Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Chief do you have paper articles stuck to your bedroom wall, with string attached linking all stories together like in those detective movies to catch the reason of your theory on Super? Haha."
13 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"So let me get this straight. The committee, which consists of Ryles, MON, Sarantinos and Rogers, some if not all have other employment than other the club?
If they don't have someone in charge of recruitment then what is Rogers "head of recruitment"…"
15 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Super, I can see that you are in total defence of those responsible for the positionthe club is in  roster wise. Why i can't work out.  But eventually ill find out
Why don't you tell everyone why the recruitment team are doing a good job instead of…"
17 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Chiefy, in your world everyone seems to be in charge of recruitment."
20 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"See Pops without what you mention it's going to a gunfight without a enough ammo.The club must know this if we don't have that in place your going to lose most times.That's definitely an issue they need to fix.
People are moaning about tax free…"
25 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"The board are responsible for those below them and Sarantinos answers to.them.   O'neill and the recruitment team have kpi's to be met meaning the board can recommend the sacking of those below them if the recruitment criteria isn't met.  The board…"
25 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Yes correction. More so meant he played there before debuting. For Western Suburbs.
Edit- scrap that, MON was sacked in 2016, Gamble signed in 2017. So no correlation."
25 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"You got to have a plan and replacements lined up before firing anybody.
What I suspect will happen the mentioned board members will sit there 9 yr terms much like McElduff the last chairman did then they'll move on.
Stability has caused these…"
35 minutes ago
Baracuda replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"that we can attract talent and it sounds like barring some unknown factors, he would have been playing at parra."
35 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Let me clarify, no one said anything about a lack of respect. What I've heard from a player agent is the wheels turn very slowly at Parra. They are slow to make a decision, slow to put in an offer. Slow to return phone calls etc etc"
39 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"gamble is actually a dolphins junior"
43 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
""In the long term we will be winners"
How long have we been saying that poppa? How many years have we been saying we need outside backs
Its people like you, the apologists, who keep people like o'neill an Sarantinos in the job."
57 minutes ago
Gucci replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"This is the part I dont get on not only this page but the overall consensus from all social media. The club does not leak any signing until its a done deal. We can see that from Walker, Sua and Edwards. Now, the fans want to see we are out there in…"
1 hour ago
Jack replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Feels like we have been saying this for 4-5 years that we're short in outsides back "
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Agree there were some poor moments like you said especially early 2nd half was terrible. Yet overall considering the mixed team, some returning from injury, some out of position etc.. I thought they did well despite the errors and they could and…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Sorry no chance we played well that 15 minutes in the second half was diabolical.
I can't say we played well after that basically handed the game to he Knights.
Whats worse is the Knights did there best to keep us in the game firing the ball around…"
2 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 245

 

RECRUITMENT

Seems like every week there are good quality players coming onto the market or that are available that would add something to our team and roster but we aren't seeming to be as active in the player market as we were earlier this year. EG Keon.…

Read more…
45 Replies · Reply by LB 13 minutes ago
Views: 974

Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs

I've noticed some comments from Bulldogs coach Ciraldo that he's not very happy with the refereeing/bunker calls made yesterday in his team's loss to the West Tigers.Not too sure if his concerns are justified or not! As I've not actually watched the…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by BlacJac 3 hours ago
Views: 636

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>