Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Goyoueels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Are the NRL really saying they will intervene?
Seems to me that once Lomax's other manager took over from Schifcofske, the narrative changed to "poor Lomax, Melbourne are ok, best for the game to let him back in, no harm done, Parra will be…"
27 seconds ago
Longfin Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"The rest is in a paper bag left by the cleaner in his locker..."
21 minutes ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Good to hear that and Im sure most nrl  fans would be the same thanks. You are 100% right! Eels absolutely need to use this back up emphatically! It's not very often  it happens where clubs support others at all. Cash in on it Eels!
its unbelievable…"
22 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"I'd like to know how they calculated the 200k figure. Seems very random and not built on anything factual."
31 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"I have said for years that the NRL don't want a strong Parramatta club. We have a big pull of interest regardless of how we are performing on the field, so the NRL don't really benefit by putting their efforts behind us. The NRL wants to retain the…"
33 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Does anyone remember this?
"Oh HOE   I love this. Just shows the hypocrisy and the look after ourselves only mentality. Just look at that timeline.
You could possible add these as well.
Melbourne Storm maintains a strict policy to ensure they are not competitively…"
40 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Problem is Manu is basically signed and sealed to the roosters he wouldn't come to us.If we are being really unrealistic let's give them Lomax this year for the rights to Munster 27 onwards.
Now there's a deal we lose Pezet in 27 so it works out…"
1 hour ago
KENDOZA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Don't be suprised if the nrl hits us with a fine for not tsking the 200k 🤣🤣🤣"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Yet we don't need money for the club in general. We are a rich club. We don't need money.
A club like Manly would froth over the $200k."
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Maybe the NRL will be as good as the US has been in brokering a deal between UKR & RUS.
Hold firm Jim! Take em nowhere, give em nothing and then bring em home early."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"If we get that we've been royally farked.
What we have to realise and thank fark Jim does cash and a mid tier talent isn't a good trade for us.What does Blore and cash do for a club that struggles to attract top tier talent.
Talent is the key for us…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Shark Attack..... Moses told to be wary of the surf!
"I must admit its hard for us old folks, they don't make dolls like they used......gawd I cannot see the area where you put the hose in?
Its time's like this we need a couple of oldies but goodies!"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"You don't want the nrl as a mediator you just don't I feel if they get to involved in this a negotiation between 2 clubs what's to stop them from doing it again down the track.IMO we'll lose out badly if the nrl deem what is fair and what isn't.I…"
2 hours ago
Eels tragic replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Now we're talkin'! "
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"NRL wants to negotiate a deal now. Ok Melbourne can have Lomax but we want to sign Joseph Manu for 1.2million with 700k cap exemption"
3 hours ago
iamnot replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Yes - the whole junior development system should be centralised to the NRL itself, funding included which all clubs must contribute an equal amount into to hold their licence. Make a whole standalone division that does nothing else but junior…"
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1935

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 243

 

Does anyone remember this?

Storm seek compensation for early release of Josh Addo-Carr in form of like for like player swap or transfer fee Source: www.nrl.com news;   By Dan Walsh Fri 20 Dec 2019, 05:08 PM  Melbourne are prepared to release representative star Josh Addo-Carr…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Blue Eel 40 minutes ago
Views: 196

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>