Graham Annesley has conceded a controversial obstruction call that cost Roosters star Joey Manu a fair try against the Panthers was wrong.

 

The NRL head of football has wasted no time conceding that video referee Chris Butler failed to use the necessary level of discretion in incorrectly deeming that Panthers fullback Dylan Edwards was obstructed from defending the no-try due to a collision with Roosters decoy runner Jared Waerea-Hargreaves.

 

The alleged obstruction from Waerea-Hargreaves on Edwards occurred 20-metres away from where Manu grounded the football.

 

The no-try call happened in the 22nd minute with the Roosters trailing 12-0 nil.

 

Instead of waiting until Tuesday’s media briefing to respond to the howler, Annesley stepped forward on Friday morning.

 

Annesley moved to differentiate the call between last weekend’s polarising decision to pull back a Manly try due to Jake Trbojevic running an obstruction against Parramatta’s Luca Moretti.

 

“Last week I supported two obstruction rulings by the Bunker,’’ Annesley said.

 

“I talked about the need for the lead runner to continue through the defensive line, and for the play not to be turned back through the gap created by a collision with a defender.

 

“Neither of these factors were present in last night’s decision (for the Manu no-try).

 

“In the circumstances, the Bunker does have discretion to consider whether a defender could have prevented the try.

 

“In my opinion, the try would have been scored regardless and the on-field decision should not have been overturned”.

 

The Daily Telegraph understands Annesley was comfortable with Butler’s decision to award Sunia Turuva a try for the Panthers even though Liam Martin ran through as the lead runner and interfered with Sitili Tupouniua and Luke Keary as they came across in cover defence.

 

***************

How many calls go Penriths way? It's dead set embarrassing and blatant favoritism. Whether it's 50/50 calls like this or their players not getting suspended 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Latest comments

Parra fan on The Hill replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"So happy for the win. They have played their guts out vs Knights, Dogs and Raiders so we deserved a win.
There is a lack of quality and playing their guts out won't save us when we can't complete sets because of park footy knock- ons.
We desperately…"
4 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"He is a space cadet. Ryley gives us so much more."
4 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"All the arguments and negativity....apologies guys what a WIN GO PARRA ....one thing we may fight and disagree a great night"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"Sanders showed tonight he has a long way to go still. He was average at best."
5 hours ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Issue is, he is playing well lately, but also playing for a contract. If you can have him on a 1 year deal, sure why not. But on a long term deal could be a risk."
5 hours ago
JC replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"The touchy called that one."
5 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Totally get where you're coming from. I can't help but think how good he can be when he wants to. "
5 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"I understand where your coming from Angry but I still think we'd be better off using that roster spot for someone who will take that opportunity and prove they belong. He has a poor commitment level and professionalism."
6 hours ago
D_STOFFBERG replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 iongi, 2 Volkman, 1 kelma"
6 hours ago
Eels95 replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"The forward pass one was a deadset disgrace.  I was in line with it. Went back 2m"
6 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"Oh my beautiful boys....a win!  But getting punished by ziggy relentlessy with 6agains but alas none for us, our defence won us the game. and wthout a goal-kicker in the side. What about our 1st try. Samrani can do that, always surprising the…"
6 hours ago
Joel K replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 iongi
2 Williams
1 Volk and B Kelly"
6 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 Points - Canberra Angels, didn't give away one 6 again all game. Special mention to Ricky Stuart and his face after the loss. Priceless
2 Points -  Eels 63% Completions with 8 minutes to go , kept inviting the Raiders Back into the game. The…"
6 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Some fair points there. If he's cheap enough is he worth using as depth in the middle though "
6 hours ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"Ionghi 3
Kautoga 2
Kelly 1
Honourable mentions to Edwards and Williams
 "
6 hours ago
Will 5150 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"Great result... well done lads, gritty and scrappy at times but some massive heart in defence... kudos.
Iongi... quality. The pass for the Kit Kat try, just wow.
Kit Kat... great.
Samrani... big potential there.
Kelly and JDB often maligned... but…"
6 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>