great ideas cam smith as captain/coach

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"LB, Eli, good discussion gents. We've acted in good-faith. By the book. With clean hands. Lomax appears not to have. But regardless of that, equity is not unlikely to view a 3-year restraint until 31 Oct 28' as overly-punitive and read it down.
We'd…"
18 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The best thing for the Eels is if we say nothing our position is clear we only have to come back to the table if Melbourne come with something we see as advantageous for us that really is the bottom line.
Best thing about this there the ones doing…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I know i have said it before but Storm fans say we are being unreasonable and see no outcome in which we win this case. Despite all the released, that is still the belief. I believe in bias and backing your team but come on.
But i do not think they…"
7 hours ago
More…

Eels blogs

Social Blogs