Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Michael W. replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"Yet the experts see a different Stephano. They say he is the only forward who can hold his head up high, and from the Storm games I've watched, the experts are right. It just goes to show the difference of an opinion between someone who has played…"
40 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"That is just a flawed argument BE. "
57 minutes ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"His body and playing style is much more suited to Union . Even then he's probably not wallaby level because his skill set isn't well rounded .  I'd love to have the ability to sit down and cut up every try we've conceded Will has been involved in a…"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Learn something new every day, Poppa. So you're gonna build a huge right deltoid muscle and look like Popeye leaning over?"
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"The post above does not refer to "agenda", Muttman. Maybe another said it. Stick to what is said. I explained what was meant by cherry picking. It's not just picking out instances, it's the inconsistencies in evaluation that follow and the tendency…"
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Blue Eel, I posted a sample of the receipts. It was a few saying "pay overs". Including one who denied they said it so I posted the receipt of them saying it.
This is part of what is annoying some of us here. Half-baked "club is terrible" Statler…"
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Captain, if I applied the same logic to MON as you aplied to Gould, I would start out talking about what MON did right when the Eels were in the finals 2019-2022, and then I would proceed to the period when the Eels have not been in the finals…"
3 hours ago
Joel K replied to jamie's discussion Ryles the Super Coach
"Tuivaiti would be the best from that 2023 side
I don't really get the hype on Guymer, he gets folded in the backrow"
4 hours ago
Joel K replied to Aracom's discussion Parra 2027 2028 2029
"Winning starts in the front office
And our front office is 🗑️. "
4 hours ago
EA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Yea long term I rate the other three. But it's also because I rate the other 3 very highly. Visconti has really impressed me. We shall see how they go as it's still early in the season for them "
4 hours ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Do Parramatta sign him - Luai to become a free agent 27 , then Chiefs 2028
"Yep they need cup time. Hopefully very soon"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Do Parramatta sign him - Luai to become a free agent 27 , then Chiefs 2028
"Surely playing either off the bench for 20mins or so would only help their development."
4 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"I more so meant in the future. This year yeah it makes sense as he is 21, he is older than those three mentioned so therefore he would be pushing FG more than the three mentioned. But long term they would jump Visconti i guess."
4 hours ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Do Parramatta sign him - Luai to become a free agent 27 , then Chiefs 2028
"Not sure what they are waiting for. Coinakis is a big body and strong defender. Luke and Smitz are RM players. Coinkis and Hudson don't deserve to be sharing minutes in JF either. They are better than that. They compliment each other well to.…"
5 hours ago
EA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Definitely. As it currently stands, Visconti deserves to be in front of those 3 in the pecking order in NSW Cup. Popo has only played rd 1 this year. No idea what injury he has and when he is returning. The other 3 probably have more upside than…"
5 hours ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Do Parramatta sign him - Luai to become a free agent 27 , then Chiefs 2028
"Yep your right. The club need to ensure they retain the right players because we cannot keep everyone. I felt they made the right decisons last year in which 21 years old they let go since they are not JF eligble anymore. In the list I put below,…"
5 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2375

 

Parra 2027 2028 2029

Our ceiling is prtty limited for these yearsWhat can we really do next year?Not muchEven with a full squad sideEven with Seal Russell leaving (a big big up)Even with One signing8th would be over performing for 2027.Ryles will be either signed or…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by Joel K 4 hours ago
Views: 158

Thirteeen Minutes

Trauma snowballing syndrome and the urge to blow things up isn’t just something buried in human DNA. It's now rebranded as “high standards". Forty Years can do that. Sometimes, all it takes is a few minutes. But let’s park the emotion for a minute.…

Read more…
70 Replies · Reply by Prof. Daz 3 hours ago
Views: 1077

Centres

We without a doubt have the worst centre pairing in the comp . You can look through every other side - neither of our centres would get a start in any of them . It's an area we have neglected in both recruitment and development. We have a rep level…

Read more…
40 Replies · Reply by Michael W. 40 minutes ago
Views: 1051

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>