Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Muttman replied to Nitram's discussion How do we field a competitive side based on our top 30?
"We have 2 open spots and Matterson. That's 3 players we don't have. We could use 3 NRL quality players right now. Once again the R&R showing their quality. I'm sure they'll have plenty of excuses. We're not interested in winning comps. We're just…"
21 seconds ago
Richard Jackson replied to Prof. Daz's discussion GAME DAY BLOG, R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial (FINAL TEAMS IN; JDB & TWIDLE ON BENCH)
"The constant concern over Mitches groin convinces me that is the reason why he hasn't been able to practice his kicking action He and Lomax both lost their ability to kick at about the same time during last years Origin.
But now they can call on…"
3 minutes ago
EA replied to Prof. Daz's discussion GAME DAY BLOG, R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial (FINAL TEAMS IN; JDB & TWIDLE ON BENCH)
"The refs do influence the penalty, error and possesion count. If they rightly call the KPP strip, the obstruction, williams incident, the 2 blatant knock ons by the tigers winger, and all the other shit calls what do you think happens? Tigers get…"
5 minutes ago
Who Cares replied to Nitram's discussion How do we field a competitive side based on our top 30?
"Volkman will be 6 Twidle will be the other wing Papa at fullback"
8 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Prof. Daz's discussion GAME DAY BLOG, R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial (FINAL TEAMS IN; JDB & TWIDLE ON BENCH)
"We lost basically every single stat apart from tries scored and two of those tries were during the sin bin (Apa is a bloody hero though!).
We lost:

Posession 
Completion 
Metres
PCM
Misses tackles
Errors
Penalties 
Offloads

We were not the better…"
13 minutes ago
Eels95 replied to Nitram's discussion How do we field a competitive side based on our top 30?
"There are holes in our roster no doubt and that is something that needs to be addressed but any team with this many injuries is going to  struggle to field an nrl team? Even Penrith, the best team in the comp.  
You take out Edwards, Jenkins,…"
16 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Nitram's discussion How do we field a competitive side based on our top 30?
"There's no silver lining to some of these injuries I know, but, it might force the Eels into negotiating more aggressively for recruits.
Or, we'll use injuries to justify results, masking over the issues most saw in pre season, as we did in 2024.
 
 "
17 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Nitram's discussion How do we field a competitive side based on our top 30?
"Gawd devastating stuff :(
BnG doll been on the end of some massive pin pricks this year  :(
 "
17 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Prof. Daz's discussion GAME DAY BLOG, R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial (FINAL TEAMS IN; JDB & TWIDLE ON BENCH)
"Why indeed. Mitchell hasn't kicked a goal from the sideline since last years origin.
While Apa can convert from out wide. That decison amazed me as the coach should have known of Twidles kicking record."
17 minutes ago
LB replied to Prof. Daz's discussion GAME DAY BLOG, R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial (FINAL TEAMS IN; JDB & TWIDLE ON BENCH)
"They will believe their own hype, the fans are. They will crash down in middle of the year as they always do. "
19 minutes ago
LB replied to Prof. Daz's discussion GAME DAY BLOG, R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial (FINAL TEAMS IN; JDB & TWIDLE ON BENCH)
"Missed tackles is a dead stat. Penrith had 44 missed tackles v the Roosters and won 44-4. Now i know it is Penrith but still i feel missed tackles is a stat that is flimsy now."
20 minutes ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion That’s 3 long term injuries because of foul play.
"Another area of concern is Hooker. We have nothing behind Da Silva. If Smith is out, can Da Silva play full 80? Doubt it, we need another Hooker."
21 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack ! replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Apa Twidle - the next Tedesco
"Yes exactly "
21 minutes ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion That’s 3 long term injuries because of foul play.
"I still stand by what we did though. The fact the NRL do that is fraud pretty much as they should be neutral."
22 minutes ago
LB replied to Nitram's discussion How do we field a competitive side based on our top 30?
"This is where we need a loan deal at least just to cover until Samrani is back in Round 9 then we have him at least to play Wing.
There are players in Cup who can do a job for now; James Schiller, Alofiana Khan-Pereira, Mark Asomua, Tyrell Sloan,…"
23 minutes ago
Eels95 replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion That’s 3 long term injuries because of foul play.
"The fight from the boys was unbelievable.  To play 50 odd minutes with no recognised centre. Basically  half a game with a hooker at 5/8 and 25 minutes with no right winger or right centre.
The effort deserved some points. Some key mistakes from…"
23 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2275

 

Credit to Ryley Smith

Maybe its a reflection on Pezet but we looked better with Ryley at 6 and Mitch went into the game a bit more. Smith looked Gassed when he was coming off and had got a bit of treatment before and was back on very quickly and was solid obviously hes…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Joel K 45 minutes ago
Views: 147

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>