Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Why are Melbourne scared why don't they pony up a player of equal talent instead of operating in the manner they are.I don't see us as scared I see us holding our ground we don't need to do anything Jim's made our position clear.
NRL can do what…"
7 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Lol
Why are you scared about other teams. Just make our team as competitive as possible by balancing our top 30 with players that make sense on good salaries who want to be here.
Id take Blore if he wants to play for Ryles 10000x before taking Lomax…"
41 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"💯 "
55 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Maybe thought Ryles being from there he would be fair and reasonable and instead has told them to bend over while he shoves their proposal up their arse."
59 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Money won't do it the Roosters can match that in after football options.I'd give us about a 10% chance.Understood the nrl are clowns for even wanting any part of this argument.They should be the ones with the popcorn enjoying the show as there's…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"A fair player swap would be ideal, but they don’t always eventuate. Exhibit A: When the Storm refused to release JAC. A swap was talked about for years. Never happened. JAC had to accept the contractual terms until its end."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"So I believe one of the reasonings from the NRL would be Newton's claim that no player should be used as a piece to get another player over to their club without them wanting them to. They will claim no Melbourne players wanted to go to Parra. 
Our…"
1 hour ago
Stevo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"HAHA I dont think they expected the kind of fight that has come to them, very intertested to see how this all pans out
 "
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Does anyone remember this?
"Using the media to pressure is one thing, but V'landys can’t force the club in any lawful way. He’d want it resolved, yet his public silence to date is telling. Out of character. Legal escalation would drag this out and be worse for him and Lomax."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Yeah pretty much. I wonder how the relationship between Ryles and Bellamy is now? Ryles seems to be holding his ground as well as everyone at the club. Good to see there is no looking after mates here.
"You won't give us Zac for nothing? Peter!…"
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Seriously mate you are the one off base here. Parra hold all the cards. Lomax is costing us nothing. Why allow a SOO and Australian winger go to Melbourne which make Melbourne a whole lot better, a team we have to play against and possibly compete…"
1 hour ago
Stevo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Take your own advice and scroll on if you dont like what you see
 "
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Do we know for sure? 1.2 million reasons to sign with Parra. lol I was being a bit facetious to be honest but I really don't see what the NRL can offer to situation other than try and strong arm us"
1 hour ago
Stevo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Parra and the Storm arent warring, its a case of Parra not giving the Storm want they want so the Storm went crying to V'Landys to fix it for them"
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Geez I'd love to see what you would all be saying if Parra was the one trying to sign Suaalii and the chooks had a clause. We currently have nothing. We could get something. It's not harder than that. Stefano would be amazing, Blore + an outside…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Does anyone remember this?
"Well forcing us? well they will lose fans from the game. if we say ..."
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1935

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 243

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>