For the last four days the number of new (reported) COVID cases have declined from a peak of 400/day down to 186/day and decreasing (for now anyway). And for every 100 tests only one positive case is identified. 

So we are agressively testing and there are only 3000 known cases in Australia. As should be expected 3000 or even 6000 is no where near critical mass when no one is going to work, school or public transport. 

People are stuck at home going broke.

But if the draconian restrictions are completely lifted or the decreased risks causes fear to turn to carelessness then it will take off.

So what now, do the restrictions stay in place with minimal new cases while we go broke? Do they try and partially lift them to maintain a steady flow of cases and immunity for survivors - this could be difficult to manage and still send most broke. If they are fully lifted they may as well not had them in the first place.

Can Australia be compartmentalised to let some populations get run through while others get no infections - thus keeping the total burden manageable? This would seem like the best scenario if achievable.

Or can we get volunteers to get it and go into self isolation until they are over it and immune. The benefit is that they know they have ICU beds available if required and will be immune if they get through. This will build up the herd immunity. Deliberate infection is the easiest way to control the spread so that the number of positive cases do not overwhelm our health system. This would also get us back to normalty fastest. Otherwise we will face recurring/partial/ful restrictions that will send many broke. 40% of businesses are predicted to go under.

Maybe they could start with NRL players. Throw them a COVID party (no phones/cameras allowed) and get them all infected while they are not training and immunosupressed. Then when they have recovered we can restart the season

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Problem is that COVID may be contained but will not be eradicated. So if there is a relaxation then it is likely to take off again.

      It is a health risk for players who are being pushed to the limits. Extreme physical activity suppresses the immune system and they will be at substantial risk of severe infection.

      The other problem with having COVID under control is that there will keep being a small number of cases for a long time with the entire population at risk until vaccines come out. 

      Maybe the only way to restart the season is to let it run through the NRL and get it over with

      • Wile, not a completely crazy idea. Crazy times sometimes call for extreme measures?!

        I was reading that epidemiologists are debating whether this Coronavirus will become a seasonal endemic. If so, this should lead all the rational people to continually get vaccinated against it. I guess the issue will be whether SARS-CoV-2 varies seasonally like Influenza A and B do? We better hope not as it's 10 times more deadly. 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Dr Wong, don't worry about footballers, imagine asking any human to do that....

      • just reopen the schools for a week and that should sort ou the bulldogs...

        • Ouch!  LOL

      • Correct, Meelk, but Wong was only talking about Storm players? Don't they deserve all the misfortune that might come their way?

        • I heard the Storm players all got the virus, but then they were stripped of it because they cheated on their tests, but then Todd Greenburg quiently acknowledged they all had the virus by sending their wives diamond rings.

  • I wouldn't throw a party just yet or state that it's in decline. Not yet at least. 
    There's a view that we are under testing currently and when the new antibodies test comes in next week or so we'll see another spike in cases. 
    Hospitals are still gearing up for impending new severe cases which will occupy ICU beds. 
    I work in the medical space and have my entire career. If Doctors are still worried I'd suggest we should be also. Stay the course for now. 

    • Australia currently lead the world in testing per capita. 

      • Mutt man voice of reason!!!

        Read we only got 100k kits and drs pleading for more HKF. Only testing for those with symptoms is my understanding ... which of course sadly isn't enough. 
        the new pin prick kits arriving should go to all medics and front liners so at least they can tell if they are immune from having had it. It's imperative we protect theses brave souls for what's coming.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Let's wait and see. Anasta has also admitted it was "speculation",  based on loud noises.
NAS admitted he'd been approached, but 'like others' he was "waiting" to see how it pans out.
It's hard to know with R360. They have guaranteed funding for…"
20 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"I just don't see it going down like that. Ryles is his buddyguy, so let's just see who starts rnd1"
31 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"and I wouldn't call 1yr a "stint"...maybe a "stunt" or a "layover" but not a stint"
39 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"Interesting way to look at it. Does that mean we are looking that way at others with no contract with us past this year, ie
Dylan Walker
Junior Paulo
Josh Addo Carr
Ryan Matterson
and the other 4 or 5
 "
40 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"If it outguns Papalii in the preseason why wouldn't we play him in firsts. Love how Ryles said "we will just let them fight it out in preseason". 
 "
44 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"No they won't the position is Pezets to lose.Theyll say competition but there won't be Pezet will be Parras 6 next year.
Garrick and Simonsson to potentially to offset the loss of Lomax.god only at the Eels can you lose talent like Brown and the…"
46 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"It's gone quiet so let's wait and see, Braith hasn't said anything really since he broke that rumour "
50 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"So you'd prefer to sacrifice the 2026 season because you don't like the donkeys.  That's a great strategical move Coryn. Im glad you're nowhere near recruitment & retention champion. "
51 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Hope not I don't care what anyone says we can't afford to lose Lomax.Our back 5 is piss poor without him."
55 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"Did you read what Ryles said.  They'll battle it out in the pre season and the 6 jumper isn't black and white "
55 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Rabz S's discussion Jonah Pezet Joins Parramatta Eels - OFFICIAL
""
56 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"Tbf just reading this post it sounds like something Braith said weeks ago lol, don't think any new Lomax info has come out "
56 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"WHy? I think we truly wanted him long term but as we saw with Dylan, if someone's not in the plans they get dropped. Because Hawkins was leaving we thought might as well get this guy for 1 year to provide cover but also play when Moses away/injured…"
57 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"Why bullshit? Do we owe him a spot in the 17? It's not like we need to worry about losing him. He's already gone."
57 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"FUCK FUCK fffaaaarrrrrrkk."
59 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion Lomax Gone
"As long as Simonsson is around and up for it, this is no big deal and alleviates some space. If we sign Garrick, even better.
Simonsson - Penisini - Garrick - AddoCarr      is quite a good backline.
 "
1 hour ago
More…

 

Lomax Gone

Just listening to Braith Anasta who has stated that Lomax won't be playing with Parra in 2026 and that's he's basically signed with Rugby Union. Anasta reckons he will not play NRL again and will likely move to UK to prepare for the October start of…

Read more…
26 Replies · Reply by Hell On Eels 20 minutes ago
Views: 719

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>