Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Much like Moses here I'd suggest he needs much the same hopefully this off season we can get him more help."
6 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
" Holbrook is a good coach. As long as the Knights don't get too many injuries and KP is on-field, Dylan will have enough around him to just do what's he currently doing. If not, we'll see."
9 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"D Brown has been paid on potential for several years, and is now at N'castle on a v high salary and needs to step up; he had one good season (22) for us. Wish him well"
9 minutes ago
Sonic Boom replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"I think people are short changing Volkman a bit. Attacking wise id have Volk ahead of Renzo right now.
Renzo is better at tempo and shortsides but Volk creates stuff out of nothing and is able to break the line when running.
I dont see the need to…"
13 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"All I'm seeing with DB now is Holbrook is slowly pulling him in while still giving him free reign at second reciever when he needs him there.Someone has to take the hit here and be the setup guys for KP and Sharpe.This will be beneficial for DBs…"
19 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"EA, I think the move to the Knights is good for Dylan (for more than $16m reasons) and he's definitely playing well. No argument there.
As I said to NOS, the way he reacted to his drop ball that opened to door for Souths back into the game and…"
20 minutes ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Looking at DB stats like that is a very poor way of looking at the affect he had on the game. DB didn't play as wide. Dylans best work when doing a team movement has always been how direct and square he plays at first or second receiver to give his…"
27 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"NOS, agree. It's cherry picking: last round. But it's also factual. Reality.
More cherry picking. Against Souths, it was a dropped ball from Brown on the line that allowed Souths to get back into the match and almost win it.
Admitedly, Souths made…"
29 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Newcastle spoon to top 8 in half a season.Parra bottom 4 just saying 😂 "
33 minutes ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"NOS and HOE, I believe he is the long term solution at 6 but I would not be rushing him into the NRL spot just because he is the future. Our team is decimated by injuries so let the team find some consistency in its team selection with the players…"
34 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Haha HOE, some top level 'cherry picking' there.
Great bait, but not biting.
 "
38 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Last round.
Volkman (came on a train and trial). 2 try assists. 6 tackles busts. 2 line-breaks. 5 runs for 95m. His break allowed Moses to kick the winning FG.
Brown ($13m + $3m in TPAs). 0 try assists. 1 tackle bust. 0 line breaks. 9 runs for 106m.…"
41 minutes ago
Trent replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Brodie Croft is getting looked at "
44 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Too many halves careers are being destroyed by putting them in too early.  Kade Reed at saints was highly regarded but playing in a bad team means his confidence is dropping each game and he will probably be replaced and disappear.  Putting Lorenzo…"
47 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Yeah giving Lorenzo a debut late in the year doesn't hurt, it can help a lot but throwing him in and saying "off you go" is not good with the team the way it is now."
50 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"I think Ronald Volkman is improving with every match at six and gaining lots of confidence."
59 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2411

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>