Definitely worth the listen

not sure if people have seen this. Yes it's long but worth the listen to the end.

 

Covid

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • https://vimeo.com/553518199

  • It's worth a listen but so too is it worth it to listen to the refutations of McCullough's (McC) claims:

    - McC is wrong to claim the immunity acquired by natural contraction of Covid is safer than that acquired by vaccines. When you acquire Covid naturally you're also exposed to the full effect of the virus and all it's associated risks

    - McC is wrong to claim people contracting Covid naturally cannot reinfected. They can be. They have been.  
    - McC is wrong to claim 4,000 deaths due to vaccines. He is deliberately misreading the National database on vaccine side effects. It's deliberate because no competent doctor would fail to understand that the database reports deaths in total post events, and you must then drill down to specific causes of death. If you vaccinate 150+ million as the US has, you still get deaths in the population from all sources. So for instance if you get vaccinated and then ran over by a bus, that death gets tagged in the national database of  post-vaccination results. Thus, suggesting 4000 deaths due to vaccines is clearly deliberately misleading. 
    - McC suggests the spike protein produced by rhe vaccine is dangerous, but he misquotes the study he cites. The study was on hamsters, where the spike protein caused lung inflammation. But the study's authors noted the result cannot be extrapolated to humans because the spike protein in humans is much less. Moreover, the study McC cites further showed that the vaccine antibody inhibits damage to the cells lining the inner walls of blood vessels, straight contradicting McC's claim that the spike protein damages blood vessels. McC is thus either selectively misquoting the study or he does not understand it? I think the former. The metaphor of "spike" doing damage is intuitive enough that people who don't know medicine will be duped? That's my guess at present, on McC's while protein spike = damage idea 

    - orherwise, McC also trots out debunked conspiracy theories: no trial data for the vaccines but there were multiple Phase 3 trials independent of each other; that the vaccines "mark" you for surveillance or something (how dumb do you have to be to buy that?))

    So, yes, worth a listen. But also worth listening to the refutations. 

    PS: in case anyone wonders, one of my current grants (350k over 3yrs) is for disinformation research and we have tracked Covid disinformation. McC's claims are part of a notorious "Front Line Physicians" group in the US that has pivoted to misinformation about vaccines after starting with misinformation about Covid treatments. So I just happen to be familiar with McCullough's claims as we tracked them through various websites in the US especially. You don't have to believe anything I'm saying but I'm advising his views are full of false and misleading claims. 

    • I haven't watched it but I got my first dose of the Pfizer covid vaccine Tuesday just gone. Got to get the second dose in 3 weeks. I'm still alive and kicking. 

      • Thumbs up, Adam. I got my AstraZeneca, was tired for one day, and am still around to annoy the shit out of people. 

        • My shoulder had a bit of a bump and was a bit sore where they stuck the needle in. Only lasted one day and that was it. 

          I didn’t get vaccinated because I was concerned with catching the virus. I just didnt want to pass it on to someone else. Also both my parents and my wife’s parents are both aging and in the not too distant future be in either hospital or aged care. I reckon you’ll have to be vaccinated to enter either of those facilities. 

          • But you can still pass it on Adam. That's why you still get locked down even if you have been vaccinated.

            • As you said, people can make up their own minds what they want to do. I made up my mind and got vaccinated and stated the reasons for it. I’m no expert on the matter, so you can argue with me until you’re blue in the face. I can’t offer you any answers or tell you what you should do. It’s your body and your life, make whatever decision you think is best for you.

              • I think you misunderstood me Adam. I'm not arguing with you, you just stated why you got it and I made a comment re the passing it on. 

                tts been stated that the vaccines don't prevent you from getting it or passing it on. It would be wrong if I didn't tell you that and you thought you couldn't infect your parents.

                that's what I mean about having all the information.

                • I never said prevented, that is absolute. Nothing in life is certain.

                  Is the likelihood of being infected with the virus or transmitting it to someone else reduced when a person is vaccinated? Yes or no?

                  You are probably better off having this discussion with someone who hasn’t been vaccinated. My course is already set.

                • Rider, this is not "all the information". Prevention of transmission is important but has to be put in context of rates of reduced transmission and the percentage at an individual level of the reduction in severity of effect. It's a misrepresentation of what vaccines do at the population level to think a point about prevention at the individual level cuts the mustard. 

                  Did you know that stopping smoking does not prevent you from getting cancer? Should we not bother with reducing smoking? Did you know that a well funded police force does not prevent crime? Should we not bother with police? Oh I know a good one. Did you know that a strong border force does not prevent illegal immigration? Should we not bother with border patrols?

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Parra_Greg replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Next Five Weeks at Home
"Really shows how important Thursday win was .  Im sure Ryles would take 50% for that road trip"
4 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to Herbert Hamilton's discussion Fight off spoon again
"Dribbler!"
5 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Next Five Weeks at Home
"Wow, we can't complain about the early tough rounds if that's the run we get without leaving Sydney. Time to put some pts on that ladder!
Dragons > Panthers > Tigers > Titans > Bulldogs > Eagles > Warriors.
Four of those are easily winnable.…"
9 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"What's the point of now having an extended bench of 6 players instead on 4 when you can still only use 4 which is basically the same. It would be better if all 6 could be used."
24 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Why did fans want Ryles head after 1 game ?
"You're absolutely right. Everything is going great with our R&R. We are retaining our rep players and signing everyone we go after 
 
(written in sarcastica font)"
33 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger commented on Acme’s status
"G'day Acme, I've been reading here daily but the state of the world right now has my mind, emotions and commenting elsewhere. I'm trying to convince myself that with Ukraine and Iran the opening salvos of ww3 haven't been fired. I'm stressed right…"
36 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Why did fans want Ryles head after 1 game ?
"The only issue I have with MON is that we are preparing a good half back for a team full of champions in the Broncos.....in 2027."
56 minutes ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"That's why you start Kelma off the bench. When we make the first interchange, you bring Kelma on and shift Williams into the middle"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Why did fans want Ryles head after 1 game ?
"True as. A good sign to me was Hopgood Pensini both out and 2 players slotted in no drama. Tells me his system is starting to sink in and we will look more Melbourne like as time goes on. Just needs time to coach it all into them "
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"Alamadine is in JF. Roksuka is in SG ball. So Richie and Nanva are at the top of the pecking order for youngsters. JF and Cup have a bye this week so I will wait a few rounds before making judgement on those players. In SG ball I want to see how…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Why did fans want Ryles head after 1 game ?
"I get the expectations were very high but we dropped the ball every 2 seconds and storm had all the running. Was always going to be a flogging if the players couldn't complete a set. Ryles has a good 2-3 years of good grace in my books to make the…"
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"Moretti also had a very good combo with Walker"
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"I won't be happy if Tuivita misses out. He needs to play every game for sure. "
1 hour ago
Acme replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Why did fans want Ryles head after 1 game ?
"People were expecting our form from late last year to carry into the new season. When that didn't happen, people got frustrated and responded in an emotional way. It's called passion, and people deal with it in diffeent ways.
You're only as good as…"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"Yes I agree with this team, I think its the strongest line up.  To be fair I even think Moretti should be in front of Debelin. 
However,  I think Ryles knows that Debelin will play strongly against the club that didn't want him, and give him the…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Why did fans want Ryles head after 1 game ?
"Yep"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2193

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>