Graham Annesley has conceded a controversial obstruction call that cost Roosters star Joey Manu a fair try against the Panthers was wrong.

 

The NRL head of football has wasted no time conceding that video referee Chris Butler failed to use the necessary level of discretion in incorrectly deeming that Panthers fullback Dylan Edwards was obstructed from defending the no-try due to a collision with Roosters decoy runner Jared Waerea-Hargreaves.

 

The alleged obstruction from Waerea-Hargreaves on Edwards occurred 20-metres away from where Manu grounded the football.

 

The no-try call happened in the 22nd minute with the Roosters trailing 12-0 nil.

 

Instead of waiting until Tuesday’s media briefing to respond to the howler, Annesley stepped forward on Friday morning.

 

Annesley moved to differentiate the call between last weekend’s polarising decision to pull back a Manly try due to Jake Trbojevic running an obstruction against Parramatta’s Luca Moretti.

 

“Last week I supported two obstruction rulings by the Bunker,’’ Annesley said.

 

“I talked about the need for the lead runner to continue through the defensive line, and for the play not to be turned back through the gap created by a collision with a defender.

 

“Neither of these factors were present in last night’s decision (for the Manu no-try).

 

“In the circumstances, the Bunker does have discretion to consider whether a defender could have prevented the try.

 

“In my opinion, the try would have been scored regardless and the on-field decision should not have been overturned”.

 

The Daily Telegraph understands Annesley was comfortable with Butler’s decision to award Sunia Turuva a try for the Panthers even though Liam Martin ran through as the lead runner and interfered with Sitili Tupouniua and Luke Keary as they came across in cover defence.

 

***************

How many calls go Penriths way? It's dead set embarrassing and blatant favoritism. Whether it's 50/50 calls like this or their players not getting suspended 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Latest comments

Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Analyst, That says Melb was about to sign him and the NRL would sign off on it.
Trechery!!!...Betrayal!!!...Snakes!!!
Get at 'em!!!
 "
34 seconds ago
Archie replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
" I THINK IT IS, NOT NECESSARILY THE START BUT MORE THE PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT."
6 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"This isn't over. Vlandys silence on our behalf says it all. If he pushes us again we should expose him"
6 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"The new chairman we have has got balls! Just what we have needed for years...Indeed. You gotta set the tone"
10 minutes ago
Eelovution replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Randy get back onto your meds. At this level of finance and legal stature, protocol always haas the highest official of the club, the president signing off. Not MON or Jim."
14 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"So why isn't the NRL, vocally supporting us.
Mon signed off on the release. If we lose he did done fuck up. Yell him now his job is riding on this. Put his skin in the game so he understands he needs to fight"
20 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Please read and understand what Muttman has said hereunder Randy, the NRL are not our enemy in this process. Its very much in the NRL interests to be strongly in accordance with Parramatta......what don't you understand about that?
We are the attack…"
21 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Are you OK Randy? "
27 minutes ago
TolEllts replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I hope this is the start of something great for the club culture"
30 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"I think it would be a safe assumption that the nrl would be keen to have Lomax sign with storm. Particularly with us playing them in rd 1. Drama sells tickets."
32 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"I have been saying that we are fighting Lomax AND NRL. I am proud of us for fighting. Now we have to fight on both fronts. We can do it but we will have to hold our nerve. Allies will appear"
32 minutes ago
Eelovution replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"When proceedings commence we should ask for surety (bond deposit) by Lomax to cover his costs in case he loses the case as costs will be awarded against him. I would also think that Lomaxs agents look at their professional indemnity insurance as…"
38 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Yeah we called THEIR bluff. Vlandys is in this up to his eyeballs and he is a vainglorious beastie. The out of court game has to be fought too  I think we can do this  Drag out court mediation. Drag out court  make a noise. Be the squeakywheel. We…"
40 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Very good report card. I like that the lawyer we are using has expertise in restraint of trade which is the only flawed argument Lomax has."
50 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"We don't fight so he thought he was good....but, ruh-roh...we are learning"
52 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"I wish this all happened a month ago. I wonder if south's could have been tempted for a swap between he and keon, and the extra year of a bumped up contract may have been enough for us to land keon. Frustrating but no point living in what ifs"
54 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1954

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 256

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>