NRL star facing a month out after playing with ruptured testicle for 45 minutes

A Warriors star is facing a month on the sideline after ignoring the pain of a ruptured testicle to keep playing for a further 45 minutes.

 
 
 

New Zealand Warriors playmaker Chanel Harris-Tavita played over 45 minutes of his team’s loss to the Melbourne Storm on Monday with a ruptured testicle.

After what has been described as one of the toughest performances of the 2022 NRL season, Harris-Tavita has already had surgery for the injury and now faces three to four weeks on the sidelines to recover.

The gruesome injury occurred when fellow teammate Josh Curran’s knee slammed into Harris-Tavita’s groin as they combined to stop Melbourne fullback Ryan Papenhuyzen scoring in the final minutes of the first half.

Long-time physiotherapist and NRL injury analyst Brien Seeney described Harris-Tavita’s effort to play through the injury as “the toughest effort of 2022” and expected the Warriors star to have been in considerable pain.

Harris-Tavita was a Warrior in the truest sense. NRL Photos
Harris-Tavita was a Warrior in the truest sense. NRL Photos

After almost two minutes being attended to on the Warriors’ goal-line, Harris-Tavita re-joined his team’s defensive line and went on to play the full 80 minutes while never missing a tackle in what was a record loss for the club.

Harris-Tavita’s injury is a further setback for the Warriors side ahead of its round eight clash against Canberra on Saturday.

The team had already lost Curran and Dallin Watene-Zelezniak to injury, plus prop Aaron Pene to suspension.

With Kodi Nikorima also unavailable after a positive Covid test and off-season signing Ash Taylor out indefinitely, Shaun Johnson is the only fit, established playmaker left.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • "ouch"is definitely an understatement here.

  • A ball and all tackle

  • After my testies rupture I stop playing with it. This kid is sick.

  • Why play with it for 45 minutes after it ruptured? Surely that's a sign to put it down....

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"My good mail is we were both at 1m and St George came through with the 5th year which was always his priority to get security with this contract"
36 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"MON has done an ok job but he's a middle of the road GM. We have the resources we need to recruit THE BEST if we want to break this drought end of story. "
39 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I just don't want Ryles to be the fuse, because as much as I wanted ba out, those above washed their hands with him, and made him totally accountable for the demise of the entire club and thats all im going to say about this subject for a while…"
59 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I dunno about MoN being " the number 1 issue with the club atm" but he can be used as a pressure valve...or a fuse if you like...something necessary but replaceable that blows when things get too hot so as to protect the actual important things.…"
1 hour ago
Joel K replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I did hear that podcast HOE, it was on BTFU. He did say 1.2m over 5 years but didn't specify any TPAs"
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"It would be competitive but would it get the deal done. Whilst I admit on the surface 950-1m appears overs I'd pay that to get the deal done. It's not overs when it's exactly what you team needs to make a massive improvement to your squad"
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Poppa I'm a fan of a Burton signing. What im saying is I don't think we are blocking Lorenzo's path if we are paying Burton right. I don't think centre would be an issue for Burton if Lorenzo becomes a must pick at some stage. He doesn't strike me…"
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Remember Rodney Hogg
"Thanks Darren, when Journos asked him for comment he always looked agrieved and sought to end the discussion.
Did you know his sullen appearance belied the fact he was quite smart, matriculating in pure and applied Maths, physics and economics.
He…"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I think you guys have a problem with Renzo as our 5/8. He is not the type of 5/8 Parra needs, unless he can defend to a certain level it will not matter how "brilliant" he is. These brilliant young players look fantastic in Reserve Grade but the…"
2 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"surely 850k for 4 years would be competetive, starting in 27"
3 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"longfin what do you mean best years are behind him at 26"
3 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"100% chief there's only 1 way to see if lorenzo is up to it"
3 hours ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Chiefy Chiefy where have i ever said we shouldn't sack either of the two YOU continually referr to on every blog that comes up . Im beginning to think one or both must have put the hard word on Mrs Chiefy or something . Most of us probably agree…"
3 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"iiongi is only 22 now yehez"
3 hours ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"So after one game? And he was playing like a fullback "
4 hours ago
Slippery. replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?

 I think the Burton/ Moses combination is perfect. The issue is the price tag attached to Burton and having upto 2.5 million invested in the halves,  especially when the Eels are currently struggling with quality in several areas. Signing Burton…"
4 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>