The one COVID-19 number to watch

ABC NEWS

Story Lab

Updated 10 Apr 2020, 14:14pm
Published 10 Apr 2020, 3:03 am
 

he vast array of data on the coronavirus pandemic can feel overwhelming, as we all try to make sense of how fast COVID-19 is spreading around the world and the relentless daily count of new cases and deaths.

Helpfully, there’s one number that can tell us quickly and clearly whether the coronavirus outbreak is getting better or worse. It’s called the growth factor.

The main thing to understand is this — to be sure we’re staying on top of the outbreak, we must keep this number below one.

And here is how the growth factor for Australia’s outbreak currently looks.

Australia's current
growth factor is0.84
Mar 6
Apr 9
HIGHEST
1.39 Mar 12th
LOWEST
0.83 Apr 6th

What is ‘growth factor’ and why is it important?

Put simply, the growth factor measures how fast the number of new cases is going up or down.

And here’s the key point:

  • If the growth factor is above one, the number of new cases each day is going up. If it stays above one consistently, alarm bells should be ringing.
  • If it’s below one, we’re getting the outbreak under control.

Calculating the daily growth factor is as simple as taking today’s new reported cases and dividing it by yesterday’s new cases. Because these numbers can be a little volatile, we’re using a five-day moving average of new cases for our calculations.

Of course, the growth factor will change over time. Even though Australia’s current growth factor is below one — meaning there were fewer new cases today than there were yesterday — that could change.

But for now at least, things are headed in the right direction.

Australia looks to be successfully flattening the curve but as public health officials keep reminding us, the fight against coronavirus is likely to be a long one.

Even if the number of people sick with COVID-19 gets quite low, the virus could start spreading quickly again without ongoing vigilance.

[Want to see how Australia’s growth factor compares to the US, the UK and other countries around the world? Keep reading, or skip ahead.]

What else should I know?

A figure like this is only ever as good as the data being collected. So when reading the growth factor, there are two extra parameters to keep in mind: community transmission and testing.

The number of coronavirus cases originating overseas is starting to decrease drastically at the moment, and there’s a risk those falling numbers could hide something more worrying — a smaller but rising number of cases caused by spread by community transmission.

Experts say the rate of that local spread may be a better indicator of just how well our physical distancing measures are working.

It’s been difficult to compile data on community transmission. So far, the data we do have only starts in April.

It shows little difference in the growth factors for imported cases and local spread. However, there are about 89 cases still ‘under investigation’, meaning their origin remains unclear.

Australia (community transmission)

current daily
growth factor:0.81
Apr 1
Apr 9
HIGHEST
1.03 Apr 4th
LOWEST
0.49 Apr 1st

Australia (imported cases)

current daily
growth factor:0.82
Apr 1
Apr 9
HIGHEST
0.96 Apr 3rd
LOWEST
0.37 Apr 1st

Another question mark around the data is testing. We will only find cases where we look for them and much of Australia’s testing has been focused on people arriving from overseas and their close contacts.

Even though Australia has tested a high proportion of the population by international standards, Catherine Bennett, the chair of epidemiology at Deakin University, says our high testing rate and low positive rate are a “red herring”.

“If you’re not testing the increasing number of people with symptoms in the community, then you only see what you test for.

“If we can look at that in more detail as we do the breakdown [of community transmission] within Australia I think that’s going to be helpful, because I do think it ties to the lockdown. The lockdown is all about community acquisition, not about the boats that came in four weeks ago.”

The unknown number of undetected cases currently in the community may prove crucial to keeping Australia’s outbreak manageable.

Several states have announced they’re now expanding testing criteria to include a broader cross-section of the community. So it’s important to remember that any rise in the growth factor could be, in part, a result of more widespread testing.

“As we expand our testing we expect it to go up but that doesn’t necessarily mean community cases are going up, it means that testing is broadening to capture them,” Professor Bennett said.

Finally, it’s worth remembering that even though the growth factor is a great litmus test for how well we’re keeping Australia’s outbreak in check, other numbers are important too.

