Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

HKF replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"That's probably spot on, $500-$600k is a bit of wishful thinking on my part."
15 minutes ago
Gucci replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"Agreed. People need to remember there is no one on the market for 2027 anyways. Signing Junior on $650K when there isnt anyone else to get doesnt mean anything. We dont get bonuses for not using our cap space.
Its laughable that everyone needs to be…"
29 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"HKF - sounds about right. I thought he'd command $650k minimum, considering he is on $900 -$950K for his last year, and a co captain."
53 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"Pops i like these comments, in all honesty i don't know how you price him considering his age, and the fact he is co captain and he is on a very high salary right now. 
 "
54 minutes ago
Yehez replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"One more season in 2027 for Junioir at less than 500 I think would be awesome. "
1 hour ago
Yehez replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"I am not sure why people are desperate for signings here. 
By all means we are going for Keoan it seems. Only someone like him or the likes of Haas/Tino can really add to our forwards. 
We need a backup at the backs but those can be signed anytime…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"As long as it's at a discount no issues, he's a cornerstone of the club "
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"It's about supply and demand. TDS is young and expected to get better every year, at a key spine position. There was huge demand for him. How many clubs would expect Paulo to still be NRL material at the end of 2026? He is 33 next year."
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Randy and Poppa. Just to simply the message a little. 1. This is the situation we are in. The fact we are means that the most likely scenario is we will sign a first grader.2.  Relative to their impact on the cap, meaning they need to be outplaying…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"mongolian trotting duck These are the type of issues that you cannot put a value on, number of young forwards coming through and junior is the one they will be looking up to. Leadership is not always tangible in a monetary sense.
 "
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"But we have people on here that think we paid 700k for TDS.....hate to go shopping with you lot!"
1 hour ago
HKF replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"He is already under contract for 2026 so one more year after that. His current contract is reportedly $900-$950k so he would have to take a pay cut to continue but the numbers some on here are tossing up like $300-$400k are laughable.  Sure that's…"
1 hour ago
GM replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"That's well and good, a little disheartening wr have added  FA in regards to new players "
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Well that was nearly "ballistic" glad it was not me who said that.....
Your right by the way!
Dynasty should look up the pay scales, I don't think there is anything below 125K in the top 30 game, even that maybe higher this year?"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"I am of the view Bluey, that the powers to be will work it out in a mutual discussion with Junior by asking him what he believes is appropriate. I would not like to be sitting down with him giving him ultimatum's. the respect we owe him is not…"
2 hours ago
shane replied to LB's discussion Parramatta open talks with Junior Paulo over extension
"1 yr at the most and 400K max.Every year when his cantract is up for renewal he plays well, after signing a new 1 for2 or more yrs he doesn't perform until the yr before renewal. last contract signed for 4yrs at 950 K and took untill this yr to…"
2 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>