Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Daley “Moses injury is so minor he could probably play for Parra this weekend”
""
19 seconds ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"But I thought you loved ugly Petes "innovations"?

 "
1 minute ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"All this doesn’t prove the game is “broken,”...agreed. The overpaced, fatigue riddled ref-a-thon points blitz that hurts my eyes & feelings is what proves to me the game is broken.
I would hazard that Ugly Pete pushed that other guy (can't remember…"
6 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V'landyball: The Momentum Wars
"Hoey, as you know I am not a stats man but what you outlined in considerable detail is outstanding.
I read your "death zone" notes early in the season and have been quoting them regularly since then to both Parra and other club supporters.
I think…"
7 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Yeah Anasta said we got him for a good deal. Really could be anything. But also could be more than letting on as when talking about him he was in protective mode as many were knocking the signing so Anasta was saying all these things to Parra fans…"
8 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"I see a few things to take out of this.
Firstly, the players complaining they are not enjoying it, a portion of Melbourne players mentioned how they are hating football. Now is it because of the rules or because they are losing like never before?…"
10 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I remember when we signed Pezet, one of the journos on NRL360 quizzed Anasta on how much we paid for Pezet, Anasta said we got him ridiculously cheap, my guess is $300 - $350k."
32 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Adam Hayne's discussion Will Penisini Gone
"Some of the points made sit in a bin of self justification....
R&R sits with who again? 
Now Russell looked really good last year and we were all disappointed to lose him to Perth, that doesn't stop the current judgements, but it is handy.
Will…"
33 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I do not believe we would be paying 400k for Pezet.....it was said at the time it was rediculously cheap, my guess 250?
and yes it is a guess because no one other than those that "count" will know the truth, especially not the garbage journalists…"
52 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Adam Hayne's discussion Will Penisini Gone
"two players the Eels have spent years & money retaining & developing into the 'worst centre pairing....hmmm, perhaps not the flex Daz thought it was...he is determined to defend the status quo in head office...just like Hoe
I got a "Mod note" for…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Parra fan on The Hill's discussion Abdo Gonski
"Yeah he did...Cupping Vlandys nuts everyday isn't that confusing"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Parra fan on The Hill's discussion Abdo Gonski
"I like PVL for his innovation...I can't even LB....you do realise that it is Ugly Petes fucking "innovative innovation tinkering" that have made the game so damn....wait....you know this....what the hell dude"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Parra fan on The Hill's discussion Abdo Gonski
"No mention of a poll, he was saying from contacts he has that work for the NRL. He would have people he knows personally that he talks to."
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"I think something that isn't mentioned is momentum swings these 2 players can swing momentum with there involvement alone they also free up other players also with the attention they no doubt garner.
These mentioned things can be had in attack or…"
2 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Adam Hayne's discussion Will Penisini Gone
"So Daz, your attack on posters with criticisms of R&R is identifying quite a few Eels players - who have been recruited or retained by the Eels - as amongst the worst in the league for contribution to their team?
And your closing statement is by…"
2 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I see it very similar to you, LB.
When you have a roster hole that needs filling, you fill it with the best available player you can - of course with due diligence on them as a player / person.
Not big on blocking paths for juniors unless they are…"
2 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>