Thought i'd make a thread on such an important world event, this is the type of thing people should be able to discuss and probably need to discuss.

First off id like to pay my respects to the 13 hero Ukraine soldiers on the Ukraine island, Snake island.

These brave soldiers told a Russian warship to 'go fuck yourself' when ordered to drop arms and hand the island over, knowing full well it would mean their deaths.

10151787465?profile=original

10151784063?profile=RESIZE_710x

10151783891?profile=original

 

All the power to the people of the Ukraine, the families and soldiers.

Blessings to the soldiers and familiess on both sides who are just doing what they are ordered to do.

10151789673?profile=original

10151788301?profile=original

How big is this conflict going to get?

Whats your thoughts on it?

You got any dogs in the fight?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Finland Boarder in 1939.... over 100000 Russian Troops ready to invade.....On the Finland side one Finnish trooper says to his mate, we are such a little country........where are we going to bury them all!

    True quote Quora Encyclopedia

  • Go the Blue and Yellow

    With no real help they do not stand much of a chance. Russia tested the water and confirmed no one would help. They will keep going and take it all.

     

  • For all the harsh rhetoric, so-called united-West, the aid, and sanctions - Ukraine is left to fight alone.

    The NATO pretext was always a redirection for anti-US, anti-West sentiment. He would be laughing at NATO & the UN: toothless tigers. Russia is even the head of the UN security council. That's almost criminal. 

    Bottom line, Putin admits he has never accepted Ukraine's sovereignty: it's part of Russia for him, and was unjustly taken away. So, now he's launching missiles and killing Ukrainians to "denazify" it. Before it was the West's fault & NATO. In 2000, Putin said: 

    “Russia is a part of European culture. Therefore, it is with difficulty that I imagine NATO as an enemy (2000)."

    We tend to overlook the fact Ukraine was a NATO partner from circa 1991 after its independence. So, why did Putin wait so long for the NATO hopeful before invading Ukraine in late March 2014 and annexing Crimea? 

    It was practically on the day Ukraine signed the EU deal in March 2014 moving them closer to the EU - in lieu of Putin's 15b deal thrown aside. All of which happened right after the Ukrainian Euromaiden protests from late 2013 to force Ukraine to sign the EU deal. This would have incensed Putin considering Ukraine ousted the former Ukraine pro_Russian PM at the time (who had already knocked back the EU deal and accepted Putin's).

    10152019476?profile=RESIZE_930x

     

    10152019484?profile=RESIZE_930x

    10152021864?profile=RESIZE_930x

    So, Putin was facing a belligerent Ukraine, independent, moving towards EU, towards NATO, and away from Russia. It also helps Ukraine has strategic and economic benefit for Russia - as a "shield" to the EU with an abundance resources such as oil, agriculture, iron ore, coal and so on. Plus, Crimea has a Russian military base facing the Black Sea.

    Putin says Ukraine is "One People" with Russia. Does this remind you in any way of Hitler's "One Blood" or Xi's "One Country"? All three are similar: with claims on the land of other soverignties, as rightfully theirs, to destabilize allies (unsuccessfully) and to return their nation to its glory years. And all three are willing to unleash sociopathic hell on anyone who stands in their way. NATO, US, EU, UK, anyone. Interfere, and Putin says he will use nukes. And a nuclear winter could be the end of many of us.

    What's irks Ukraine even today some 30 years later is that during 1991-1994 it gave up its arms, missiles and nukes (Lisbon agreement) - and sacrificed its security and defence - in exchange for Russia's promise to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and security (Budapest Memorandum). 

    Back in May, 1995 in the Krelim, Yeltsin even said: “Russia will give every state that wants to join NATO a guarantee that we won't infringe on its security”. Clinton: "They trust you, Boris. But they are not so sure what's going to happen in Russia if you're not around." Prophetic words from a controversial figure, blamed by some academics such as Chomsky for restarting the Cold War.

     

    10152033665?profile=RESIZE_930x

     

    10152034263?profile=RESIZE_930x

    Perhaps, NATO needs to be disbanded with the First Cold War and Warsaw Pact over and to quell a fearful, paranoid Russia that someone like Putin can use for his political purposes. Perhaps, a new Euro alliance is needed to ensure its purpose is formally recognized, but one that still presents an undivided and united Euro region where everyone respects each other's borders and sovereignty - and one that still invokes article 5 -  one for all and all for one. Because Putin has proved the world still needs it. And maybe after Putin is gone, Russia could join.

    But first Putin needs to go - by whatever means necessary.

