Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Eli Stephens replied to Bert de Naturál✌️™'s discussion Peter V’landys MIA: How the Lomax Affair Exposed Cracks at HQ
"The roosters fielding a team millions over the cap every season for the last 20 years was enough cracks for me 🤣 nrl is poorly run "
8 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Yeah an added bonus.  Bring him home Sarantinos.  Better than a 300k cheque "
11 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Son of the great man former parra player Alex Chan"
13 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"I just heard that Melbourne are now offering Joey Chan.
 He is also a distant relative to Jackie Chan -  He could bring the fear factor to our pack
 
 "
23 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"HOE, I don't think special services and reasonability can be neatly disentangled? Establishing the former as a protectable interest will prima facie legitimate the latter? If so, wouldn't the Eels be more likely at that point to have most of their…"
34 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Bert de Naturál✌️™'s discussion Peter V’landys MIA: How the Lomax Affair Exposed Cracks at HQ
"This is interesting, and to be honest the NRL has been a mess for years waiting for just this sort of thing to happen. When it appears that corruption is ripe yet the administration turns a blind eye, there are serious concerns. I'm so glad Parra…"
54 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"wow...I need glasses"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Nah, Bob runs his own business from Truckstop rest-rooms...but he does put in long hours"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Bert de Naturál✌️™'s discussion Peter V’landys MIA: How the Lomax Affair Exposed Cracks at HQ
"Just an update. The Eels and Lomax were in court again this afternoon and it now appears the matter may not proceed on the 12th. There is another listing on Monday to work it out, with the ball basically in Lomax s court. Chances are the matter will…"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Bert de Naturál✌️™'s discussion Peter V’landys MIA: How the Lomax Affair Exposed Cracks at HQ
"Great summary, right there. So what happens next. What do the NRL do, what does Lomax do, What do Melbourne do. What will be the Eels next move, will they sit and wait for clubs to come calling bearing player gifts, and does this go to court on the…"
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Correct"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Clintorian, do you mean to say if Lomax's team lied to the Eels about other offers, that impacts their claim the Eels were unreasonably restraining trade?
It's a question for the lawyers, but if Lomax was in fact in negotiations prior to being given…"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Don't lose sight of the fact he can go and play Rugby any day of the week, he doesn't have to pay a cent in transfer fees then, cancels his legal fees ...... if he had half a brain he would be playing Rugby this year, it would give him the…"
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"That's how I read the article also. Raiders never mentioned Parra lied, it's likely Lomax's management lied to the player or had some scheme that he was angling for. What other players does Shicockski have with Canberra"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"I think you mean Furner, but I will go with a typo!"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Stick to the empty head!"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2028

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 299

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>