Thought i'd make a thread on such an important world event, this is the type of thing people should be able to discuss and probably need to discuss.

First off id like to pay my respects to the 13 hero Ukraine soldiers on the Ukraine island, Snake island.

These brave soldiers told a Russian warship to 'go fuck yourself' when ordered to drop arms and hand the island over, knowing full well it would mean their deaths.

10151787465?profile=original

10151784063?profile=RESIZE_710x

10151783891?profile=original

 

All the power to the people of the Ukraine, the families and soldiers.

Blessings to the soldiers and familiess on both sides who are just doing what they are ordered to do.

10151789673?profile=original

10151788301?profile=original

How big is this conflict going to get?

Whats your thoughts on it?

You got any dogs in the fight?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Finland Boarder in 1939.... over 100000 Russian Troops ready to invade.....On the Finland side one Finnish trooper says to his mate, we are such a little country........where are we going to bury them all!

    True quote Quora Encyclopedia

  • Go the Blue and Yellow

    With no real help they do not stand much of a chance. Russia tested the water and confirmed no one would help. They will keep going and take it all.

     

  • For all the harsh rhetoric, so-called united-West, the aid, and sanctions - Ukraine is left to fight alone.

    The NATO pretext was always a redirection for anti-US, anti-West sentiment. He would be laughing at NATO & the UN: toothless tigers. Russia is even the head of the UN security council. That's almost criminal. 

    Bottom line, Putin admits he has never accepted Ukraine's sovereignty: it's part of Russia for him, and was unjustly taken away. So, now he's launching missiles and killing Ukrainians to "denazify" it. Before it was the West's fault & NATO. In 2000, Putin said: 

    “Russia is a part of European culture. Therefore, it is with difficulty that I imagine NATO as an enemy (2000)."

    We tend to overlook the fact Ukraine was a NATO partner from circa 1991 after its independence. So, why did Putin wait so long for the NATO hopeful before invading Ukraine in late March 2014 and annexing Crimea? 

    It was practically on the day Ukraine signed the EU deal in March 2014 moving them closer to the EU - in lieu of Putin's 15b deal thrown aside. All of which happened right after the Ukrainian Euromaiden protests from late 2013 to force Ukraine to sign the EU deal. This would have incensed Putin considering Ukraine ousted the former Ukraine pro_Russian PM at the time (who had already knocked back the EU deal and accepted Putin's).

    10152019476?profile=RESIZE_930x

     

    10152019484?profile=RESIZE_930x

    10152021864?profile=RESIZE_930x

    So, Putin was facing a belligerent Ukraine, independent, moving towards EU, towards NATO, and away from Russia. It also helps Ukraine has strategic and economic benefit for Russia - as a "shield" to the EU with an abundance resources such as oil, agriculture, iron ore, coal and so on. Plus, Crimea has a Russian military base facing the Black Sea.

    Putin says Ukraine is "One People" with Russia. Does this remind you in any way of Hitler's "One Blood" or Xi's "One Country"? All three are similar: with claims on the land of other soverignties, as rightfully theirs, to destabilize allies (unsuccessfully) and to return their nation to its glory years. And all three are willing to unleash sociopathic hell on anyone who stands in their way. NATO, US, EU, UK, anyone. Interfere, and Putin says he will use nukes. And a nuclear winter could be the end of many of us.

    What's irks Ukraine even today some 30 years later is that during 1991-1994 it gave up its arms, missiles and nukes (Lisbon agreement) - and sacrificed its security and defence - in exchange for Russia's promise to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and security (Budapest Memorandum). 

    Back in May, 1995 in the Krelim, Yeltsin even said: “Russia will give every state that wants to join NATO a guarantee that we won't infringe on its security”. Clinton: "They trust you, Boris. But they are not so sure what's going to happen in Russia if you're not around." Prophetic words from a controversial figure, blamed by some academics such as Chomsky for restarting the Cold War.

     

    10152033665?profile=RESIZE_930x

     

    10152034263?profile=RESIZE_930x

    Perhaps, NATO needs to be disbanded with the First Cold War and Warsaw Pact over and to quell a fearful, paranoid Russia that someone like Putin can use for his political purposes. Perhaps, a new Euro alliance is needed to ensure its purpose is formally recognized, but one that still presents an undivided and united Euro region where everyone respects each other's borders and sovereignty - and one that still invokes article 5 -  one for all and all for one. Because Putin has proved the world still needs it. And maybe after Putin is gone, Russia could join.

    But first Putin needs to go - by whatever means necessary.