    • NATO has been a defence pact in search of a purpose since the wall came down. It failed both Ukraine & Belarus by giving into Yeltsin's demands after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it failed horribly, no criminally, during the Balkan wars, and it's indifference to the endless civil wars in it's former African colonies is just disgraceful. 

      Is it any wonder Donald Trump wanted the US to stop underwriting this useless organization ? 

      The reality is that Western Europe is only really interested in its own interests, especially France & Germany, and they ride roughshod over any other sovereign nation within the EU that tries to stand up to them.

       

      • Brett Allen  couldn't have said it better Brett. NATO are a pathetic waste of $$$ and always have been.

        I recall Rwanda civil war and the hundreds of thousands slaughtered / butchered and no one gave a toss. 

        Trump was always spot on about stopping to underwrite these thieves.

      • Brett, the West has failed Ukraine. Ukraine is an independent sovereignty & a NATO partner from 1991 - that Russia promised they would not threaten in 1994. Ukraine signed a EU deal to move closer to the EU in 2014. They are a UNSC member. Our security structures have failed to protect them.

        And although this may seem paranoid Zelenskiy hasn't tweeted for 10 hours. Very uncharacteristic of him. He's usually updating everyone regularly every hour or so. It's got me concerned. 

        What a hero he is. Probably shows great leaders don't need to be experienced, career politicians.

         

    • Yeah, I guess NATO is looking at its own interests in no entering  Ukraine.  Russia has told them that for NATO to enter Ukraine will bring atomic warfare. So ,who wants to get nuked?

  • Remember, this is Putin and his lackies. This is not the Russian people.

    They just don't assassinate Presidents the way they used to.  Why can't the CIA do what it has done before & save many lives, just un-alive this bloke. 

     

    • Don't underestimate the Russian people, particularly the old Bolsheviks MB. They, like the Chinese, like Mother Russia to be seen as a superpower and to be respected accordingly. 

      • Spot on Brett, the western medias making out theres no support, but theres plenty.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"A 40 yr break between drinks tends to have that effect no and that's not on fans that's on the club.
Now wheather they want to look good infront of the masses and still lose well that's another issue.Much like the style of play and coaching of the…"
54 seconds ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I agree it's unlikely Risati will make it, no different from any junior with high potential. Most of them just won't make it. But if you're concerned that he plays rugby union, the reason is that he is contracted to the Eels, who have paid for him…"
1 minute ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Burton is worth huge money, and is certainly already on huge money, which is the only reason the Dogs would let him go. With his kicking game, he would be wasted (and overpaid) at centre."
15 minutes ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Nice congrats to him and your family. Those teams are getting stronger every year"
20 minutes ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Let's not throw stones now Chief."
27 minutes ago
Mac5733 replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"There's no point talking about it. Our board can't make a signing. "
32 minutes ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"But yet BA was expected to that and you abused him over it? Right ok. So if Ryles is not responsible for the roster why was BA hated by you for so long? Ryles doesn't get a say at all and MON just buys players and Ryles doesn't say yes or no…"
35 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Remember Rodney Hogg
"Yep, he always gave 110% every time he bowled. That's the attitude we need our Parra players to have."
43 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Dylan should have never ever got into the situation where he could negotiate.  Thats a complete failure on behalf of O'neill 
O'neill 8 years has to be most accountable for the situation we are now in. These are the facts
Ryles cant be expected to…"
46 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"My apologies 'Storm' not Raiders I was thinking about Thursday night game by mistake. "
49 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Happy days Chiefy every blog you manage to turn it into a sack Mon and the other bloke . Mate chill down abit your giving me a Headache. This blog is supposed to be about getting Matt Burton . To which me personally i don't think will ever Happen .…"
52 minutes ago
JC replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"EA, my nephew just got selected in the nswccc team."
57 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Take this discussion on sackings to another blog. There are plenty Chief and that FB petition agenda guy with 66 signatures have already posted. Why poison every blog with this repetitive spiel."
59 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Fair call, EA. Wise.
Based on that zerotackle article from LB, you're right: Lorenzo will be 20 soonish. It's just his physicality at NRL level I wonder about, and the grind. It'd be a lot happier if Su'a was his Tony Carroll. 
Lincoln Fletcher is…"
1 hour ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I wouldn't want to debut Lorenzo if Moses is not at 7. So assuming Moses doesn't back up against Knights, I would wait another week minimum. Personally I see JR using Papalii at 6 for the next few weeks minimum "
1 hour ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I have spoken about it a bit. He has had new combinations to deal with in attack and defence every week which means he has good and bad moments. So it can be hard to pinpoint if he isn't ready or if it's just the lack of cohesion due to new…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>