Matthew Johns shows his class.

Matt wrote an acorticle this morning in the Telegraph titled "A PUNCHY NSW REPLY."                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   He covered Madge's dig at Slater and then went on to surprise with his insight of the coming duel between the centres in the upcoming origin. Have a look.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Sorry guys just had a visit from an electrician to do a replacement wall socket so the power had to be stopped for 10 minutes. The appeal of the story was not just Johns knowledge of the intricasies of the match-ups but the picturres he painted in your mind of the skirmishes to come. Matt has just elevated himself to a higher level in my mind.

  • Definitely a classy guy, always brings wipes to a GB.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions — It's Over Folks Before Main Hearing Begins
"Excellent Club Statement
 
The Parramatta Eels today provide the following update regarding Zac Lomax and proceedings involving the Melbourne Storm.
In November 2025 as part of Zac Lomax’s release from the remaining three years of his contract with…"
9 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"See what I think alot get concerned about was the distraction Lomax Melbourne and the NRL were trying to bring into this where we just stuck to a water tight agreement and the high ground was ours.Not restraint of trade PVL saying he's trying to…"
11 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Yep that's what I thought too. V'landys will stop at nothing to keep Melbourne in the winning circles. The evidence we now have likely points to that. What else do we want from the NRL now that we have them by the balls?"
12 minutes ago
Axel replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"He often takes on the contrarian role. I think that's his assigned position on that show....and yes, he is annoying!"
16 minutes ago
TolEllts replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Nice to see that it went our way. Maybe Vlandy had advised Melbourne and Lomax to let it go to avoid their shenanigans being exposed. Good for the club to standing up to NRL and Storms 'bullying'. Go PARRA!"
17 minutes ago
Eels tragic replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Exactly, Mutts article actually says that Lomax cannot join Melbourne unless Parra give written consent.  "
21 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion One of these 6 players will be an Eel
""
21 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"We are only thinking of the good of the game 😜"
27 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I wouldn't have a clue mate. Its just what some were saying on social media. But now with the outcome settled it was obviously bollocks"
27 minutes ago
Pato replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Here you go Chief, this might help explain it for you:
 
FULL STATEMENT FROM EELS
The Parramatta Eels today provide the following update regarding Zac Lomax and proceedings involving the Melbourne Storm.
In November 2025 as part of Zac Lomax’s…"
27 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Yep. Lomax's, $250K of ours plus theirs "
28 minutes ago
Anguillidae replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion One of these 6 players will be an Eel
"Just add an 'N' at the start of the title. Simples."
28 minutes ago
Phil Mann replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"As I read it, the storm are paying $250 toward our legal costs but in addition they will have to look after their own, so it's $250k +
Hope they engaged their legal team on a: "no win, no fee" basis!!   hahaha"
30 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I have a feeling the NRL will be pretty nice to us for a while given we obviously have a few smoking guns they obviously don't want public."
31 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Just one question, and i don't think it will matter much because Lomax will get a league deal somewhere  -  was the 3 years  reduced to 2 as part of an agreement between the two clubs or was it ordered by the courts.
Thats the only part that is…"
32 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion One of these 6 players will be an Eel
"moale has a 3yr deal at manly starting in 27"
33 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2145

 

What's the Iongi Update?

Does anyone else find it weird that the chat on Iongi has gone very quiet? We've heard nothing from the NRL or the club directly, only through newspaper articles.May it be because the NRL don't see it as much of a serious issue? What do we think?…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Acme 18 hours ago
Views: 1140

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>