Square-Eyed blog

Seen a decent flick of late? Or a horrible one? Anything good of late on the TV or streaming box.

This is 1Eyed's official blog for all things movies, television, etc....

Hat-tip to Sneaky Pete who started this blog, and I've hi-jacked...

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I've read that it's being rated by many as one of the worst ever. The reviews have been terrible and there have been alot of walkouts and demands for refunds - ouch!

    I have to admit I'm not Will Ferrell's biggest fan - he can be a bit hit and miss and tends to be better in cameo - type rolls. His performance in Wedding Crashers was outstanding - ""Ma! . . The meatloaf! . . . F*ck! . . ."

    • Anchorman was outstanding, Talledega Nights & Blades of Glory were also great, Step Brothers was OK for the first hour, and yes his cameo in Wedding Crashers was brilliant, but other than that a lot of his stuff falls a bit flat. 

      • Don't forget Old School. Will Ferrell as Frank the Tank was brilliant.

        Also Elf, which will remain one of the classic Christmas movies.

        • I never saw Old School or Elf.

          Anchorman was his high water mark, it's a pity that they had to ruin it with the God awful sequel.

        • Good point Elvis - Old School was class :)

          600683505?profile=RESIZE_710x

  • The best Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson were Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce. They made 14 Holmes movies and they are all addictive. Watch these two below and you may go looking for the other 12 to watch

  • horribly BAD movie. I fell asleep.

  • Haven't seen it and by the sounds of it think I'll give it a miss. Hope Netflix doesn't get it!

  • Hey Sneaky, I hope you don't mind, but I think it would be a great idea to have a single long-running for movie and television reviews and discussion, and given you've given us a great start, I've hi-jacked your blog for this purpose!

  • Kids are wanting to see Aqua Man. Should I bother?

    Read very mixed reviews on it?

    What's the best New Year movies to go and see?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

HKF replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"spoiler alert, this might be a clue."
3 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"HOE i wonder if the plan is for Smith to be like Walker once he moves on?"
9 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
""
23 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Glad you said it and not me, I said similar a few months ago and got called out that i had no idea about anything.
I know stats are not always the main indicator of player performance, but Smith had 0 Try Assists in 2025. Now TDS has only one in his…"
23 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"LB, Clint, Pops. I’m also on the “both are great to have” bus, and they complement each other. My only question mark is the long-term sustainability of keeping both. TDS is tied up, but I'd say the club would be keen to extend Ryley before Nov 1st…"
56 minutes ago
Acme replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Top class hookers worth 550-600? I'm no pimp but I'm sure they're worth a lot more than that"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Well Ryles was adament, even after Smith debuted that he wanted a 2nd Hooker. Tried to get Brailey for a while.
He must see Smith as something else. But i do not see him signing Da Silva on decent coin and for so many years just to be a 14 or…"
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Da Silva is a potentially elite dummy half. He would already be on very good money, probably $600k+ and will eventually be taking the majority of minutes at dummy half. Perhaps as early as 2026. Smith might start every game but could end up only…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Yes to all that!"
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Smith is great at the effort areas but he is a one trick pony. He offers very little in attack."
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Rabz S's discussion Parramatta Eels extend Josh Addo-Carr
"He was a try-scoring machine, but fuck his defence was deplorable. Just imagine where Semi would be sitting on this list is he'd have stayed in League..."
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Agree LB, it's actually great that we have 2 different hookers that provide a bit of a point of a difference from each other for a change."
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"It's for turning up late to training."
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"He's a gun. Go and watch the Eels/Tigers Preseason trial match from last year, he tore us apart. I think he just needs some time with Moses. He also needs some creative license when he comes off the bench and can't just be a ball distributer like…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"It is, I think a TCT article the other week confirmed it. Must have been late to training."
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Its is almost a physcological trait of the site. 
It seems to me that once some consensus comes through that people on here have their minds made up for them. Then that is it.
My initial reaction to TDS was not that positive, that said after…"
2 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>