Does anyone know much about stamp duty?

The timing couldn't be worse. I've just reached settlement on my first property and did intend on making it an investment. I've paid stamp duty but due to corona everyone's spooked and I can't find someone to rent it. I'm thinking of I might as well just move in myself. Does this mean I get a refund on stamp duty as I would then meet the criteria for the first home buyers assistance scheme?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • don't know about that but if you move in and make it your primary place of residence for more than 6 months then even if you then rent it out and claim negative gearing you may not have to pay capital gains if you sell - used to be that way - you would need to get proper advice

    • Thanks mate.

       

  • I know that itis the duty of a stamp to see your mail arrives safely at it's destination.

     

     

  • OK so you are playing the tax game to the max.

    Buy and own property for investment but rent elsewhere.

    In the current environment you have certainly landed in a shit heap.

    If it was me and living in the house for next 12 months or so was not too difficult then do it.

    Vacant for more than 60 days and any insurance you have on the investment/rental property is non existent (uninsured)

    Here's the next scenario - IF you are umlucky enough to find a tennant to move in, in the near future, after a week or so they claim NO RENT because of employment due to Corrona virus and you cop it up the arse.

    As for stamp duty I have NFI.

  • First Home Owner Grant should apply to you. There are a couple so check your eligibility.  Visit Revenue NSW website and go to Grants.  Assuming you are eligible, you must live in the home within 12 months of settlement for a period of 6 months minimum. If land only, you need to build a house ( I think within 2 years of settlement). Of course, if you keep as an investment then your are not entitled to any exemption nor concession.  Best bet, check the Revenue NSW website 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Eelawarra's discussion BYES SCRAPPED, 19-ROUND NRL DRAW, ORIGIN WINDOW : ARLC EXPLORING BIGGEST SCHEDULING OVERHAUL IN 40 YEARS
"Its 14 less. Have they go with the same amount of rounds with more teams its 50 more games.
Are you going to pay more money as a tv station or streamer for almost the same amount and less weeks overall of TV content? 
The TV stations will say we get…"
1 hour ago
HKF replied to Eelawarra's discussion BYES SCRAPPED, 19-ROUND NRL DRAW, ORIGIN WINDOW : ARLC EXPLORING BIGGEST SCHEDULING OVERHAUL IN 40 YEARS
"With more teams it's almost exactly the same amount of games in total. "
2 hours ago
LB replied to Eelawarra's discussion BYES SCRAPPED, 19-ROUND NRL DRAW, ORIGIN WINDOW : ARLC EXPLORING BIGGEST SCHEDULING OVERHAUL IN 40 YEARS
"Issue is since they have done this they cannot go back. Dan Ginnane said that last year once you go to 27 rounds you cannot go back. If you do it is to 26 rounds. 
Shorter season is exactly what Bennett is saying is the issue, i have said it for…"
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eelawarra's discussion BYES SCRAPPED, 19-ROUND NRL DRAW, ORIGIN WINDOW : ARLC EXPLORING BIGGEST SCHEDULING OVERHAUL IN 40 YEARS
"Caution: Meddlling Ahead."
4 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Eelawarra's discussion BYES SCRAPPED, 19-ROUND NRL DRAW, ORIGIN WINDOW : ARLC EXPLORING BIGGEST SCHEDULING OVERHAUL IN 40 YEARS
"People will still complain because they will have more away games against better teams compared to other teams or different turn around times.
I think a shorter season and stand alone rep period is the best option and over due though."
4 hours ago
LB replied to Eelawarra's discussion BYES SCRAPPED, 19-ROUND NRL DRAW, ORIGIN WINDOW : ARLC EXPLORING BIGGEST SCHEDULING OVERHAUL IN 40 YEARS
"Yeah great, players don't complain when their salaries are lowered from less product for tv."
4 hours ago
EA replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"I really wanted Popo and Petrus to get a pre season. "
6 hours ago
EA replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Other than Farrugia and Johnasson, not sure if any other SG ball players have left us?"
6 hours ago
paul taylor replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Mate , lot of Sg ball players moved on to other clubs already .  Kids these days won't wait if they can not see a direct path to nrl .  Everyone of the sg ball players doing the nrl pre season are all capable of playing nrl .  This next 6 weeks is…"
6 hours ago
EA replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Dom De Stradis reminds of Briton Nikora. Wish we tried to see if he could make it in the NRL. The others leaving doesn't bother me as I don't think they will make the NRL. These bunch are from a very successful group of juniors coming through (some…"
7 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Why is that EA?"
7 hours ago
EA replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Have you seen that we did not resign many of our JF graduates. Disappointed we didnt keep Dom De Stradis. Going to Redcliffe. Looks like T Brown is the only JF graduate we have kept. Neemia, Samuela, Spence, Lynn, Lewis, Raf De Stradis, Samuela, etc…"
7 hours ago
paul taylor replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Reckon he stays lomax.  Good coin , in elite level these days , we are progressing nicely and I honestly believe we will compete for a premiership in 2026 and 2027.   We need one of the mentioned possible signings to happen and I believe we are the…"
7 hours ago
Hector replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Exactly Dave  the merry go  round  keeps on going round and round i. Just keep on getting a massive headache with all this shit just gets rehashed and rehashed over and over and over again and again "
8 hours ago
Slippery. replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.

 When comparing players, ability is only half the comparison. The other important part is the amount the players are being paid. When comparing the loss of a higher paid player with his replacement on less money, you must include the money saved…"
9 hours ago
Clayton replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"That is a fundamentalist assessment of the salary cap. More intricate than that. "
9 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>