Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Kurupt - 1 Year Cuck replied to LB's discussion Max Popo extends til 2028
"Lol there he is Mr Popo"
3 hours ago
BringBackSemi replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Was a big Lomax fan but how he has conducted himself is a massive letdown. The guy has shown a complete lack of integrity and intelligence. Why would the Storm want this kind of person at their club (other than Bellamy going all out in his final…"
5 hours ago
fishbulb replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"He'll be super sad if he doesn't a contract with them?"
6 hours ago
fishbulb replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"A Yogo and not a Yogo 2? Bloody MON, no wonder NAS turned us down."
6 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Never mind strong arming us...If NRL don't come down hard on our side then all of their tough talk is exposed as so much hot air"
7 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion The bad smell of Parramatta returns
", including reversing the member resolution passed at last year’s AGM regarding “fit and proper” individuals.....because scumbags."
7 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Can't say I appreciate you saying that maybe I need a suspension..ruh-roh....and here I thought we were getting on so spiffingly But then you decide to go squealing about me above my head and so back to square one we go...square 2 maybe, whatever, I…"
7 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Better than that, include penalties for breaking contracts in all player contracts and ensure both players and Agents pay a price. That will then at least make players second guess running out on a club."
8 hours ago
Bear replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Must be getting close to the seasons start.....rumours of old parra factions causing ripples, lomax rumours by the hundred, and huge overs rumours for NAS, click bait galore. Stop the shit get the season under way already. GET  IT ON , yeehaa"
8 hours ago
ParraEels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"That's a cop out.
No trade has been restricted. He can play anything and anywhere other than NRL. He signed the terms of his release as he saw it benefited himself. Now that he can see what everyone with a brain was saying to begin with and he came…"
9 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Money as in on the cap?"
9 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Based on what? Hearing from many within the game he has no legs to stand on, including lawyers saying so too. Only way we end up with nothing i believe is NRL saying to us just give him to them and strong arming us which i doubt they care to do."
9 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"Well Shane Gillis was on Kent podcast and i understand he would say professional things but god he talks a lot of shit. Supporting Clinton and Lomax."
9 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"Just going off the report, didn't say NAS said that. I said he admitted offer from Warriors, should have reworded that it was mentioned a $800k offer."
9 hours ago
Acme replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"So, in a matter of weeks, he's gone from having multiple options available (R360, Japanese Rugby, The Force, MMA), to being restrained from trade so badly that it's affecting his mental health. Utter bullshit.
He's stitched himself up by leaving one…"
9 hours ago
will replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"nas,  papenhauzen and lomax are all schifofske managed,  there are a lot of issues there"
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Friday
Views: 1914

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 223

 

NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta

Nelson Asofa-Solomona admits offers from the Warriors and also reports are he had an $800k offer from Parramatta. Not sure how long the deal was and whether 100% true. But if it is, why offer that much and it seems they are desperate to get a middle…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by fishbulb 6 hours ago
Views: 389

Make your own rules.

All this talk of the NRL changing rules and wanting to add this and that. Stuff let us decide what rules we should do.What are some rules you would love to see the NRL incorporate, they can be serious or dumb ones i do not care this blog is for a…

Read more…
10 Replies · Reply by Michael W. 10 hours ago
Views: 156

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>