Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"Could a MON Voodoo doll be a possibility? Does Chief engage in witchcraft by any chance?"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"In terms of Talking Parra. I would take that with a grain of salt at the moment. Primarily due to both those two parties having a fall out months ago. One side carried on about not having access anymore, on April fools day made a joke saying "We…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Well PF how do we know another club didn't want them? Maybe no other club or maybe one other wanted Jenkins? You gonna say no thanks?
But in terms of elite, well not sure that is going to happen. Maybe one might come available later but rarely does…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Ok few things. I do not really agree the defence as a whole is better than BA's at this stage. I mean this year we are setting records. Before you say injuries we conceded 86 points in first fortnight. Also, saying the roster that MON has given him…"
1 hour ago
Michael W. replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"Chief, your obsession with MON is consuming you. You eat, sleep, drink and probably masturbate to MON. You probably have a room filled with MON memorabilia, and a pentagram, or in your case a MONagram, just so you can try and do some weird shit with…"
2 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"Mate don't forget Captain Ben Roger's too."
3 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"They better be elite, if they another club doesn't want them type im gonna go ahead and sit myself out for the 27 season."
3 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"We'll see if they can get more signings over the line. In just going off what's happened previously. "
3 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"*2025"
3 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"I'm hoping Chiefy that some of the suggestions can hit the mark. For one the club must return to being open and transparent. Admit failings and improve them on the same token Celebrate the wins in recruitment and shout them loud and proud.…"
4 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"LB, I don't really want to get into who to sign , who to keep. I'm more trying to attack it from the angle, If Ryles wants them in the first place, then I trust that judgement. My concern is and has been are we able to sign whom has been identified…"
4 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"And that's what we need Parraboy. To improve the roster, to put to bed (my thoughts on missing targets) and to shut us fans up. All of us would love nothing more, would be my guess. I'm hoping your right."
4 hours ago
Parraboy replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"no shoot and hope. 
youz will be happy, trust me
it's about time "
4 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Brown will.be better but im unsure what the issue is. When.i saw Brown.in.pre season,  he was training the house down and beating guys like Tuivaiti in the runs. I haven't seen what's been happening in reserve grade. 
Ryles proved last year what he…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Chief, can i please ask as i am curious and not being smart. What is it about Ryles that you support so highly compared to BA who you despised?
You mention debuting Pryke and Mataele, referring to if that is the best we have that is pathetic. Well…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Right, so Jason Ryles doesn't care either since he hired the trainer?"
4 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 223

 

Should we be concerned !

As we head into June and not far off the middle of the season, attentions really begin to look at 2027 rosters across the NRL.So far the club has signed a very good talent in Jayd'n Sua. He has played 6 origin games for Queensland (last in 2024) and…

Read more…
19 Replies · Reply by LB 1 hour ago
Views: 256

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>