Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Ill go with 
Burton 
Milky Jenkins "
20 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"What would you pay for fish ? There was a big bopper for saints similar to underhill. Look good of that 1 game. We need a fui."
55 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"No way just a plodder. Saints needs this type of forwards. Tonga moves like a giraffe with broken legs."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"So if we can't attract top tier talent what else is there but to over pay or wait until,an opportunity presents itself which is shrinking by the day with another 2 teams in the mix.
Do we have choice yes we do we can stick to our guns and quickly…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"He is better than what we currently have."
1 hour ago
TolEllts replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"It Is always frustrating to see former Eels players gets connected to other teams instead of the club. It appears that It also seems that Eels do not have former players in blue/ orange trainer/support on the field unlike other teams. What might it…"
1 hour ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Apparently it is Dean Young. Not sure how he will go"
1 hour ago
Adam Magrath replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"So we've got a situation here with two of our most learned contributors (both possibly moderators) challenging each other as to what they would do over potential signings. Both saying they wouldn't pay KK the sum offered by St George. Are people…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"No there will be Aliens going through the same in their universe saying how dumb the Eels are. Marvin the Martian saying "they make me very angry""
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"All good.  Anyway what's wrong with coming from another solar system.  Hopefully in a parallel universe the eels may be the leagues powerhouse premiership winning giants  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?

Mate I think you’ve completely misunderstood where I was coming from. I was actually defending you from FMP saying you wanted Gutho to stay.
I specifically pointed out you were in favour of moving Gutho on early. The BA comment was me explaining…"
2 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Fair call, EA. Be interesting to see which coach they land with. "
2 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Personally, l wouldn't pay Kalooamatangi anywhere near 1.2m, only front rower in that area, imo, is Payne Haas. But also don't believe Anasta at all that the Dragons are paying 1.2m.
1m per season is tougher, because imo we are desperately needing…"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Moses did i want him out - no.  Paulo  - no. Simmonson  no, Penasini no, Hopgood no, Brown  no. 
Are you sure you're not from another solar system LB.  You make things up every single day "
2 hours ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - End of Season SG/HM Player Review
"Sorovi is playing Sydney shield for Wenty. So that is the level below RM. He has scored 5 tries in 2 games. Hope he moves up to JF soon with Rokusuka as they both have more potential than Nelson and Tuala who are the current wingers "
4 hours ago
LB replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Pretty much was just saying they way you disliked BA there is no chance you would support their deciple staying."
4 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>