Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"$300K could help pay for an elite junior to be developed by the Eels over a number of years to be NRL ready and then immediatley poached to another club. mmmmmmmm"
13 minutes ago
Axel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yeah, but one of the women is paying for his divorce LOL"
29 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Zach will eventually get back into the nrl, no one hates him it's just a bigger issue in the game. These contracts are useless and storm trying to benefit from it. Eels need to get proper value in return."
37 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yes Nitram, Nrl do think all fans are stupid suckers...think they showed this couldn't care less attitude to fans,back when they changed NRL GF time slot.
and obviously in their blatantly shown attitude towards this issue re support what is clearly…"
37 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"The answer to your last question is, yes they do & they don't give a toss about the intelligence or viewpoint of fans. 
Thus this pathetic open for all Origin change.  If it ain't broke don't fix it!"
44 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Great point Nitram. Like i used this anology with my mates, like saying a bloke got caught having an affair on his wife with two women. His wife took the kids and left him. Then have his mates come out and say "He's a great bloke and did all these…"
45 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Im not surprised that mental health issues were raised in relation to Lomax, but Im very much astounded that it was raised not by zacs manager or by some alias on line reporter, but V’landys (whom supposedly should be a neutral party in this).…"
46 minutes ago
Nitram replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Exactly my point. Just because you are sad doesnt mean you should not suffer the consequences. Our society functions because of repercussions regardless of how they make us feel. If not then the world quickly becomes a lawless free for all.
This…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Yeah nobody is actually saying Lomax is a terrible person. He is making bad choices and the choice to try and pressure Parra to release him is not a great move. Great people can do some bad things, that is human nature.
What irked me the most from…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"That the Eels are being jelly-haters"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"This Ugly Pete tale of "hospital Lomax" just shows how far down in the weeds he is.
He is saying it is okay for him to be biased as long as he knows or likes you. Isn't this the problem?
With this drivel he is simply highlighting why "he gots to…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"I crashed my car a few years back. It was my fault, and that made me sad."
1 hour ago
Anguillidae replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"PVL playing the mental health card to suit his narrative. What's next from this complete charlatan?"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Yeah Adam, and not from some NRL psychologist. Independent clinical assessment pls"
2 hours ago
Axel replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"There are many players at every club who give up a lot of their time to call on hospitals and visit sick fans. These stories are not always brought to the public. Good on Zac to give up some of his time for that sick kid, but he's one of many…"
2 hours ago
MattL replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Yep, they like to blame the reaction rather than own their action that kicked it all off."
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2075

 

V'Landys on Hello Sport

Happy Monday, if anyone wants a good laugh to start their week, skip to 32:50 mark and listen to this f***wit talk. It is laughable seriously. Claiming the offer of $300k was a great deal and we can put that into our junior system. But said we can…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by Blue Eel 13 minutes ago
Views: 490

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>