How are other countries doing?

Now that we understand what growth factor means, it can also provide a useful insight into outbreaks around the world — and how different countries are faring in their efforts to bring coronavirus under control.

The following charts focus on the countries with the largest overall coronavirus outbreaks around the world, as well as some of Australia’s nearest neighbours.

 

As you compare those global figures, it’s even more important to factor testing regimes into your thinking. If one country is testing a lot and another is testing very little, it’s going to have a major impact on how their growth factors stack up.

See charts at this website https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-10/coronavirus-data-australia-growth-factor-covid-19/12132478

 

About the data

  • Australian case numbers are sourced from federal, state and territory health department media releases and press conferences and compiled by ABC News. For countries other than Australia, the number of cases comes from data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.
  • Health authorities update their figures at different times of day, so the numbers shown do not reflect the same point in time in each jurisdiction.
  • Growth factors have been calculated using a five-day moving average of new cases.
  • Where there are fewer than five cases per day on average over the past five days, no growth factor is calculated. This is represented by a grey dotted line on the charts.
  • It’s important to note that all data in this story represents confirmed cases, which includes presumptive positive cases actually identified by authorities. The actual number of cases in each country is likely to be higher, as an unknown proportion of people with the virus would not have been tested. Therefore, the numbers’ accuracy will also vary depending on how much testing each country is doing.

Credits

  • Reporter & Developer: Simon Elvery
  • Designer: Ben Spraggon
  • Additional Reporting: Matt Martino
  • Editor: Matt Liddy

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Vince articles from the ABC are banned on the site . 

    • lol, I put them for my very special friend Poppa. He loves them

       

       

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"If Pezet isn't putting in fully in our jersey, Ryles doesn't seem the kind of character that wouldn't fear being honest or even sideline. I don't think he'd do what BA used to do. Keep someone who isn't performing up to scratch."
3 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"I guess playing for the badge doesn't count in this case.In Riffs case they get the benefit of doubt right they have a system they aren't in a rebuild phase and the fact they win consistently with whomever they have.Point of difference but we'll…"
23 minutes ago
LB replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"1 year deal then he returns to the North Pole reindeers on a 3 year deal, just got a years experience here to fine tune his skills on loan."
40 minutes ago
HKF replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Santa to sign 4 year deal as eels prop."
56 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Because there's a huge Christmas announcement happening.  That's the scoop .  "
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Agreed Adam, and I suspect that is our intent."
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Hawkins was good for our club, despite staying only for a year, no? Pezet is at worst, a decent short-term depth replacement. You need depth. Panthers halves depth options are also a perennial revolving door.  We don't say they're stupid for…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Yeah it is hard, as us fans including myself want signings. Though, at the same time you do not just sign for the sake of it either."
2 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Managers and players might be holding off to see what happens with R360 they have a contract for 2026 anyway "
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Have anyone of those halves been on a one year deal where there bailing.I don't know of any club that's done the player a favour and paid them the mentioned also.
Theres very little upside in this deal for Parra as we either rinse wash repeat in the…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"If that's the state of the market we should be consolidating our position, not going to market."
3 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"If Pezet plays 20+ games for us he will definitely provide $600k worth of value. It's 2025. Every club in the NRL will have one or both starting halves on $600k+."
4 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Because there aren't enough off contract players to meet the demand. This is creating a bidding war. So the clubs might be in a hurry to sign players but the players certainly won't be in a hurry to sign when there's so much money available. It's a…"
4 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"This is where I'm hoping the clubs at in this area if we are like Pou is mentioned around 600 it's not good value for us that's another decent player in your top 30 that's development ready."
6 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Good luck with that if potential is worth a mill these days go the Broncos but as for us a 20 game not much isn't worth 600.
Potential unrealised even if he has a good year here if teams are valuing that there the teams that are fucked.The good…"
6 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"He's not getting paid for what he's done, he'll be geting paid for what he's expected to do during the course of the contract. If he underperforms those expectations then he'll be on overs, but I expect Pezet to become one of the top halves in the…"
7 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>