Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"In fairness, I've been guilty of poor conduct in the past. I'm now making a point of not doing that anymore."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"HOE, it's possible for attacks on ideas to be attacks on people. It can be a fine line. But we can test the line. The test is to ask if the premise of an attack relates to some aspect of the identity of a person making a claim, or to the…"
2 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Couldn't agree more Daz. 
Not wanting to make it sound political, but, this is what the "right wing" / "real Australians" / "non-politically correct" / "anti-woke" crowd carry on with. They shit can everyone they don't agree with and when they get…"
2 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"On the topic of moderation, there's something I think needs to be absolutely spelled out.
In a perfect world, we wouldn't need moderation because we would all be responsbile enough to engage in robust debat, sometimes quite vigorous debate, possibly…"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Bourbon Man, I'll go even further than you. Way before Covid, because I've been on 1EE for decades, it became absolutely impossible to keep track of the very personal attacks on me. Now, apparently, because I have stated clearly that I don't think…"
2 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Daz, appreciate the response mate and you expressing your position.
I still would like to understand why NOS claims you launched "very personal attacks" at Muttman.
Muttman and you both definitely vigorously debated/argued (as above).
No doubt,…"
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, I received a message from HOE, noting you had made this accusation I see above. HOE was clearly suggesting I should address it and if I had made a "very personal attack" upon Muttman (as accused) then I would be held to account. 
I replied that…"
3 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, before we get onto all the questions and claims you've raised, one by one, please let's start with your claims of Daz's "very personal attacks" on Muttman. 
You may be completly correct, but please provide evidence supporting this claim.
 
 "
3 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, Muttman and I have been members of this forum for the better part of 20 years. 
I completely respect him and often compliment his considered judgment. 
On one occasion, out of frustration, I reacted to his regime of agendered negative…"
3 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"TolElls, Set up a new Averillo blog if you want to discuss it. I'm not going to reopen a blog closed by moderation. Hopefully, people keep it relatively civil (as much as possible) or drift horribly off topic and it will stay open and no posts will…"
4 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Well if those above JRcant get the players he needs, what choice does he have, he needs to have 30 players. "
4 hours ago
Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Wtf, which blog was this in?"
5 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Hey HOE,
I have a question.
So, Daz & a few others attacked Muttman with very personal attacks a few weeks back, he has since left the site which is a massive loss.
For some reason, those attacks from Daz, Bourban Man and others seemed to slip…"
6 hours ago
TolEllts replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Admins, Why can't we reply to Averillo blog? What bad will it do the forum of the Eels executives and R&R team if Eels fans are venting their frustrations about the recruitment which unfortunately are contributing to the bad results in the field.…"
6 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
""
6 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"At the same time he still has a percentage to meet in terms of how much the cap needs to be spent whether he likes it or not.
So if it is like "This player wants $400k and we have $900k available" well he has to spend that money anyway.
So the issue…"
7 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 241

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>