Toxic low testosterone

Apparently men with low testosterone get COVD worse.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/additionalmeetings/93534?xid=nl_covidupdate_2021-07-13&eun=g1839635d0r&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DailyUpdate_071321&utm_term=NL_Gen_Int_Daily_News_Update_active

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Better not buy Woods then, for the COVID risk alone.

  • Then that begs the question "should the bulldogs be allowed inside the Queensland bubble"?

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Wile, that is not what the study actually reports. We have to be careful swapping from an association claim (Men with X also have Y) to a causal claim (Men with X get Y). 
    The report noted the study authors explicitly saying it's an association not a causal finding. They don't know if pre-existing low testosterone leads to worse outcomes if the male gets Covid-19, or getting Covid-19 really badly also reduces testosterone. I'm sure the full report also probably controlled for the obvious confounding factor: age. Older you are, the worse Covid hits. 

    • Daz, I was sent this recent study on Ivermectin. Posting here because someone closed the previous blog for some reason.

      https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/i...

      It seems legit but I'm not sure. What do you think?

      Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics
      mortality, in secondary outcomes, and in chemoprophylaxis, among people with, or at high risk of, COVID-19 infection. Data sources: We searched…
      • I wondered why super closed that blog down, I assume it was him. Maybe he thinks he is You Tube and needs to protect us from alternative views?

        • Most likely because of UFC 264, i.e. the Wiz and Daz extravaganza.

          McGregor breaking his leg off was nothing compared to that show.

      • Monsier Eel, this Bryant et al study is relatively new and I found it listed in the data sampling we run,  but I haven't had a chance yet to go over it (busy with some other tasks). 

        I whipped through and a few remarks just off the top of my head.

        1) the authors state no conflict of interest but that is not true. Bryant heads the UK-based BIRD group which is an ivermectin advocacy group, the UK equivalent to the US FLCCC. You could try to say advocacy is distinct to money, but I would ask why hide the link?

        2) study reports 62% reduction in hospitalization risk and 80% reduction in death risk. This is an outsized conclusion given their own data. At best they could say ivermectin might have benefit and is worth a full trial. Why exaggerate the effect?

        3) the most technical so bear with me! Look at Fig 7, the funnel plot. Their own diagram contradicts how they render it. The funnel plot measures publication bias (tendency to publish positive not negative findings). If no pub bias, the results should cluster around 1.0. Bryant et al claim they do but their plot shows the opposite. Small and low quality studies cluster lower than 1.0, meaning reduced risk of death if taking ivermectin, but larger and higher quality studies cluster around 1.0 ( o effect). Note the authors identified lower and higher quality studies so I am using their assessment. Their own funnel plot clearly shows publication bias. Statistically, I bet it you removed the small and low quality studies, the beneficial effect Bryant et al report would disappear. I say "I bet" but seriously it's obvious from their own data, as the studies they rank higher cluster to reporting no effect. 

        4) thus, the big issue with meta analysis comes home to roost here. Just because you pool a whole lot of small and low quality studies, you don't magically produce a large high quality study. They have not produced a big randomized and controlled clinical trial just by pooling data from small low quality trials. But they pretend they have by ignoring their own funnel plot. 

        5) PS: I just plugged "Kory" and "Bryant" into the search field for our algorithmic data scraper and limited results to past 2 months and I see Kory has tweeted that this Bryant et al study is a "slam dunk" proving ivermectin is efficacious. No no no. A meta analysis even if it is the greatest meta analysis ever is just a pointer to the need for a large, high quality, randomized clinical trial. The meta analysis itself flags associations. If you want evidence of conflict of interest, it's Pierre Kory completely misrepresenting what the study does. 

