Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

JC replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"The Head of Football (or General Manager of Football) at an NRL club acts as the bridge between the executive board and the football department. They are responsible for the strategic direction, operational management, and overall success of the…"
19 minutes ago
JC replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"I'm genuinely surprised that the head coach hires the training staff, at the very least the head of football should give the coach a short-list of candidates to choose from after a thorough review of candidates by the head of football. "
23 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R13: The D.B. Cup
"I think sharpe carves us up. Knights will want to get revenge on that flogging they got last year. Our defence is not going to improve and our attack is at a snails pace compared to other teams knights 54 eels 10....but i hope i'm bloody wrong lets…"
27 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R13: The D.B. Cup
"Mallee, it was a rule brought in 2022 so what you think is irrelevant.
I gave us a rough chance but Ponga's availability i.e not rested it makes it hard. If Ponga had not been sent or just got 10 in the bin, he essentially missed the toughest part…"
33 minutes ago
JC replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Assistant coaches, yes he should have a say but training staff should be hired by the head of football.
Tell me,  what responsibility does the head of football have?, according to some on here he isn't responsible for recruitment or retention,  not…"
37 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion NSW Cup blog - Watch live 12:35
"Thanks EA. I guess we go with whoever is the best fit at the time."
41 minutes ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion NSW Cup blog - Watch live 12:35
"Nah I don't rate him. Fletcher is injured which is also why cause would be our normal Flegg 7"
44 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"LB everything under the football department in the end is O'neill's responsibility.  Ryles has to go through O'neill' before anything gets done.  
The state of the club now with O'neill at the helm as long as he has been,  means he should be axed…"
47 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R13: The D.B. Cup
"Really can't see the Eels winning this match BUT not impossible. Greater match upsets have been done over the years. I just hope they're at least competitive and it doesn't end up a thrashing. I really don't think Ponga should be allowed to play and…"
52 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion NSW Cup blog - Watch live 12:35
"Ryley Smith back playing. I thought his injury duration was longer"
56 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Do you feel like you're moving towards your objective?"
59 minutes ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"What are you talking about. Ryles wants to enforce a style of play, he will hire a trainer that suits what he wants to do. How is that not his responsibility? So he shouldn't hire assistants either? He has to work with trainers daily, of course it…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Simple really until the club and  team change the narrative the questions will continue to be rehashed and asked.
All I'm hoping for is DB doesn't have a career performance against his old club a club he should still be at but alas he isn't.
 "
1 hour ago
JC replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"That should not be the responsibility of the head coach,  if he wants that responsibility it should be denied.  The head coach already has enough on his plate."
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion NSW Cup blog - Watch live 12:35
"Is our Flegg #7 no good, or not ready to step up to reserve grade?
Why not play him instead of Twidle.?"
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R13: The D.B. Cup
"A safe bet is we will let in at least 20 points.
The Knights defence isn't spectacular so if we get an even share and complete well we may actually outscore them. 
Scoreline 28 -22 either way."
1 hour ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 224

 

Should we be concerned !

As we head into June and not far off the middle of the season, attentions really begin to look at 2027 rosters across the NRL.So far the club has signed a very good talent in Jayd'n Sua. He has played 6 origin games for Queensland (last in 2024) and…

Read more…
37 Replies · Reply by JC 20 minutes ago
Views: 628

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>