Graham Annesley has conceded a controversial obstruction call that cost Roosters star Joey Manu a fair try against the Panthers was wrong.

 

The NRL head of football has wasted no time conceding that video referee Chris Butler failed to use the necessary level of discretion in incorrectly deeming that Panthers fullback Dylan Edwards was obstructed from defending the no-try due to a collision with Roosters decoy runner Jared Waerea-Hargreaves.

 

The alleged obstruction from Waerea-Hargreaves on Edwards occurred 20-metres away from where Manu grounded the football.

 

The no-try call happened in the 22nd minute with the Roosters trailing 12-0 nil.

 

Instead of waiting until Tuesday’s media briefing to respond to the howler, Annesley stepped forward on Friday morning.

 

Annesley moved to differentiate the call between last weekend’s polarising decision to pull back a Manly try due to Jake Trbojevic running an obstruction against Parramatta’s Luca Moretti.

 

“Last week I supported two obstruction rulings by the Bunker,’’ Annesley said.

 

“I talked about the need for the lead runner to continue through the defensive line, and for the play not to be turned back through the gap created by a collision with a defender.

 

“Neither of these factors were present in last night’s decision (for the Manu no-try).

 

“In the circumstances, the Bunker does have discretion to consider whether a defender could have prevented the try.

 

“In my opinion, the try would have been scored regardless and the on-field decision should not have been overturned”.

 

The Daily Telegraph understands Annesley was comfortable with Butler’s decision to award Sunia Turuva a try for the Panthers even though Liam Martin ran through as the lead runner and interfered with Sitili Tupouniua and Luke Keary as they came across in cover defence.

 

***************

How many calls go Penriths way? It's dead set embarrassing and blatant favoritism. Whether it's 50/50 calls like this or their players not getting suspended 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Latest comments

Muttman replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Restraint of trade is a week argument given that: - He signed fully informed with legal advice - He has employment opportunities and has received offers from outside the NRL. I think a likely outcome will be perhaps the restraint is shortened or…"
35 seconds ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Thanks for posting this Badger.
interesting!
so, I'd love someone to clarify for me,  is it really restraint of trade tho when he was offered a contract to apply his trade with Union (albeit in a 450K deal)? It might be less than he was on but that…"
40 seconds ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"I mean, lopping his head off with a massive fucking sword is quite the escalation, but have at it if you must"
40 seconds ago
Blue Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"I'm hearing that the matter is also listed on the 29th January as well as a full hearing for 2 days from the 12/13 February.
The 29th has been made available because the Eels may be looking into Zac making false or misleading statements to them…"
3 minutes ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Exactly what I think there mate! And btw pretty sure nrl have stated any manager discussing things with R360 is banned which I think his managers have denied. Yet the bloke wants a release to play R360 yeah nah. It was organised that's my conspiracy…"
6 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Have you read his managers statment from 17/1?...Macy posted it..  Enjlightening read
zerotackle.com/lomaxs-manager-provides-contract-update-defends-star...
 "
6 minutes ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Surely BE, we wouldn't have anything to stand on tho if playing as only centre for us was in writing.
though he made it clear excuse he left dragons so tgat he could persue boxing for which they wouldn't insure him at saints and moving to us was the…"
10 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Wow Mace. That press release seems fucking crazy from them. That's why he was the only player who thought r360 would get off the ground and actually broke contract for it.....because he didn't, the sneaky prick. 
 "
11 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Now that makes more sense then what was reported."
16 minutes ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"It would be nice! But just be sure we will pay not that I care tbh we can handle it ...I think🫤
reckon they wouldn't be too happy with lomax's managent putting V’landys few words on this out there 🫢"
16 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"FMD....This Stinks"
20 minutes ago
HKF replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Yep, just checked the highlights from that game, lomax played right wing and Russell played left centre."
23 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Mace, posting about NRL's hand in this can help. It puts it out there, which they hate. Enough continued noise and the press might pick it up and run with it. Some backchanneling by a club or 2 would ignite it. The fact we fear and face…"
24 minutes ago
HKF replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Although selected at centre for round 5 against the dragons I'm pretty sure he actually played wing and he looked very unhappy in that game even though he played very good. To me it stuck out like a sore thumb how unhappy he looked."
28 minutes ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Doubt storm would've taken this all in board without seeking some kind of word from nrl myself? You? (Was gonna reply with your name after "You?" But it just didn't sound right Randy) ha
nothing to stop them now Lomax is a free agent.
boy I'd love…"
31 minutes ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Lomax is arguing restraint of trade. Eels to subpoena Storm, Shit-cough-ski and Lomax's other lawyer.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/lomax-set-for-courtroom-showdown-..."
33 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1958

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 262

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>