Graham Annesley has conceded a controversial obstruction call that cost Roosters star Joey Manu a fair try against the Panthers was wrong.

 

The NRL head of football has wasted no time conceding that video referee Chris Butler failed to use the necessary level of discretion in incorrectly deeming that Panthers fullback Dylan Edwards was obstructed from defending the no-try due to a collision with Roosters decoy runner Jared Waerea-Hargreaves.

 

The alleged obstruction from Waerea-Hargreaves on Edwards occurred 20-metres away from where Manu grounded the football.

 

The no-try call happened in the 22nd minute with the Roosters trailing 12-0 nil.

 

Instead of waiting until Tuesday’s media briefing to respond to the howler, Annesley stepped forward on Friday morning.

 

Annesley moved to differentiate the call between last weekend’s polarising decision to pull back a Manly try due to Jake Trbojevic running an obstruction against Parramatta’s Luca Moretti.

 

“Last week I supported two obstruction rulings by the Bunker,’’ Annesley said.

 

“I talked about the need for the lead runner to continue through the defensive line, and for the play not to be turned back through the gap created by a collision with a defender.

 

“Neither of these factors were present in last night’s decision (for the Manu no-try).

 

“In the circumstances, the Bunker does have discretion to consider whether a defender could have prevented the try.

 

“In my opinion, the try would have been scored regardless and the on-field decision should not have been overturned”.

 

The Daily Telegraph understands Annesley was comfortable with Butler’s decision to award Sunia Turuva a try for the Panthers even though Liam Martin ran through as the lead runner and interfered with Sitili Tupouniua and Luke Keary as they came across in cover defence.

 

***************

How many calls go Penriths way? It's dead set embarrassing and blatant favoritism. Whether it's 50/50 calls like this or their players not getting suspended 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Latest comments

will replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Just playing devil's advocate here,  but wasn't Galvin still under contract with the tigers when Parra was trying to recruit him?
We are arguing that there is one rule for the storm and one rule us, but really we do it too"
49 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"LB, Here's the 1EE top 20 most viewed


Brett Finch on Matty Johns podcast (Fish, 2019)


Signing news (PouPou, 2019)


The Parramatta GOAT (Super, 2020)


Some big rumours circulating (Chief, 2025)


Dylan Brown open to offers (Super, 2025)


Dylan…"
3 hours ago
Kurupt - 1 Year Cuck replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Probably 2009 Melbourne Under Bellamy Saga"
4 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"May I ask for what no.1 is?"
5 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"In two days, this blog has currently rocketed up the charts to 15th most popular blog in 1EE history, and second most popular posted in January. Well done to all the contributors! "
6 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"It was he could not sign any Melbourne players for 2025. Yet mid 2025 it could be Storm tried poaching Lomax."
7 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"yawn.  you see what suits you.. We will see
We can win in court and still get strong-armed by Vlandys to play nice, just not with Melb"
7 hours ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"LB, I am assuming that the Ryles distancing himself from Melb is for a season, not a year, technically he is past a year from him leaving Storm anyway. Also contact has already been established via are us contracting a Storm player already."
8 hours ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Do you understand what step in and mediate means Randolph.
I agree with Anasta the NRL doesn't need to be involved, we assume those statements were made before the court case and Parramatta's statement.
The smartness of Parra's move is so the Storm…"
8 hours ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"The NRL is preparing to step in and mediate the growing contract standoff involving Zac Lomax, Parramatta and Melbourne, with the representative back remaining stuck in career limbo.
According to reports from The Sydney Morning Herald, Melbourne…"
8 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"I know some are laughable."
9 hours ago
Yehez replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"To'a? Foketi? Hubner!!????"
10 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"Brimson I don't mind actually. He's a risk but could be a nice piece at 6 in 2027."
10 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"I'd have no issues with Burton. I have an issue of Lomax with the Dogs."
10 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"yeah the court is only ruling on the validity of owning Zac's NrL playing rights. It would be up to the clubs to offer the right player for the Eels during negotiations  to fully release Zac to them."
10 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Is that knitting talk?....cool, cool.... What are you knitting a case for?"
11 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1967

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 263

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>