Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

SuperEel 22 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club
"It's in that same email, just scroll down and you'll have the link with your voting pin. List of petitioning members is here: https://www.parraleagues.com.au/wp-content/uploads/List-of-Petition...
Spags and Libertini are both on there.
 "
4 minutes ago
Muttman replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club
"Super I got an email from the Leagues Club saying that voting was open, however I haven't recieved any email with the voting portal link. Any idea when that will be sent?
Also, apparently the names of members who petitioned for the special…"
20 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Clintorian's discussion Is Toby Rudolph worth chasing?
"Yeah, this is purely for 2027 onwards and specifically Junior's prop role if/when he retires.I think we're one alpha short in the middle personally, and yet to see if Maetele will kick on in first grade."
21 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Well done Daz, those without media training wouldn't pick up on the subtle jabs here."
25 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Clintorian's discussion Is Toby Rudolph worth chasing?
"Isn't the question about someone like Rudolph is where does he fit, say from 2027 onwards?
In 2026 the Eels are listing as props: Paulo, Tuivati, Moretti and Maetele.
Locks (also middle) are: Walker, Hopgoode, De Bellin
Listed 2nd rowers are:…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22’s discussion was featured
Returning like the bad smell he is, Roy Spagnolo is once again attempting to undermine the club.
His latest attempt involves 4 Special Resolutions tabled at the upcoming AGM to undo many of the positive governance changes resulting from the ILGA…
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Nicely unpacked Daz. They are throwing punches at us from behind a curtain. Burn the curtain
It's subtle and boxing clever.  They are losing the PR war and they have no real leg to stand on, no way to right the ship so they softly try to invert the…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"We would only need 300k as he would leave mid-season due to pregnancy or whatever....it's kind of his thing"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
" Is it just me or is this ABC article doing its sly best to invert the David and Goliath character of this battle? In this story, we all know the Eels are David and the Storm are Goliath. The Storm have been in the finals for all but about 2-3 times…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"So you can appeal a state Supreme court decision now? 
To who?"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"No time to play pool when Ninja's are about.
I have seen a bloke get a star stuck in his head...it's not as bad as it looks and can leave you in better condition than a pool ball from 10ft"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"It would NOT be subjudice for Vlandys to state that they consider a contract, which they registered, binding sans a court intervention...thats a furphy
 "
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"I would hire a guy that is just as big...ummm.errr..The call to your mate may be cut short by the ashtray's arrival.
V'handys wants WWE. Lets give him a show. Drag him into the ring and hit him with a fucking chair till he goes tits-up.
Hoe…"
2 hours ago
Acme replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Do you mean 2027? Or are you just defiantly holding your ground 😁"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Lomax will burn your toast and NRL will smear the crud mess through our butter.
I hate toast scrunge in my butter"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"LOL Rudolph (haven't receded to Randick yet) how about a NINJA with 10 razor edged ashtrays and a bowl of hot soup!"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1997

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 280

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>