The one COVID-19 number to watch

ABC NEWS

Story Lab

Updated 10 Apr 2020, 14:14pm
Published 10 Apr 2020, 3:03 am
 

he vast array of data on the coronavirus pandemic can feel overwhelming, as we all try to make sense of how fast COVID-19 is spreading around the world and the relentless daily count of new cases and deaths.

Helpfully, there’s one number that can tell us quickly and clearly whether the coronavirus outbreak is getting better or worse. It’s called the growth factor.

The main thing to understand is this — to be sure we’re staying on top of the outbreak, we must keep this number below one.

And here is how the growth factor for Australia’s outbreak currently looks.

Australia's current
growth factor is0.84
Mar 6
Apr 9
HIGHEST
1.39 Mar 12th
LOWEST
0.83 Apr 6th

What is ‘growth factor’ and why is it important?

Put simply, the growth factor measures how fast the number of new cases is going up or down.

And here’s the key point:

  • If the growth factor is above one, the number of new cases each day is going up. If it stays above one consistently, alarm bells should be ringing.
  • If it’s below one, we’re getting the outbreak under control.

Calculating the daily growth factor is as simple as taking today’s new reported cases and dividing it by yesterday’s new cases. Because these numbers can be a little volatile, we’re using a five-day moving average of new cases for our calculations.

Of course, the growth factor will change over time. Even though Australia’s current growth factor is below one — meaning there were fewer new cases today than there were yesterday — that could change.

But for now at least, things are headed in the right direction.

Australia looks to be successfully flattening the curve but as public health officials keep reminding us, the fight against coronavirus is likely to be a long one.

Even if the number of people sick with COVID-19 gets quite low, the virus could start spreading quickly again without ongoing vigilance.

[Want to see how Australia’s growth factor compares to the US, the UK and other countries around the world? Keep reading, or skip ahead.]

What else should I know?

A figure like this is only ever as good as the data being collected. So when reading the growth factor, there are two extra parameters to keep in mind: community transmission and testing.

The number of coronavirus cases originating overseas is starting to decrease drastically at the moment, and there’s a risk those falling numbers could hide something more worrying — a smaller but rising number of cases caused by spread by community transmission.

Experts say the rate of that local spread may be a better indicator of just how well our physical distancing measures are working.

It’s been difficult to compile data on community transmission. So far, the data we do have only starts in April.

It shows little difference in the growth factors for imported cases and local spread. However, there are about 89 cases still ‘under investigation’, meaning their origin remains unclear.

Australia (community transmission)

current daily
growth factor:0.81
Apr 1
Apr 9
HIGHEST
1.03 Apr 4th
LOWEST
0.49 Apr 1st

Australia (imported cases)

current daily
growth factor:0.82
Apr 1
Apr 9
HIGHEST
0.96 Apr 3rd
LOWEST
0.37 Apr 1st

Another question mark around the data is testing. We will only find cases where we look for them and much of Australia’s testing has been focused on people arriving from overseas and their close contacts.

Even though Australia has tested a high proportion of the population by international standards, Catherine Bennett, the chair of epidemiology at Deakin University, says our high testing rate and low positive rate are a “red herring”.

“If you’re not testing the increasing number of people with symptoms in the community, then you only see what you test for.

“If we can look at that in more detail as we do the breakdown [of community transmission] within Australia I think that’s going to be helpful, because I do think it ties to the lockdown. The lockdown is all about community acquisition, not about the boats that came in four weeks ago.”

The unknown number of undetected cases currently in the community may prove crucial to keeping Australia’s outbreak manageable.

Several states have announced they’re now expanding testing criteria to include a broader cross-section of the community. So it’s important to remember that any rise in the growth factor could be, in part, a result of more widespread testing.

“As we expand our testing we expect it to go up but that doesn’t necessarily mean community cases are going up, it means that testing is broadening to capture them,” Professor Bennett said.