    • NATO has been a defence pact in search of a purpose since the wall came down. It failed both Ukraine & Belarus by giving into Yeltsin's demands after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it failed horribly, no criminally, during the Balkan wars, and it's indifference to the endless civil wars in it's former African colonies is just disgraceful. 

      Is it any wonder Donald Trump wanted the US to stop underwriting this useless organization ? 

      The reality is that Western Europe is only really interested in its own interests, especially France & Germany, and they ride roughshod over any other sovereign nation within the EU that tries to stand up to them.

       

      • Brett Allen  couldn't have said it better Brett. NATO are a pathetic waste of $$$ and always have been.

        I recall Rwanda civil war and the hundreds of thousands slaughtered / butchered and no one gave a toss. 

        Trump was always spot on about stopping to underwrite these thieves.

      • Brett, the West has failed Ukraine. Ukraine is an independent sovereignty & a NATO partner from 1991 - that Russia promised they would not threaten in 1994. Ukraine signed a EU deal to move closer to the EU in 2014. They are a UNSC member. Our security structures have failed to protect them.

        And although this may seem paranoid Zelenskiy hasn't tweeted for 10 hours. Very uncharacteristic of him. He's usually updating everyone regularly every hour or so. It's got me concerned. 

        What a hero he is. Probably shows great leaders don't need to be experienced, career politicians.

         

    • Yeah, I guess NATO is looking at its own interests in no entering  Ukraine.  Russia has told them that for NATO to enter Ukraine will bring atomic warfare. So ,who wants to get nuked?

  • Remember, this is Putin and his lackies. This is not the Russian people.

    They just don't assassinate Presidents the way they used to.  Why can't the CIA do what it has done before & save many lives, just un-alive this bloke. 

     

    • Don't underestimate the Russian people, particularly the old Bolsheviks MB. They, like the Chinese, like Mother Russia to be seen as a superpower and to be respected accordingly. 

      • Spot on Brett, the western medias making out theres no support, but theres plenty.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"TolElls, Set up a new Averillo blog if you want to discuss it. I'm not going to reopen a blog closed by moderation. Hopefully, people keep it relatively civil (as much as possible) or drift horribly off topic into personal attacks and it will stay…"
44 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Well if those above JRcant get the players he needs, what choice does he have, he needs to have 30 players. "
50 minutes ago
Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Wtf, which blog was this in?"
55 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Hey HOE,
I have a question.
So, Daz & a few others attacked Muttman with very personal attacks a few weeks back, he has since left the site which is a massive loss.
For some reason, those attacks from Daz, Bourban Man and others seemed to slip…"
2 hours ago
TolEllts replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Admins, Why can't we reply to Averillo blog? What bad will it do the forum of the Eels executives and R&R team if Eels fans are venting their frustrations about the recruitment which unfortunately are contributing to the bad results in the field.…"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
""
2 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"At the same time he still has a percentage to meet in terms of how much the cap needs to be spent whether he likes it or not.
So if it is like "This player wants $400k and we have $900k available" well he has to spend that money anyway.
So the issue…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"They are fine players, though are they just better in better teams? Do they themselves make you better?"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Surely if MON does not go, which no idea whether he will or wont, Rogers goes."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Well true. I mean i mentioned all the Lomax stuff based on a contact and they were spot on with pretty much most of what was told. So cannot 100% discount this but still it was a friend of Jack's that said it."
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"That's easy you'd take Bostock purely from an athletic perspective he offers more and his body type is prototypical for outside backs that go well in the game at the moment."
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Wasn't their rumours about the players disliking Jim because his inept ability to sign anyone. I guess the more things you see and hear the more and brighter things become clear. Poor MON, maybe the guy tries to sign some stars but our ceo is tight…"
4 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion One proud fan
"Nobody has agreed with Poppa since he bent the knee for his lovely wifey Marcia… now he only laughs when she gives tge nod"
4 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Mallee57's discussion Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs
"Dogs team aren't happy and it seems Crichton is part of the problem."
4 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Chiefy,
Of course, mate. Totally understandable. Criticism, passion and disagreement are welcome.
It’s the below-the-belt, cheap-shot stuff that attracts moderation attention.
Likewise, ranting about moderation being unethical or in bad faith is not…"
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion One proud fan
"Agreeing with Chiefy is fraught wth danger, he han't got anything right since Mrs Arthur put him on the "kiddies table" with the other Arthur boys. Unfortunately it was a sleep over and Chiefy wet the bed. He has had a problem with "wet dreams" ever…"
4 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 240

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>