        I could say more but to do so would involve following the trail of the 24 studies they use. In a meta analysis, your statistical regressions are only as good as your inputs. Garbage in, garbage out. Health food in, health outcome out!  But as I noted, their own funnel plot shows their conclusion relies entirely on the small and low quality studies that they themselves identified as showing signs of publication bias. How did that pub bias ramify through to their conclusion, you should ask. It's garbage in garbage out! They should have performed regression on the two sides of the funnel plot (lower than 1.0 and cluster around 1.0) but they chose to retain the low quality studies. Why? Because it dilutes the "no effect" of the higher quality studies and drives the conclusion toward a positive result. It's publication bias pure and simple. I would not trust any conclusion based on this meta analysis. 

        • https://c19ivermectin.com/

          isummary.png

          Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 101 studies
          Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 101 studies
This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Darren Munro replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Furthermore people on here wanted to pay sandon Smith 800k to a million. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣"
9 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"LG doesn't seemed to be liked by the dogs.players. Gus has already putchased a half from Rooters.  Following along the Gus recruitment policy of throwing as much shit at a wall and hoping some will stick. Changes his mind more than a woman. The dogs…"
29 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Ethan Strange and Ezra mam are the best young 6s in the comp. Elite running game and eyes up footy. Galvin is a ways behind them but he's still solid "
1 hour ago
Who Cares replied to Bob mertens's discussion Shane Flanagan given a month to turn the dragons around.
"why is this on the eels site, who cares about Shane ( Grumpy ) Flanagan"
1 hour ago
Graham polkinghorne replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Little hiccup for the Dogs. They all still want to win a GF. CC will figure how and when to inject LG into the team. They will be even stronger in 2026."
2 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Sexton and Mahoney have been good for them...Be interesting to see how Galvin and Haywood go next year.  If they falter this year in their run ....it may filter into 2026 and with they way they have binned players off will be added…"
2 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
""Keep true to the dreams of your youth" nice one PT"
2 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"lol true...maybe if he becomes 18th Man in Origin he will "
2 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"He'll be gone by the end of 2026, they'll realise hes not that guy. Hopefully we can try and snag katoa, put moses 6 and katoa 7. 
 "
3 hours ago
GM replied to Bob mertens's discussion Shane Flanagan given a month to turn the dragons around.
"🤣 dumbass "
4 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Na mate.
For $750k, they definitely expected him to be in their team, at least the top 17.
No way they bought him to put away like some mega rich business man does with his expensive watches. He's there to play in their halves. Even if that means…"
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eels2025's discussion Jason Ryles... Report so far
"I love a laugh Mickey and I appreciate Wiz's humour, just dont get the context.
PS .....Mickey you didn't see that coming?
Nostradamos your not Mickey and is it true your real name is "Glasscock".
 "
4 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion Who ever is Parramatta lady defence coach is please help our NRL side please
"Yeah they stagger me how they keep turning up in defence.
They're a fit side and play as a team. Also a joy to watch."
4 hours ago
Sulkowicz replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"So did IM use MM as part of the plan. Heard MM tried to convince LG to come to the Eels."
5 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Canterbury hooker Reed Mahoney to join Cowboys on long-term deal
"His 20-22 seasons he was lights out for us.Ive seen him play alot better with a decent foward pack around him."
5 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Even if all that is true it is a good outcome that we didn't overextend ourselves. It's just as important to opt out on signing players who aren't a good fit for us. "
5 hours ago
More…

NSW Origin Squad 2025

WESTPAC NSW BLUES SQUADAmpol State of Origin, Game OneSuncorp Stadium, Brisbane Wednesday 28 May1. Dylan Edwards (Penrith Panthers)2. Brian To’o (Penrith Panthers)3. Stephen Crichton (Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs)4. Latrell Mitchell (South Sydney…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 261

 

Jake Averillo & Josh Kerr

As the title suggests, Jake Averillo & Josh Kerr are both rumoured to be free to negotiate with rivals clubs. I believe both players would fit well within Ryles' plan.Jake Averillo:There was some mail earlier this week that Ryles had met with Jake…

Read more…
86 Replies · Reply by Aracom 15 hours ago
Views: 3124

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>