You wouldn’t last a week’: Eels star fires back at critics of coach

EELS
 
926bda2c3f265be85d8cd8e1fd53839c

Despite finishing third and assembling one of the best rosters the Eels have known over the last few years, coach Brad Arthur has come in for some scathing criticism since their finals exit.

The knock on Arthur is that since he joined the Eels, they’ve only won one finals game and that was against Brisbane 58-0.

The wagons have circled Arthur since Parramatta were sent packing by South Sydney.

Catch Fox League’s Grand Final Week coverage on Kayo. Stream all the latest news and insight right up until kick off plus half-time and full-time analysis from the Fox League commentary team. New to Kayo? Get your 14-day free trial & start streaming instantly >

Ever since that defeat talk has raged that the coach, and his key playmaker Mitchell Moses, aren’t up to the task of ending Parramatta’s lengthy premiership drought.

In the eyes of prop Reagan Campbell-Gillard, however, talk of Arthur being out of his depth are way out of line.

“Brad is definitely the bloke for the (Eels) job, he has turned my football around,” Campbell-Gillard told AAP after being recalled to the NSW Blues squad.

 

“The respect he has for the players, and the players for him is massive.”

Since their capitulation against the Rabbitohs there have been a number of theories thrown up as to what to do next.

There is a suggestion that the Eels coach and general manager of football Mark O’Neill don’t get on.

While a story was flouted that Parramatta may look to bring in Tim Sheens or Shane Flanagan to help assist Arthur after both left Widnes and St George Illawarra recently.

Campbell-Gillard, however, says critics wouldn’t stand a chance if they were handed the reins of coaching an NRL club and should lay off the coach.

 

“I think all those opinions have probably got to be kept to themselves. Brad is an excellent coach, I will back him 100 per cent,” the prop added.

“All those reports, I found pretty off. That’s not what he is about and it’s not what should be around about him.

“It doesn’t reflect everything he does for everyone at the club.

“This competition is a very tough competition, if not the toughest in the world.

“It’s very hard to make semi-finals.

“If you think you could do a better job, come try and do it. You wouldn’t last a week.”

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • LMFAO - selective copy and paste from 1EE blogs - classic.

    Good to hear the players are backing their coach - now for some intelligent systems put in pace and we could be a chance sometime in the future.

  • Please find a replacement for B.A. within a week.
    I am sorry that Campbell Gillard has not looked at the team results after given B,A. full support.
    We need smart players who can play regards despite a coach's plan is faulty.
    Gillard has disapointed many supporters who had hoped a better coach to assist their side in the future.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
2 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
2 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
4 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
4 hours ago
More…