Finally, it’s worth remembering that even though the growth factor is a great litmus test for how well we’re keeping Australia’s outbreak in check, other numbers are important too.

How are other countries doing?

Now that we understand what growth factor means, it can also provide a useful insight into outbreaks around the world — and how different countries are faring in their efforts to bring coronavirus under control.

The following charts focus on the countries with the largest overall coronavirus outbreaks around the world, as well as some of Australia’s nearest neighbours.

 

As you compare those global figures, it’s even more important to factor testing regimes into your thinking. If one country is testing a lot and another is testing very little, it’s going to have a major impact on how their growth factors stack up.

See charts at this website https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-10/coronavirus-data-australia-growth-factor-covid-19/12132478

 

About the data

  • Australian case numbers are sourced from federal, state and territory health department media releases and press conferences and compiled by ABC News. For countries other than Australia, the number of cases comes from data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.
  • Health authorities update their figures at different times of day, so the numbers shown do not reflect the same point in time in each jurisdiction.
  • Growth factors have been calculated using a five-day moving average of new cases.
  • Where there are fewer than five cases per day on average over the past five days, no growth factor is calculated. This is represented by a grey dotted line on the charts.
  • It’s important to note that all data in this story represents confirmed cases, which includes presumptive positive cases actually identified by authorities. The actual number of cases in each country is likely to be higher, as an unknown proportion of people with the virus would not have been tested. Therefore, the numbers’ accuracy will also vary depending on how much testing each country is doing.

Credits

  • Reporter & Developer: Simon Elvery
  • Designer: Ben Spraggon
  • Additional Reporting: Matt Martino
  • Editor: Matt Liddy

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Vince articles from the ABC are banned on the site . 

    • lol, I put them for my very special friend Poppa. He loves them

       

       

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

SuperEel 22’s discussion was featured
Next week is our last Supporters Group Alliance meeting for the year, so if you have questions for the likes of Jim and Mark, get them in.
As a reminder, the SGA is focused on the club's interaction with community, members and supporters on match…
10 minutes ago
rex macmundi replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"It's a yay from me "
23 minutes ago
GM replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Would be a good signing, definitely not coming as a depth option "
30 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"When I go buy a house, 90% of the time I want that house the real estate agent is just for show. If we had the money we'd get anyone we want."
56 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Me too. I'm guessing Moses and some Juniors are on way more than we think."
57 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Eelawarra's discussion THE EELS SUPERTEE
"Fantastic idea, and great effort from so many including our club. Kudos."
59 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Eelawarra's discussion THE EELS SUPERTEE
"This is most excellent!"
1 hour ago
Trent replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"The club need to  stick  and not let him sign with another nrl club  regardless of compensation. Or it will show how easy it is to get out of a contract under ryles"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Love the optimism. Took the Panthers 10 years to cultivate their Babies to the juggernaut they have become. Not sure we can do that in 12 months.
Gus started in 2011, fixing their pathways and Juniors.
 "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Not many in the backs at the moment."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"If it is depth, it is a great signing. If he starts on the Wing ok let's see how it goes."
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"I think Analayst it's safer to say, our recruitment team cannot close a deal on a talented in demand player. "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Well HOE did a nice blog a few months back talking about it and it makes sense."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"At first i was like the hell, but sitting on it i do not mind it as much. Good competition for Simonsson, experience in lower grades and he can cover Centre where we are very thin. If Penisini or Russell went down you have Simonsson but who plays…"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"What is your take on it Wild Eels.
Do you think Ryles is identifying talented 1st choice targets in the first place.
Who do you think is missing the "close the deal" aspect of recruitment. 
I have to say that if the Eels as a club don't sign Ryles…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"I reckon there is a good chance he could play Wing. I wouldn't change Russell and JAC combo. The way they kept Staggs out of the game in Brisbane was incredible. I would keep that partnership and use Kelly as that work horse Winger."
1 hour ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>