Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Anguillidae replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"I turned it off after the 'Captains Challenge' debacle. It was pretty clear what was happening. We can only imagine what was going through the players minds at that time. 6 again Storm. And another 6 again to the Storm. Fuck off."
24 seconds ago
Desieels replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"I stopped watching after 18-4. I saw the defence was horrendous. We haven't learnt much from the last season. Yes, it is just the first game. In the blink of an eye, we will be in August. A slow start is an inherent issue, and it looks like we…"
31 seconds ago
Hell On Eels replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"From around the 45th minute to the 72nd minute Storm completed 17 sets to our 3 sets. 
The score went from 18-4 to 46-4 in the 66th. Then Simmo was sin-binned.
It's a minor miracle only 6 points were conceded in the last 14 minutes with 12 men.…"
4 minutes ago
The Captain replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"1000% this. As soon as you're gassed you're done. 
Six against and sin bins are death in this current game. Regardless of all other factors if you can't stay disciplined you will get pumped."
10 minutes ago
Seraph replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Hopgood 2 week ban,
"If this is the benchmark for how the Eels are being policed this season, any minor or accidental infringement will be punished to the maximum. Biased or influenced refs maybe, but the MRC is a different beast and while we can fight the charges after…"
15 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"How about our 9s, grant played faster and quicker. By the time Smith or Dasilva got the ball the storms defence was already in our players face hence why we couldn't ball play. We need speed in the play the ball and play shapes. We kept going wide…"
18 minutes ago
The Captain replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"A successful year for us this year was always Top 8. Obviously we always want to dream of a Premiership, but this year is about Top 8 as success.
Now with a points differential of -50 odd after one blooming game we've really made this season hard…"
22 minutes ago
The Captain replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"The last 40 years of history also says you can't win a premiership if you're Parramatta. History is made to be broken. 😁"
24 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Hopgood 2 week ban,
"Moretti and Teecum need to be in the team, they add speed with the play ball same with doorey. Hopgood, Paulo dont add that."
26 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"You poor bastard travelling down to Melbourne to watch that horse shit.
I'd have thought some part of the eels leadership group should have at least apologised for dishing up that.Straight up embarrassing.The officiating wasn't great and I'm not…"
32 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Daz that's classic: "I was at the ground and even Storm fans laughed at some absurd ref decisions."
We kicked for 66m in the first half. When Manly upset the Storm 18-16 last year they kicked for over 850m.
17 - 3 sets completed between the 46th to…"
47 minutes ago
macybrown replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Yep Samrani is a must for next week Russel back to centre hopefully it'll help . Was surprised he was behind Simmo based on trials.
Good only 3-4weeks expected longer. Can't come quick enough.
 "
55 minutes ago
Mr Perpetual Motion replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Hopgood 2 week ban,
"What a fucking joke. 
Admittedly, I am looking at this as an Eels supporter, but what else could Hopgood do in the situation? MacDonald changed angles and stepped into him. 
I want the club to challenge it, even if Hopgood is unsuccessful. This call…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"As Pops said, ladies and gentlemen, you don't need to be Dick Tracy to see what was going on.
From around the 45th to 72nd minute, for almost 30 minutes, the Storm had completed 17 sets to our 3 sets.
The score went from 18-4 at the break to 46-4 by…"
1 hour ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"I think JAC is round 3/4, Mace? So hopefully not too long.
Yeah, the outside back depth is definitely still an issue I hear you.
Maybe Russell to centre & Samrani to wing? Samrani always gives 100% and he does some really good things. Has great…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Hopgood 2 week ban,
"Challenge it. Cleary got his downgraded."
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2162

 

My personal takeaways

Tayln d-Seriously what are we playin this cunt for.Every time he comes on he does the dumbest shit I've ever fucken seen seriously man.Fcken pissed me of.penis and Kelly-Two of the most attroucious defensive centres I've ever seen in my 15 plus…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by EA 3 hours ago
Views: 551

1eE Modern day Eels team: Prop

So anyone want to have a guess of the Halfback chosen? Well surprisingly it was Moses, who would have thought. Now onto Props and this one is the first legit position where i do not know who the two will be. Also, i must clarify, unfortunately i…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 100

Take Aways from the game

Positive Comments:No injuries. All other comments:After the first minute of the game I immediately knew that no matter how good we try to play that we would not win the game. The corruption was pretty clear. But wow we played awful.The sin bin was…

Read more…
82 Replies · Reply by Anguillidae 25 seconds ago
Views: 1579

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>