Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Entire cowboys back line is better than these two. They are signing them as cover. "
3 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I'd suggest Milky and Tago as instant improvements and without a word of a lie it couldn't happen quick enough if we are in competition with others the odds are dropping by the minute.
I'd be shocked if Farnworth or any other elite player is looked…"
32 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Simonsson was already signed long term before that so Ryles had a plan for him. So makes sense just keeping him. 
Issue is why complain about not signing Katoa or Ramien? They are fine and are slightly better than what we have but there are options…"
40 minutes ago
Joel K replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Lomax was a top 3 winger in the comp, I was never expecting a 1:1 replacement and I would've accepted Sami, Katoa or Cobbo.
its just the fact that we we ended up taking the easy option in bringing Simonsson back who had a cry and requested a release…"
49 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"Not an intelligent response overall but "like your dementia" was funny and witty.
Now I have figured out that Mr Vlandy/s problem in your eyes is that he is "ugly" .....and I am the excitable child???
I don't squeal (defintely not with glee) unless…"
50 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"woof"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I haven't heard much about Leniu coming here. Thought he was committed to PNG. But who knows who we are after. Tom Jenkins had rumours around that he was coming to Parramatta, he is off-contract and there is absolutley nothing about him leaving or…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Adam Hayne's discussion Will Penisini Gone
"Daz, you missed my point, I was if anything mitigating the R&R not defending the actual players.
I can be equally disparaging of our players, but that was not an objective in my responses."
1 hour ago
Clayton replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"As the late Jack Gibson said, only bet on those who can't feed themselves. Doesn't leave much other than horses and greyhounds. "
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I think the club is more invested in trying to lock Burton and Spencer up before that can move to getting a centre could be young/star for whatever is I don't mind."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Adam Hayne's discussion Will Penisini Gone
"Poppa, the players identified in our centres and backrow just appear on that worst of the worst list re: player contribution. The data is the data. On the RLET he does give a caveat that bottom performing contributors can be the victim of problems…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"How can Kelly be when he was not bought to start. Originally it was a back 5 of Iongi, Simonsson, Penisini, Russell and Fox. Without injuries he ain't starting."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Two months notice? They told Taulagi at the end of last year they weren't renewing him and Drinkwater nearly went to Dogs at start of the year. The talk of Purdue going to 1 started with his negotiations end of last year. 
They weren't given sudden…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Gun backline? They are losing Drinkwater and Taulagi.  Signing 2 30 year olds, Katoa was on verge of getting dropped for Muliatlo before getting hurt. 
Yeah they are signing players but come on you really think Ramien and/or Katoa are players that…"
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Daley “Moses injury is so minor he could probably play for Parra this weekend”
"I reckon NSW will lose, wet weather conditions. Ponga and Hammer to dominate with Grant in the ruck."
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Ummmm, Brian Kelly is Lomax's replacement. He's obviously a piss poor replacement but he is it."
1 hour ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>