Square-Eyed blog

Seen a decent flick of late? Or a horrible one? Anything good of late on the TV or streaming box.

This is 1Eyed's official blog for all things movies, television, etc....

Hat-tip to Sneaky Pete who started this blog, and I've hi-jacked...

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I've read that it's being rated by many as one of the worst ever. The reviews have been terrible and there have been alot of walkouts and demands for refunds - ouch!

    I have to admit I'm not Will Ferrell's biggest fan - he can be a bit hit and miss and tends to be better in cameo - type rolls. His performance in Wedding Crashers was outstanding - ""Ma! . . The meatloaf! . . . F*ck! . . ."

    • Anchorman was outstanding, Talledega Nights & Blades of Glory were also great, Step Brothers was OK for the first hour, and yes his cameo in Wedding Crashers was brilliant, but other than that a lot of his stuff falls a bit flat. 

      • Don't forget Old School. Will Ferrell as Frank the Tank was brilliant.

        Also Elf, which will remain one of the classic Christmas movies.

        • I never saw Old School or Elf.

          Anchorman was his high water mark, it's a pity that they had to ruin it with the God awful sequel.

        • Good point Elvis - Old School was class :)

          600683505?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • The best Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson were Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce. They made 14 Holmes movies and they are all addictive. Watch these two below and you may go looking for the other 12 to watch

  • horribly BAD movie. I fell asleep.

  • Haven't seen it and by the sounds of it think I'll give it a miss. Hope Netflix doesn't get it!

  • Hey Sneaky, I hope you don't mind, but I think it would be a great idea to have a single long-running for movie and television reviews and discussion, and given you've given us a great start, I've hi-jacked your blog for this purpose!

  • Kids are wanting to see Aqua Man. Should I bother?

    Read very mixed reviews on it?

    What's the best New Year movies to go and see?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Alarms going off you reckon?"
10 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Maybe I didn't phrase my comment well post 2026. To be honest I'm not getting too hung up on the storm and what may or may not happen. I'd take Harry Grant or Cameron Munster off their hands, but we all know realistically that ain't happening. If…"
13 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Absolutely, all that stuff that's gone on goes in our favour with the judge in making his determination.
I don't think we're being vindictive at all towards Lomax. We just want to be adequately compensated for our loss which is a fair enough…"
21 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"You could potentially ban him from playing against the eels for the term of his contract but how is that fair on the other clubs who have to face Storm who get an origin winger for a 200k transfer. If Lomax really wants to play nrl then open it up…"
25 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Adam, that would be some meeting behind closed doors: us, the NRL, the Storm, some who-me-yes-you poker faces, and enough blowtorches to keep the fire exits relevant."
30 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Storm either get him this year or not at all, so player swap next year is quite impossible. But I agree I think a swap is hard as Melbourne are that proud in what they are doing they won't have a sense of losing by caving in.
Yeah he ain't sitting…"
45 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I don't think the eels want to keep Lomax out of the game they are open to sending him to any club who wants him. But the way the storm and Lomax acted trying to sneak around it, I doubt eels want to deal with Melbourne. Ryles seems like a man of…"
45 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Denan Kemp said, and he is right, Melbourne cannot say no to a player of theirs asking for a release again.
The main thing out of this is Melbourne do not give a flying you know what how people see them in this. If they win the comp this year all…"
50 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"As much as I'd like Lomax to sit out from the nrl for the next 3 years (and he should) realistically that isn't happening. It isn't fair.
That is what this court case is all about, to determine what is fair. So it isn't 100% right or 100% wrong (or…"
58 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"He was provided all the legal advice before signing the release and understood the stipulations. Just because R360 didn't eventuate doesn't mean he can force his way out of it lol. Spoilt brat defence is not going to work for Lomax or the storm 🤣 "
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"LB, Eli, good stuff gents. We've acted in good-faith. By the book. With clean hands. Lomax appears not to. Still, equity is not unlikely to view an NRL-wide 3-year restraint until 31Oct 28' as overly-punitive and read it down.
We'd still win,…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The best thing for the Eels is if we say nothing our position is clear we only have to come back to the table if Melbourne come with something we see as advantageous for us that really is the bottom line.
Best thing about this there the ones doing…"
4 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
9 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I know i have said it before but Storm fans say we are being unreasonable and see no outcome in which we win this case. Despite all the released, that is still the belief. I believe in bias and backing your team but come on.
But i do not think they…"
10 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Wouldn't shock me if storm come to the table at the 11th hour with Howarth and the transfer fee. No way in hell they win this in court "
10 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Same, Kurupt. Whatever the outcome, Jim, Beach, Ryles and the club stood united and stood their ground when they were meant to roll over for the Storm and PLV, discreetly. Moses SC has also been brilliant."
11 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2092

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>