Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

ParramattaLurker replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Thats probably a good thing to hear we are stopping leaking from our own 4 walls. Has happened way too often over the years.
 
Hopefully something is in the works "
6 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"I don't have anything that I'm across. However, the club doesn't leak signing information. So anything that hits the papers is being leaked by the player or their manager."
12 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"I have a manual 6 spd Corolla and it's my daily for the last 10 years it's what every child and  grand child has and will learn how to drive in.Onething I'll say Toyota know how to engineer cars for purpose and a Corolla as a daily and a manual one…"
28 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Adam, I truly didn't get the Toyota comments. Like outside of saying BMW drivers drive like they're entitled to something, and giant Ute drivers are just plain annoying, both of which are factual and well-proven hypotheses, how does anyone's…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Chiefy, I didn't raise the moderation issue. It was thrown at me even though I'm not a mod. Can you imagine me moderating. I would ban you first, for misspelling Cheefy as Chiefy and for hinting that a wide mustache is cool. I mean obviously that…"
1 hour ago
Davos Seaworth replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"Cannot tackle "
1 hour ago
Davos Seaworth replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"So you just want ordinary players and young guys that Nathan Brown and a rookie coach can "develop". Stephen Kearny tried this approach. How'd that work out? It lead to a 10 year rebuilding that culminated in one prelim final and a GF. 
Try harder. …"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Spot on, Bourbs. The ultimate solution to disliking external moderation is to self moderate. We would then have more scope in discussions because they would not costantly spill over into personal invective. I don't agree with the pining for the…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Hi NOS, I appreciate you retracting the claim. As noted, I take personal attacks seriously and would not have attacked Muttman or others in that way. 
For clarity sake, I am unaware of blogs closed for anything to do with comments toward me. I have…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Daz, can we please get back to the main topic,  and thats the sackings of Sarantinos,  O'neill and the recruitment manager, and stop worrying about moderation.  The moderation has never been better apart from a few blog closures which I didn't agree…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Mallee57's discussion Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs
"Ciraldo has been doing that for weeks now. He's under pressure and he's resorting to blaming refs to try to get pressure off himself."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"BM, snowflake is right in this context. The interesting thing there is that it's possibly the new moderation standards have created more space for perceived personal attacks. Via a weird inversion. Those of us who tried to actually debate via…"
1 hour ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Bourbs,
I completely agree with everything you have said, and I am sorry to mention this example and yours & Daz’s name personally. Thankyou for replying and accepting the comments there, which do illustrate a point I was trying to make (and did a…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dave-ramsey-says-millionaires-drive-...
Nothing wrong with Toyota's, I've got a Corolla which does the job. I have a chuckle to myself when stopped at a set of lights next to some bloke in a car you know he's forking…"
4 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"In fairness, I've been guilty of poor conduct in the past. I'm now making a point of not doing that anymore."
8 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"HOE, it's possible for attacks on ideas to be attacks on people. It can be a fine line. But we can test the line. The test is to ask if the premise of an attack relates to some aspect of the identity of a person making a claim, or to the…"
8 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 244

 

RECRUITMENT

Seems like every week there are good quality players coming onto the market or that are available that would add something to our team and roster but we aren't seeming to be as active in the player market as we were earlier this year. EG Keon.…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by ParramattaLurker 6 minutes ago
Views: 98

Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs

I've noticed some comments from Bulldogs coach Ciraldo that he's not very happy with the refereeing/bunker calls made yesterday in his team's loss to the West Tigers.Not too sure if his concerns are justified or not! As I've not actually watched the…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by SuperEel 22 1 hour ago
Views: 516

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>