Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Joeyboyz replied to The Ghost of Danny Crnkovich's discussion Eels podcasts
"I like TCT, but it's a very hard listen without nodding off. Those 2 are boring personalities."
2 hours ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Not according to them."
4 hours ago
EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Anyone see Simmo in an interview. He tore his hamstring off the bone just prior to pre season starting. So he never had an nrl pre season this year and only returned to training just before the sharks trial game. This bloke is so injury prone now.…"
4 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"It might hit news once 1 of the factions trying to destroy the club get involved.  We know too well some factions have buddies in the media who will let them attack the club any way they can.
If it does talking Parra won't be mentioned and he will…"
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Why was he around the players that long to spread so much negativity. "
4 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"That is how podcast and YouTube wanna be's build subscribers.  They cause drama, talk about the drama, go on other shows causing more drama and engagement increases.
It doesn't matter if someone had a go at them earlier if they can get attention out…"
4 hours ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Poor bugger might need to spend some time away from the game and reconsider his priorities in life."
5 hours ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"How does he act at games? I have heard anything of that nature? Not saying it's not true either.
It reminds me of a comment that lead singer of Nickelback once said in an interview I heard and always stuck with me after their first hit became global…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Weird thing is he tags Hello Sport yet called them out earlier in the year calling them names as they made a slight post about Troy saying he is leaving the SGA. Hello sport responded "big news out of Parra" in a sarcastic way and Adam had a go at…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"I wouldn't say lose lose. I mean maybe I am seeing this as less than it is but I don't think his following is as big as what many think. Not like this will hit the papers or radio. 
If it does, I will come back here and say I was wrong and surprised…"
5 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"But, Poppa, you might have missed the trap into which my question was leading our R&R experts.
If it's about rich clubs breed success, then either:
A) R&R teams' relation to ontield success is fractured through much broader financial relationships…"
5 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Nothing wrong with critisism but don't expect to be invited to events with players and staff present which is what Captains club offers.  Is he banned from attending games or just the privilegesbthat come with Captains club membership. 
He has been…"
5 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Correct, Poppa. I listed some figures which bring into doubt Chiefy's "fans pay your wages" claim. But we can directly test Chiefy's degree of sincerity. Does Chief think the wages of Politis at Chooks is paid by fans?"
5 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"I've answered that question, Chiefy. I've stated that I don't share your assumption of a 1-to-1 linear relation recruitment/retention to ladder position. Because I disagree with that premise, the burden is not mine to isolate decisions and correlate…"
5 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Looks like he is hoping a show with fans will invite him on to talk and grow his own fan base tagging different shows and podcasts but they won't give him any support as he is no one.
Just another fan who thinks he has insights and knowledge beyond…"
5 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"I think this is a lose lose for the club. Social media is here to stay and any club whether it be the epl or American football are going to face criticism towards players , coaches or the administration. I don't know exactly what happened here and…"
6 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 249

 

RECRUITMENT

Seems like every week there are good quality players coming onto the market or that are available that would add something to our team and roster but we aren't seeming to be as active in the player market as we were earlier this year. EG Keon.…

Read more…
79 Replies · Reply by EA 4 hours ago
Views: 1789

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>