Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

JC replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"It's a contract that the player isn't locked into but the club is,  so yes, from the players perspective he is off contract but from the clubs perspective they are locked into a contract.  A bad situation for a club to be in because it's a lose,…"
32 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Hector Bob Down's discussion Is the Game getting to fast with all the changes
"Im an old fart  "Hector Bob Down" but I agree ...not only is the game structurally fucked the rules are ruining RUGBY LEAGUE....but I get it times change and maybe the game now is the most lucrative ..........fans , ratings etc...means more MONEY…"
52 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"Milky! Im defo on board .....no disrespect....... Thomas is a great player ......."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"NOS, I agree DB leaving was a failure to adequately secure a position (5/8). The player options were bad ideas but it's also true DB did not reciprocate the faith and trust placed in him. 
Good find above. I stand by it. We know I didn't say he was…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"Who remembers the constant refrain on 1EE that the club is hopeless because they pay overs? My bet is the same folks who played worlds greatest contract and cap manager in lampooning the club for paying overs, are now hoping we buy their sincerity…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"Though if you are to overpay it's for players that can make more of a difference. Keaon I didn't mind paying slight overs for as middles are so important today. But you also do not want to go too over the top as it puts your cap out of wrack and you…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"But he hasn't in open age if at all. All well and good playing it at school, we are not in the place to start trialling him at 6 anytime soon. He would be coming to play Centre/Wing. No extra value, Parra aren't going to offer an extra $100k cause…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"Poupou, you are talking yourself in circles.
1) The RLPA definition defines player options as NOT part of the terms of the contract. 2) Brown's player options were options for him to leave and/or ask for more money. Literally. 3) Browns contract…"
2 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"Love that quote LB. 
I'm over buying clubs leftovers when we miss our first choice targets, though.
Lets put this into perspective.
Last 5 years we have made the top 4 once.
Last 10 years we have made the top 4, 3 times
Last 15 years we have made…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"How is it when we have Iongi signed til 2030? There is no way around the fact he is the future.
As long as you have teams having spots open that offer more money you'll have players looking for a path to play where they want."
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (Anzac Round)
"The 38 points the Eels scored against the Dogs was the most any team has scored against the Dogs. Same as the 20 the Eels scored against the Panthers was the most Panthers conceded up yo that Round 4. 
Vs Manly if will come down to defense. Stop…"
2 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Muttman's discussion Apa Twidle signs with the Bears
"He's off contract until/if he activates the player option. The PO only comes into play if he takes it up, as the RLPA statement makes clear. It's not an option to leave or speak to other clubs. That's a given, because the player is off contract. The…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"But we shouldn't be stupid and pay too much over."
2 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"Forget about Moses' prime. We need a solution that is sustainable year in year out.
Agreed on young players needing to knock the door down. With only one Origin quality player, any position is up for grabs if the player is good enough. If they…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"Richard Penisini and Nanva, that's it.. Developing centers and wingers are our biggest weakness."
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Clintorian's discussion Jenkins to the Eels?
"I think the blocking paths bit is a bit of an over used term to be fair.
Unless you are an aspiring Halfback or Fullback I think pretty much whomever we bring in you have to see it as a challenge to unseat the potential starter that's what we really…"
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2367

 

Jenkins to the Eels?

Some early Friday morning scuttlebutt on Facebook saying Eels have made an offer to sign Thomas Jenkins from the Panthers. I really have no idea if this is true or the validity behind the rumours, but this is a signing I can definitely get behind.…

Read more…
75 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg 1 hour ago
Views: 2062

Araz Nanva signs Top 30 Contract for 2027

The Parramatta Eels are pleased to announce that emerging outside back Araz Nanva has extended his contract with the club for a further year and will be elevated to the Top 30 squad for the 2027 NRL season.An Eels junior, Nanva’s extension comes on…

Read more…
42 Replies · Reply by EA 14 hours ago
Views: 1415

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>